Literature DB >> 17466586

Neurophysiology of the neurogenic lower urinary tract disorders.

Simon Podnar1.   

Abstract

The nervous system structures involved in the control of the lower urinary tract (LUT) are usually divided using a neuroanatomical classification system into suprapontine, pontine, spinal and sacral. In all patients with LUT symptoms, after exclusion of local causes, a nervous system disorder needs to be considered. For the diagnosis of neurogenic LUT disorders, in addition to clinical assessment, neurophysiologic testing might be useful. Imaging and other laboratory studies (e.g., cystometry) often provide relevant additional information. Neurophysiologic tests are more useful in patients with sacral compared with suprasacral disorders. Although in patients with LUT disorders external urethral sphincter (EUS) electromyography (EMG) would seem the most appropriate, anal sphincter EMG is the single most useful diagnostic test, particularly for focal sacral lesions, and atypical parkinsonism. Another clinically useful method that tests the sacral segments, and complements EMG, is the sacral (penilo/clitoro-cavernosus) reflex. Kinesiologic EMG is useful to demonstrate detrusor sphincter dyssynergia (i.e., increased EUS activity during bladder contraction), which is particularly common in spinal cord disease. Somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) and motor evoked potential (MEP) studies (cortical and lumbar) may be useful to diagnose clinically silent central lesions. MEP, in addition, seems to be very promising in research into cortical excitability. Theoretically, cortical SEP on bladder/urethra stimulation would be much more useful than pudendal SEP because it tests thin nerve afferents from the pelvic viscera. However, the utility of this technique is limited by technical difficulties, which can be partially overcome by the concomitant recording of a palmar sympathetic skin response (SSR). SSR recorded from the saddle region is also useful for testing the lumbosacral sympathetic system. Although the technique of detrusor EMG has been recently described in humans, a clinically useful test for evaluating the sacral parasympathetic system, which is crucial for LUT functioning, is still lacking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17466586     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.01.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  8 in total

1.  Cortical and spinal evoked potential response to electrical stimulation in human rectum.

Authors:  Brian Garvin; Lisa Lovely; Alex Tsodikov; Danielle Minecan; Shaungson Hong; John W Wiley
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Sex differences in pudendal somatosensory evoked potentials.

Authors:  G Pelliccioni; V Piloni; D Sabbatini; P Fioravanti; O Scarpino
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Neurophysiology of the pelvic floor in clinical practice: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Fiorella Bianchi; Giovanna M Squintani; M Osio; A Morini; C Bana; G Ardolino; S Barbieri; L Bertolasi; R Caramelli; F Cogiamanian; A Currà; G de Scisciolo; C Foresti; V Frasca; E Frasson; M Inghilleri; L Maderna; L Motti; E Onesti; M C Romano; U Del Carro
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2017 Oct/Dec

Review 4.  Sphincter EMG as a diagnostic tool in autonomic disorders.

Authors:  Ryuji Sakakibara; Tomoyuki Uchiyama; Tomonori Yamanishi; Masahiko Kishi
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2008-09-08       Impact factor: 4.435

Review 5.  Clinical autonomic neurophysiology and the male sexual response: an overview.

Authors:  Claire C Yang; Xiaogang Jiang
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Electrophysiological study of the bulbocavernosus reflex: normative data.

Authors:  Giuseppe Granata; Luca Padua; Fabiana Rossi; Paola De Franco; Daniele Coraci; Vincenzo Rossi
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec

7.  Quantitative evaluation of electrodes for external urethral sphincter electromyography during bladder-to-urethral guarding reflex.

Authors:  James E Steward; Jessica D Clemons; Paul J Zaszczurynski; Robert S Butler; Margot S Damaser; Hai-Hong Jiang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  External urethral sphincter pressure measurement: an accurate method for the diagnosis of detrusor external sphincter dyssynergia?

Authors:  Carlos H Suzuki Bellucci; Jens Wöllner; Flavia Gregorini; Dorothee Birnböck; Marko Kozomara; Ulrich Mehnert; Thomas M Kessler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.