Literature DB >> 24357448

Sex differences in pudendal somatosensory evoked potentials.

G Pelliccioni1, V Piloni, D Sabbatini, P Fioravanti, O Scarpino.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) of the pudendal nerve are a well-established diagnostic tool for the evaluation of pelvic floor disorders. However, the possible influence of sex differences on response latencies has not been established yet. The aim of this study was to standardize the procedures and to evaluate possible effects of gender differences on anal and penile/clitoral SEPs.
METHODS: The anal and dorsal penile/clitoral SEPs were recorded in 84 healthy subjects (40 males and 44 females; mean age 47.9 ± 16.6 years, range 16-81 years; mean height 168.3 ± 20.3 cm, range 155-187 cm). Pudendal SEPs were evoked with a bipolar surface electrode stimulating the clitoris or the base of the penis and the anal orifice and recorded using scalp electrodes. The latency of the first positive component (P1) was measured. The effect and possible interaction of (a) stimulation site and (b) gender on the two variables was explored by multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA).
RESULTS: The examination was well tolerated and a reproducible waveform of sufficient quality was obtained in all the subjects examined. In the female subjects, a mean cortical P1 latency of 37.0 ± 2.6 and 36.4 ± 3.2 ms for anal and clitoral stimulation, respectively, was found. In the male subjects, the cortical latencies were 38.0 ± 3.5 ms for the anal stimulation and 40.2 ± 3.7 ms for the penile stimulation. At MANOVA, a statistically significant main effect of stimulation site and gender as well as a significant interaction between the two variables was found.
CONCLUSIONS: Anal and dorsal penile/clitoral SEPs represent a well-tolerated and reproducible method to assess the functional integrity of the sensory pathways in male and female subjects. Obtaining sex-specific reference data, by individual electrophysiological testing, is highly recommended because of significant latency differences between males and females, at least as far as penile/clitoral responses are concerned.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24357448     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-013-1105-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  28 in total

1.  Electromyography of the anal sphincter: which muscle to examine?

Authors:  Simon Podnar
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.217

2.  Predictive power of motor unit potential parameters in anal sphincter electromyography.

Authors:  Simon Podnar; Mićo Mrkaić
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.217

3.  Urodynamic evaluation as neurologic test of sacral cord function.

Authors:  J G Blaivas; R M Scott; K B Labib
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  A new approach to electromyography of the external urethral sphincter.

Authors:  J G Blaivas; K L Labib; S B Bauer; A B Retik
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Protocol for clinical neurophysiologic examination of the pelvic floor.

Authors:  S Podnar; D B Vodusek
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.696

6.  Pudendal evoked responses.

Authors:  S Haldeman; W E Bradley; N N Bhatia; B K Johnson
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1982-05

7.  Nerve conduction velocity varies inversely with height.

Authors:  W W Campbell; L C Ward; T R Swift
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1981 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.217

8.  Evoked responses from the pudendal nerve.

Authors:  S Haldeman; W E Bradley; N Bhatia
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Penile and perianal pudendal nerve somatosensory evoked potentials in the diagnosis of erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  T Kaiser; W H Jost; J Osterhage; H Derouet; K Schimrigk
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.896

10.  Abnormalities of the innervation of the urethral striated sphincter musculature in incontinence.

Authors:  S J Snooks; M Swash
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1984-08
View more
  4 in total

1.  Scalp Topography of Lower Urinary Tract Sensory Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Stéphanie van der Lely; Thomas M Kessler; Ulrich Mehnert; Martina D Liechti
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  New method for early evaluation of clitoris innervation using clitoro-perineal reflex after feminizing genitoplasty in early childhood: a pilot-study.

Authors:  Valeska Bidault; Nathalie Botto; Annabel Paye-Jaouen; Juliane Leger; Éliane Josset-Raffet; Laetitia Martinerie; Matthieu Peycelon; Alaa El-Ghoneimi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  To Explore the Diagnostic Value of Bulbocavernosus Muscle Reflex and Pudendal Somatosensory Evoked Potentials for Diabetic Neurogenic Bladder.

Authors:  Ning Nan; Qi Chen; Tie Chong
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Low test-retest reliability of a protocol for assessing somatosensory cortex excitability generated from sensory nerves of the lower back.

Authors:  Katja Ehrenbrusthoff; Cormac G Ryan; Denis J Martin; Volker Milnik; Hubert R Dinse; Christian Grüneberg
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 3.473

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.