Literature DB >> 17465641

Animal-to-human extrapolation of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of buprenorphine.

Ashraf Yassen1, Erik Olofsen, Jingmin Kan, Albert Dahan, Meindert Danhof.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This investigation describes the interspecies scaling of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of buprenorphine.
METHODS: Data on the time course of the antinociceptive and respiratory depressant effects of buprenorphine in rats and in humans were simultaneously analysed on the basis of a mechanism-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model.
RESULTS: An allometric three-compartment pharmacokinetic model described the time course of the concentration in plasma. The value of the allometric coefficient for clearance was 35.2 mL/min (relative standard error [RSE] = 5.6%) and the value of the allometric exponent was 0.76 (RSE 5.61%). A combined biophase distribution-receptor association/dissociation model with a linear transduction function described hysteresis between plasma concentration and effect. The values of the drug-specific pharmacodynamic parameters were identical in rats and in humans. For the respiratory depressant effect, the values of the second-order rate constant of receptor association (k(on)) and the first-order rate constant of receptor dissociation (k(off)) were 0.23 mL/ng/min (RSE = 15.8%) and 0.014 min(-1) (RSE = 27.7%), respectively, and the value of the equilibrium dissociation constant (K(diss)) was 0.13 nmol/L. The value of the intrinsic activity alpha was 0.52 (RSE = 3.4%). For the antinociceptive effect, the values of the k(on) and k(off) were 0.015 mL/ng/min (RSE = 18.3%) and 0.053 min(-1) (RSE = 23.1%), respectively. The value of the K(diss) was 7.5 nmol/L. An allometric equation described the scaling of the system-specific parameter, the first-order distribution rate constant (k(e0)). The value of the allometric coefficient for the k(e0) was 0.0303 min(-1) (RSE = 11.3%) and the value of the exponent was -0.28 (RSE = 9.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: The different values of the drug-specific pharmacodynamic parameters are consistent with the different opioid mu receptor subtypes involved in the antinociceptive and respiratory depressant effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17465641     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200746050-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  25 in total

1.  Mechanism-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of 5-HT1A receptor agonists: estimation of in vivo affinity and intrinsic efficacy on body temperature in rats.

Authors:  Klaas P Zuideveld; Piet H Van der Graaf; Donald Newgreen; Richard Thurlow; Nicola Petty; Paul Jordan; Lambertus A Peletier; Meindert Danhof
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2004-01-08       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 2.  Whole body pharmacokinetic models.

Authors:  Ivan Nestorov
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Identification and characterization of six new alternatively spliced variants of the human mu opioid receptor gene, Oprm.

Authors:  L Pan; J Xu; R Yu; M-M Xu; Y-X Pan; G W Pasternak
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Mechanism-based PK/PD modeling of the respiratory depressant effect of buprenorphine and fentanyl in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  A Yassen; E Olofsen; R Romberg; E Sarton; L Teppema; M Danhof; A Dahan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Mechanism-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the antinociceptive effect of buprenorphine in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Ashraf Yassen; Erik Olofsen; Raymonda Romberg; Elise Sarton; Meindert Danhof; Albert Dahan
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  A size standard for pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  N H Holford
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  What to learn from in vivo opioidergic brain imaging?

Authors:  Till Sprenger; Achim Berthele; Stefan Platzer; Henning Boecker; Thomas Rudolf Tölle
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.931

8.  Clinical actions of fentanyl and buprenorphine. The significance of receptor binding.

Authors:  R A Boas; J W Villiger
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  Mechanism-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the respiratory-depressant effect of buprenorphine and fentanyl in rats.

Authors:  Ashraf Yassen; Jingmin Kan; Erik Olofsen; Ernst Suidgeest; Albert Dahan; Meindert Danhof
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2006-07-19       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the antinociceptive effect of buprenorphine and fentanyl in rats: role of receptor equilibration kinetics.

Authors:  Ashraf Yassen; Erik Olofsen; Albert Dahan; Meindert Danhof
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 4.030

View more
  15 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of alpha interferon response induced by a Toll-like 7 receptor agonist in mice.

Authors:  Neil Benson; Joost de Jongh; Jonathan D Duckworth; Hannah M Jones; Henry E Pertinez; Jaiessh K Rawal; Tamara J van Steeg; Piet H Van der Graaf
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Dopamine D2 receptor occupancy as a predictor of catalepsy in rats: a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling approach.

Authors:  Martin Johnson; Magdalena Kozielska; Venkatesh Pilla Reddy; An Vermeulen; Hugh A Barton; Sarah Grimwood; Rik de Greef; Geny M M Groothuis; Meindert Danhof; Johannes H Proost
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 3.  Treating Chronic Pain: An Overview of Clinical Studies Centered on the Buprenorphine Option.

Authors:  Mellar P Davis; Gavril Pasternak; Bertrand Behm
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Current Approaches of Building Mechanistic Pharmacodynamic Drug-Target Binding Models.

Authors:  Jingyi Liang; Vi Ngoc-Nha Tran; Colin Hemez; Pia Abel Zur Wiesch
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

5.  Scaling the time-course of myelosuppression from rats to patients with a semi-physiological model.

Authors:  Lena E Friberg; Marie Sandström; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 3.850

6.  Mechanism-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of the reversal of buprenorphine-induced respiratory depression by naloxone : a study in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Ashraf Yassen; Erik Olofsen; Eveline van Dorp; Elise Sarton; Luc Teppema; Meindert Danhof; Albert Dahan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the effectiveness and safety of buprenorphine and fentanyl in rats.

Authors:  Ashraf Yassen; Erik Olofsen; Jingmin Kan; Albert Dahan; Meindert Danhof
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  Predictions of in vivo prolactin levels from in vitro K(i) values of D(2) receptor antagonists using an agonist-antagonist interaction model.

Authors:  Klas J Petersson; An M Vermeulen; Lena E Friberg
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 4.009

9.  Mechanism-based PK-PD model for the prolactin biological system response following an acute dopamine inhibition challenge: quantitative extrapolation to humans.

Authors:  Jasper Stevens; Bart A Ploeger; Margareta Hammarlund-Udenaes; Gunilla Osswald; Piet H van der Graaf; Meindert Danhof; Elizabeth C M de Lange
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 10.  Translational PK-PD modeling in pain.

Authors:  Ashraf Yassen; Paul Passier; Yasuhisa Furuichi; Albert Dahan
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 2.745

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.