Literature DB >> 17466784

The impact of increasing age on anatomic factors affecting carotid angioplasty and stenting.

Russell C Lam1, Stephanie C Lin, Brian DeRubertis, Robert Hynecek, K Craig Kent, Peter L Faries.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Current evaluations of carotid artery angioplasty and stenting (CAS) have suggested equivalency compared with carotid endarterectomy (CEA). However, the incidence of stroke and death with CAS may be higher in elderly patients. We assessed the anatomic characteristics of patients undergoing CAS and compared them based on age older or younger than 80 years. The impact of age on the incidence of postoperative complications was also determined.
METHODS: From February 2003 to August 2005, 135 CAS procedures were performed in 133 patients. Digital subtraction angiograms for each patient were evaluated by two independent observers blinded to patient identifiers. Anatomic characteristics that impact the performance of CAS were assessed as either favorable or unfavorable. These included aortic arch elongation, arch calcification, arch vessel origin stenosis, common and internal carotid artery tortuosity, and treated lesion stenosis, calcification, and length. Postoperative events were defined as myocardial infarction, stroke, and death. Fisher's exact test and chi(2) tests were used to determine statistical significance (P < .05).
RESULTS: Of the 133 patients treated, 87 (65%) were men and 46 (35%) were women; and 37 (28%) were >or=80 years of age. The cohort >or=80 years old had an increased incidence of unfavorable arch elongation (P = .008), arch calcification (P = .003), common carotid or innominate artery origin stenosis (P = .006), common carotid artery tortuosity (P = .0009), internal carotid artery tortuosity (P = .019), and treated lesion stenosis (P = .007). No significant difference was found for treated lesion calcification or length. Perioperative cerebral vascular accidents occurred in four patients (3.0%, 3 with no residual deficit, 1 with residual deficit), myocardial infarction in three (2.2%), and one patient (0.8%) died secondary to a hemorrhagic stroke. The combined stroke, myocardial infarction, and death rate for the entire population was 3.7%. The rate was significantly increased in patients aged >or=80 years old (10.8%) compared with those aged <80 years old (1%, P = .012).
CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients, defined as those aged >80 years, have a higher incidence of anatomy that increases the technical difficulty of performing CAS. This increase in unfavorable anatomy may be associated with complications during CAS. Although the small number of perioperative events does not allow for determination of a direct relationship with specific anatomic characteristics, the presence of unfavorable anatomy does warrant serious consideration during evaluation for CAS in elderly patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17466784     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.12.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  44 in total

Review 1.  Twisted blood vessels: symptoms, etiology and biomechanical mechanisms.

Authors:  Hai-Chao Han
Journal:  J Vasc Res       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 1.934

2.  Dampening of blood-flow pulsatility along the carotid siphon: does form follow function?

Authors:  T Schubert; F Santini; A F Stalder; J Bock; S Meckel; L Bonati; M Markl; S Wetzel
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Anatomical risk factors for ischemic lesions associated with carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Go Ikeda; Wataro Tsuruta; Yasunobu Nakai; Masanari Shiigai; Aiki Marushima; Tomohiko Masumoto; Hideo Tsurushima; Akira Matsumura
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 1.610

4.  Age and outcomes after carotid stenting and endarterectomy: the carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial.

Authors:  Jenifer H Voeks; George Howard; Gary S Roubin; Mahmoud B Malas; David J Cohen; W Charles Sternbergh; Herbert D Aronow; Mark K Eskandari; Alice J Sheffet; Brajesh K Lal; James F Meschia; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Transcervical access via direct neck exposure for neurointerventional procedures in the hybrid angiosuite.

Authors:  Jong Young Lee; Jong-Hwa Park; Hong Jun Jeon; Dae Young Yoon; Seoung Woo Park; Byung Moon Cho
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Metabolic syndrome is associated with increased risk of short-term post-procedural complications after carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Shuyang Dong; Zeyan Peng; Yong Tao; Yinchao Huo; Huadong Zhou
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.307

7.  Immediate and Delayed Procedural Stroke or Death in Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis.

Authors:  Mandy D Müller; Stefanie von Felten; Ale Algra; Jean-Pierre Becquemin; Martin Brown; Richard Bulbulia; David Calvet; Hans-Henning Eckstein; Gustav Fraedrich; Alison Halliday; Jeroen Hendrikse; John Gregson; George Howard; Olav Jansen; Jean-Louis Mas; Thomas G Brott; Peter A Ringleb; Leo H Bonati
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Current concepts in the management of carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Norman R Hertzer
Journal:  F1000 Med Rep       Date:  2009-02-24

Review 9.  Secondary stroke prevention strategies for the oldest patients: possibilities and challenges.

Authors:  Cheryl D Bushnell; Cathleen S Colón-Emeric
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 10.  Carotid artery disease: stenting versus endarterectomy.

Authors:  Andreas Kastrup; Sonja Schnaudigel; Katrin Wasser; Klaus Gröschel
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.