Christopher Burton1, David Weller, Michael Sharpe. 1. Division of Community Health Sciences, General Practice Section, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. chris.burton@ed.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate electronic diaries as a tool for investigating associations between physical symptoms and psychological variables. METHODS: A qualitative systematic review of electronic diary studies in pain and symptoms research was performed. RESULTS: Studies of electronic diary use report good acceptability and accuracy of data recording. A descriptive classification of the findings of electronic diary studies yielded five categories: experience, recording data when symptoms were present; interaction, testing the relationship between variables at different levels; sequential, observing associations at different time lags; process, recording possible mediating constructs such as catastrophization and self-efficacy; and intervention, recording during treatment to identify trends. Most data from diary studies suggest relatively weak associations between variables. CONCLUSION: Electronic diaries are a potentially valuable tool for psychosomatic research. We suggest further possibilities for their use.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate electronic diaries as a tool for investigating associations between physical symptoms and psychological variables. METHODS: A qualitative systematic review of electronic diary studies in pain and symptoms research was performed. RESULTS: Studies of electronic diary use report good acceptability and accuracy of data recording. A descriptive classification of the findings of electronic diary studies yielded five categories: experience, recording data when symptoms were present; interaction, testing the relationship between variables at different levels; sequential, observing associations at different time lags; process, recording possible mediating constructs such as catastrophization and self-efficacy; and intervention, recording during treatment to identify trends. Most data from diary studies suggest relatively weak associations between variables. CONCLUSION: Electronic diaries are a potentially valuable tool for psychosomatic research. We suggest further possibilities for their use.
Authors: Michael E Newcomb; Gregory Swann; Ryne Estabrook; Marya Corden; Mark Begale; Alan Ashbeck; David Mohr; Brian Mustanski Journal: Assessment Date: 2016-09-01
Authors: Jason C G Halford; Emma J Boyland; John E Blundell; Tim C Kirkham; Joanne A Harrold Journal: Nat Rev Endocrinol Date: 2010-03-16 Impact factor: 43.330
Authors: Beate Wild; Michael Eichler; Hans-Christoph Friederich; Mechthild Hartmann; Stephan Zipfel; Wolfgang Herzog Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2010-04-01 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: James M McCaw; Kristian Forbes; Paula M Nathan; Philippa E Pattison; Garry L Robins; Terence M Nolan; Jodie McVernon Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2010-06-10 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Jori Reijula; Toni Rosendahl; Kari Reijula; Paula Roilas; Heikki Roilas; Raimo Sepponen Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2009-12-03 Impact factor: 3.921