Literature DB >> 17465265

Prognostic factors and treatment-related outcome in patients with uterine papillary serous carcinoma.

Emad R Sagr1, Dominik Denschlag, Abbas Kerim-Dikeni, Gerald Stanimir, Gerald Gitsch, Lucy Gilbert.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: A retrospective analysis was performed in order to evaluate prognostic factors and treatment-related outcome in patients with uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1989 and 2003 forty-five patients with UPSC were treated at the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), and therefore were included in the analysis. Age, race, history, tumor stage and grade, invasion and metastasis, treatment and outcome for each patient were evaluated.
RESULTS: According to FIGO classification, Stage I, II, III, and IV tumors were identified in 36%, 9%, 44%, and 11% of the patients, respectively. At the time of analysis, 37.8% of patients (17/45) were dead due to disease, with a mean survival of 22 months (SD +/- 7.5 months). Cause-specific survival for the entire group was 69%, 66%, and 58% at 2, 3, and 5 years, respectively. With respect to disease stage, 5-year cause-specific survival for stage I, II, III, and IV was 100%, 75%, 43%, and 0%, respectively. Univariate analysis comparing cause-specific survival curves demonstrated a statistically significant difference for disease stage (p < 0.0001) and depth of myometrial invasion (p = 0.008). However, in multivariate analysis, only disease stage had a significant impact on cause-specific survival (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Disease stage is the only independent significant prognostic factor regarding cause-specific survival in patients with UPSC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17465265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  7 in total

1.  Prognostic factors in stages II/III/IV and stages III/IV endometrioid and serous adenocarcinoma of the endometrium.

Authors:  P Mhawech-Fauceglia; R F Herrmann; J Kesterson; I Izevbaye; S Lele; K Odunsi
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.424

2.  A clinical and pathologic comparison between stage-matched endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma and uterine serous carcinoma: is there a difference?

Authors:  June Y Hou; Thomas C McAndrew; Gary L Goldberg; Kathleen Whitney; Shohreh Shahabi
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 3.060

3.  Factors associated with Type I and Type II endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Ashley S Felix; Joel L Weissfeld; Roslyn A Stone; Robert Bowser; Mamatha Chivukula; Robert P Edwards; Faina Linkov
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 4.  Review of Recommended Treatment of Uterine Carcinosarcoma.

Authors:  Joseph Menczer
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2015-11

5.  Insights into endometrial serous carcinogenesis and progression.

Authors:  Oluwole Fadare; Wenxin Zheng
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2009-01-10

6.  Etiologic heterogeneity in endometrial cancer: evidence from a Gynecologic Oncology Group trial.

Authors:  Louise A Brinton; Ashley S Felix; D Scott McMeekin; William T Creasman; Mark E Sherman; David Mutch; David E Cohn; Joan L Walker; Richard G Moore; Levi S Downs; Robert A Soslow; Richard Zaino
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  A novel model to predict cancer-specific survival in patients with early-stage uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC).

Authors:  Lihua Chen; Xiaona Liu; Mengjiao Li; Shuoer Wang; Hongyu Zhou; Lei Liu; Xi Cheng
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 4.452

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.