Literature DB >> 17465640

Exposure-effect population model of inolimomab, a monoclonal antibody administered in first-line treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease.

Céline Dartois1, Gilles Freyer, Mauricette Michallet, Emilie Hénin, Benoît You, Isabelle Darlavoix, Claudine Vermot-Desroches, Brigitte Tranchand, Pascal Girard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Inolimomab, a monoclonal antibody against interleukin (IL)-2Ralpha (CD25) has shown promising results in the treatment of corticosteroid-resistant acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). The objective of the present study was to characterise the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of inolimomab as first-line treatment in this condition.
METHODS: The data came from 21 patients with acute GvHD (8 with an International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry [IBMTR] score of B, 11 with a score of C and 2 with a score of D) following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation after a median delay of 26 days (range 10-127 days). Inolimomab was administered at 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 or 0.4 mg/kg daily in association with methylprednisolone (2 mg/kg) for 8 or 16 days depending on the status at day 9. Then, for responder patients, administrations were continued three times weekly until day 28. Inolimomab concentrations and pharmacodynamic data (acute GvHD scores) were recorded during the study. The pharmacodynamic data were assessed in four grades according to the IBMTR and Glucksberg classification in parallel with Karnofsky scores. A population analysis was developed using a nonlinear mixed-effects model to define the pharmacokinetic model, to test covariates and, when apparent, to model the exposure-effect relationship by a proportional odds model. The modelling was finally qualified by a predictive check.
RESULTS: The best pharmacokinetic model was two-compartmental. For each score, the most demonstrative exposure-effect graphics linked the cumulative area under the concentration-time curve to cumulated probabilities of observing a specific score. This relationship was identified as a maximum effect model for the skin (with two patient subpopulations: sensitive/less sensitive) and a linear model for the intestinal tract and liver. No covariate was identified as influencing any of these parameters.
CONCLUSION: Inolimomab exposure-effect relationships as first-line treatment for acute GvHD have been identified and modelled. The discovered dose-effect relationship allows confirmation of the treatment response, thereby establishing the first step towards optimising the inolimomab dosage in future trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17465640      PMCID: PMC2760126          DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200746050-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  34 in total

1.  Population PKPD modelling of the long-term hypoglycaemic effect of gliclazide given as a once-a-day modified release (MR) formulation.

Authors:  N Frey; C Laveille; M Paraire; M Francillard; N H G Holford; Roeline Jochemsen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Relationship of mycophenolic acid exposure to clinical outcome after hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Authors:  Pamala Jacobson; John Rogosheske; Juliet N Barker; Kathleen Green; Juki Ng; Daniel Weisdorf; Ye Tan; Janel Long; Rory Remmel; Ronald Sawchuk; Philip McGlave
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 3.  Bone-marrow transplantation (second of two parts).

Authors:  E D Thomas; R Storb; R A Clift; A Fefer; L Johnson; P E Neiman; K G Lerner; H Glucksberg; C D Buckner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1975-04-24       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Use of monoclonal antibodies in vivo as a therapeutic strategy for acute GvHD in matched and mismatched bone marrow transplantation.

Authors:  P Herve; P Bordigoni; J Y Cahn; M Flesch; P Tiberghien; E Racadot; N Milpied; J P Bergerat; E Plouvier; C Roche
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.066

5.  A survey of the prophylaxis and treatment of acute GVHD in Europe: a report of the European Group for Blood and Marrow, Transplantation (EBMT). Chronic Leukaemia Working Party of the EBMT.

Authors:  T Ruutu; D Niederwieser; A Gratwohl; J F Apperley
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.483

6.  Risk of lymphoproliferative disorders after bone marrow transplantation: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  R E Curtis; L B Travis; P A Rowlings; G Socié; D W Kingma; P M Banks; E S Jaffe; G E Sale; M M Horowitz; R P Witherspoon; D A Shriner; D J Weisdorf; H J Kolb; K M Sullivan; K A Sobocinski; R P Gale; R N Hoover; J F Fraumeni; H J Deeg
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Busulfan systemic exposure relative to regimen-related toxicity and acute graft-versus-host disease: defining a therapeutic window for i.v. BuCy2 in chronic myelogenous leukemia.

Authors:  Borje S Andersson; Peter F Thall; Timothy Madden; Daniel Couriel; Xuemei Wang; Hai T Tran; Paolo Anderlini; Marcos de Lima; James Gajewski; Richard E Champlin
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Treatment of corticosteroid resistant acute graft-versus-host disease by in vivo administration of anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody (B-B10)

Authors:  P Hervé; J Wijdenes; J P Bergerat; P Bordigoni; N Milpied; J Y Cahn; C Clément; R Béliard; B Morel-Fourrier; E Racadot
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1990-02-15       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Treatment of moderate/severe acute graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: an analysis of clinical risk features and outcome.

Authors:  D Weisdorf; R Haake; B Blazar; W Miller; P McGlave; N Ramsay; J Kersey; A Filipovich
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1990-02-15       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease with methylprednisolone and cyclosporine with or without an anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody. A multicenter phase III study.

Authors:  J Y Cahn; P Bordigoni; P Tiberghien; N Milpied; A Brion; J Widjenes; B Lioure; G Michel; S Burdach; H J Kolb
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Population pharmacokinetics of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Nathanael L Dirks; Bernd Meibohm
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Ron J Keizer; Alwin D R Huitema; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Pharmacodynamic models for discrete data.

Authors:  Ines Paule; Pascal Girard; Gilles Freyer; Michel Tod
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Influence of dosing schedule on organ exposure to cyclosporin in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: analysis with a PBPK model.

Authors:  Cécile Gérard; Nathalie Bleyzac; Pascal Girard; Gilles Freyer; Yves Bertrand; Michel Tod
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Population pharmacokinetics of the humanised monoclonal antibody, HuHMFG1 (AS1402), derived from a phase I study on breast cancer.

Authors:  B Royer; W Yin; M Pegram; N Ibrahim; C Villanueva; D Mir; F Erlandsson; X Pivot
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Meta-Analysis of Interleukin-2 Receptor Antagonists as the Treatment for Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease.

Authors:  Meng-Zhu Shen; Jing-Xia Li; Xiao-Hui Zhang; Lan-Ping Xu; Yu Wang; Kai-Yan Liu; Xiao-Jun Huang; Shen-Da Hong; Xiao-Dong Mo
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 7.561

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.