OBJECTIVE: To assess reliability of isokinetic peak torque and work for knee flexion and extension. DESIGN: Single-group test-retest. SETTING: University laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven men and 7 women (mean age, 21 y). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Peak torque and work for concentric and eccentric knee extension and flexion were recorded at 60 degrees/s for 3 trials on 2 occasions. Intraclass correlation coefficient model 3,1 (ICC(3,1)), standard error (SE) of measurements, and smallest real differences were calculated for the maximum and for the mean peak torque and work of the 3 repetitions. RESULTS: Relative reliability was "very high" for peak torque and work (ICC range, >.90). The SE measurements ranged between 5% and 10% of the initial values for both peak torque and work. The smallest change that indicates a real improvement for a single subject (smallest real differences) ranged from 12% to 25% for peak torque and work variables and from 25% to 30% for the peak torque ratios. CONCLUSIONS: Isokinetic concentric and eccentric knee extensor and flexor strength variables are reliable when measured by the same examiner in asymptomatic subjects.
OBJECTIVE: To assess reliability of isokinetic peak torque and work for knee flexion and extension. DESIGN: Single-group test-retest. SETTING: University laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven men and 7 women (mean age, 21 y). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Peak torque and work for concentric and eccentric knee extension and flexion were recorded at 60 degrees/s for 3 trials on 2 occasions. Intraclass correlation coefficient model 3,1 (ICC(3,1)), standard error (SE) of measurements, and smallest real differences were calculated for the maximum and for the mean peak torque and work of the 3 repetitions. RESULTS: Relative reliability was "very high" for peak torque and work (ICC range, >.90). The SE measurements ranged between 5% and 10% of the initial values for both peak torque and work. The smallest change that indicates a real improvement for a single subject (smallest real differences) ranged from 12% to 25% for peak torque and work variables and from 25% to 30% for the peak torque ratios. CONCLUSIONS: Isokinetic concentric and eccentric knee extensor and flexor strength variables are reliable when measured by the same examiner in asymptomatic subjects.
Authors: Grant D Sanders; Arthur J Nitz; Mark G Abel; T Brock Symons; Robert Shapiro; W Scott Black; James W Yates Journal: J Chiropr Med Date: 2015-11-06
Authors: Said El-Ashker; Brian P Carson; Francisco Ayala; Mark De Ste Croix Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2015-07-07 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Edward P Weiss; Richard C Jordan; Ethel M Frese; Stewart G Albert; Dennis T Villareal Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: David S Logerstedt; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Richard C Ritter; Michael J Axe; Joseph J Godges Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Ruud H Knols; Geert Aufdemkampe; Eling D de Bruin; Daniel Uebelhart; Neil K Aaronson Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2009-03-09 Impact factor: 2.362