Literature DB >> 17466232

The relationship between neo-aortic root dilation, insufficiency, and reintervention following the Ross procedure in infants, children, and young adults.

Sara K Pasquali1, Meryl S Cohen, David Shera, Gil Wernovsky, Thomas L Spray, Bradley S Marino.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to describe the relationship between neo-aortic root size, neo-aortic insufficiency (AI), and reintervention at mid-term follow-up.
BACKGROUND: Data on neo-aortic valve function and growth after the Ross procedure in children are limited.
METHODS: A total of 74 of 119 Ross patients from January 1995 to December 2003 had > or =2 follow-up echocardiograms at our institution and were included. Neo-aortic dimensions were converted to z-scores and modeled over time. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess freedom from neo-aortic outcomes, and predictors were identified through multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Median age at Ross was 9 years (range 3 days to 34 years). Over 4.7 years (range 3 months to 9.3 years) follow-up, there was disproportionate enlargement of the neo-aortic root (z-score increase of 0.75/year [p < 0.0001]). Neo-AI progressed > or =1 grade in 36% of patients and > or =2 grades in 15%. Nine patients (12%) had neo-aortic reintervention at 2.0 years (range 1.1 to 9.5 years) after the Ross procedure owing to severe neo-AI (n = 7), neo-aortic root dilation (n = 1), and neo-aortic pseudoaneurysm (n = 1). At 6 years after the Ross procedure, freedom from neo-aortic reintervention was 88%. Freedom from neo-aortic root z-score >4 was only 3% and from moderate or greater neo-AI was 60%. Longer follow-up time was associated with neo-aortic root dilation (p < 0.0001). Prior ventricular septal defect (VSD) repair predicted neo-AI (p = 0.02) and reintervention (p = 0.03). Prior aortic valve replacement (p = 0.002) also predicted neo-AI. Neo-aortic root dilation was not associated with neo-AI or reintervention.
CONCLUSIONS: At mid-term follow-up after the Ross procedure, neo-aortic root size increases significantly out of proportion to somatic growth, and neo-AI is progressive. Prior VSD repair and aortic valve replacement were associated with neo-AI and reintervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17466232     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  13 in total

1.  Aortic valve repair in children.

Authors:  Yves d'Udekem
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-01

2.  Maladaptive aortic properties after the Norwood procedure: An angiographic analysis of the Pediatric Heart Network Single Ventricle Reconstruction Trial.

Authors:  Sarah T Plummer; Christoph P Hornik; Hamilton Baker; Gregory A Fleming; Susan Foerster; M Eric Ferguson; Andrew C Glatz; Russel Hirsch; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Kyong-Jin Lee; Alan B Lewis; Jennifer S Li; Mary Martin; Diego Porras; Wolfgang A K Radtke; John F Rhodes; Julie A Vincent; Jeffrey D Zampi; Kevin D Hill
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Single-centre experience of 101 paediatric and adult Ross procedures: mid-term results.

Authors:  Angela McBrien; Milind Chaudhari; David S Crossland; Helen Aspey; Alison Heads-Baister; Massimo Griselli; John O'Sullivan; Asif Hasan
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-02-22

4.  Size and Stiffness of the Pulmonary Autograft after the Ross Procedure in Children.

Authors:  Yusuke Ando; Yoshie Ochiai; Shigehiko Tokunaga; Manabu Hisahara; Hironori Baba; Chihiro Miyagi; Tomoya Takigawa
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 5.  Aortic valve neo-cuspidation using the Ozaki technique for acquired and congenital disease: where does this procedure currently stand?

Authors:  Christopher W Baird; Supreet P Marathe; Pedro J Del Nido
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-01-09

6.  The Ross procedure in children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Morgan K Moroi; Emile A Bacha; David M Kalfa
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-07

Review 7.  Aortic valve replacement in children: Options and outcomes.

Authors:  Bahaaldin Alsoufi
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2013-11-13

Review 8.  Surgical treatment of aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Tirone E David
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 32.419

9.  The Impact of Aortic Valve Replacement on Left Ventricular Remodeling in Children.

Authors:  Anoop K Singh; Ross M Ungerleider; Yuk M Law
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 1.655

10.  Quantification of congenital aortic valve stenosis in pediatric patients: comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography.

Authors:  Selma Sirin; Kai Nassenstein; Ulrich Neudorf; Christoph J Jensen; Christian Mikat; Thomas Schlosser
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 1.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.