Literature DB >> 17466479

Magnetic resonance imaging of hindfoot involvement in patients with spondyloarthritides: comparison of low-field and high-field strength units.

Iris Eshed1, Christian E Althoff, Eugen Feist, Kirsten Minden, Tania Schink, Bernd Hamm, Kay-Geert A Hermann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare MRI evaluation of a painful hindfoot of patients with spondyloarthritides (SpA) on low-field (0.2 T) versus high-field (1.5 T) MRI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with SpA and hindfoot pain were randomly referred to either high-field or low-field MRI. Twenty-seven patients were evaluated (male/female: 17:10; mean age: 39+/-1.4 years). Fifteen patients were examined by low-field and 12 by high-field MRI. Two patients (evaluated by high-field MRI) were excluded. Images were separately read by two radiologists who later reached a consensus. In each patient the prevalence of erosions, fluid, synovitis or bone marrow edema of the hindfoot joints, tendinosis or tenosynovitis of tendons, enthesitis of the plantar fascia and Achilles tendon and retrocalcaneal bursitis were recorded. Clinical and demographic parameters were comparable between both groups.
RESULTS: MRI evaluation of joints and tendons of the hindfoot revealed no significant differences in patients with SpA groups for all parameters. Analyzing all joints or tendons together, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Low-field and high-field MRI provide comparable information for evaluation of inflammatory hindfoot involvement. Thus, low-field MRI can be considered as a reliable diagnostic tool for the detection of hindfoot abnormalities in SpA patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17466479     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  9 in total

1.  Tendon and ligament imaging.

Authors:  R J Hodgson; P J O'Connor; A J Grainger
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  [Imaging modalities in psoriatic arthritis].

Authors:  K-G A Hermann; S Ohrndorf; S G Werner; S Finzel; M Backhaus
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 3.  Bone marrow lesions: a universal bone response to injury?

Authors:  Erik Fink Eriksen; Johan Diederich Ringe
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 2.631

4.  Quantitative MRI measurements of the Achilles tendon in spondyloarthritis using ultrashort echo times.

Authors:  R J Hodgson; N Menon; A J Grainger; P J O'Connor; D McGonagle; P Helliwell; P Emery; M D Robson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics in patients with spondyloarthritis and clinical diagnosis of heel enthesitis: post hoc analysis from the phase 3 ACHILLES trial.

Authors:  X Baraliakos; P Sewerin; E de Miguel; E Pournara; C Kleinmond; A Shekhawat; C Jentzsch; A Wiedon; F Behrens
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  [Low-field magnetic resonance imaging for rheumatoid arthritis].

Authors:  B Ostendorf; E Edelmann; H Kellner; A Scherer
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 7.  MRI of enthesitis of the appendicular skeleton in spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Iris Eshed; Matthias Bollow; Dennis G McGonagle; Ai Lyn Tan; Christian E Althoff; Patrick Asbach; Kay-Geert A Hermann
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Imaging of the Achilles tendon in spondyloarthritis: a comparison of ultrasound and conventional, short and ultrashort echo time MRI with and without intravenous contrast.

Authors:  R J Hodgson; A J Grainger; P J O'Connor; R Evans; L Coates; H Marzo-Ortega; P Helliwell; D McGonagle; P Emery; M D Robson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  The Vienna morphological Achilles tendon score-VIMATS : Description, reproducibility and initial clinical results.

Authors:  Sebastian Apprich; Arastoo Nia; Markus M Schreiner; Klaus Friedrich; Reinhard Windhager; Siegfried Trattnig
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.275

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.