OBJECTIVE: We conducted a study in out-patient pharmacies in South-eastern Nigeria in order to determine the extent of self-medication of antimicrobial agents in this area, assess the dosing error associated with this practice and to ascertain the extent of involvement of community pharmacies. METHOD: A survey was carried out daily in selected community pharmacies for a period of 90 days. Data were collected on the number of patients visiting these shops for antimicrobial agents, the number getting their medication with a prescription, the number getting their order without prescription and on the type and dose of antimicrobial agents received. MAIN OUT-COME MEASURE: The percentage of patients with prescription and without prescription was compared. The percentage under-dosages or over-dosages associated with how each antimicrobial agent was obtained were compared. The total DDDs of antimicrobial agents dispensed within this period with and without prescription were compared. RESULTS: A total of 4,128 outpatients visited the shops for antimicrobial agents within the period and were involved in the study. Of this number, 1,742 (42.2%) came with a prescription from qualified medical personnel and 2,386 (57.8%) came without a prescription. A total of 13,693.13 DDDs of antimicrobial agents was dispensed, of which 56.38% was dispensed with prescription and 43.62% was dispensed without prescription. The degrees of under-dosing were significantly (P < 0.05) higher in regimen filled without prescription when compared to those filled with prescription. CONCLUSION: Majority of the patients in this region still obtains their antimicrobial agents without a proper prescription, which is associated with sub-therapeutic dosing of these agents. There is a need for better regulation of antimicrobial agents dispensing and utilization in the region.
OBJECTIVE: We conducted a study in out-patient pharmacies in South-eastern Nigeria in order to determine the extent of self-medication of antimicrobial agents in this area, assess the dosing error associated with this practice and to ascertain the extent of involvement of community pharmacies. METHOD: A survey was carried out daily in selected community pharmacies for a period of 90 days. Data were collected on the number of patients visiting these shops for antimicrobial agents, the number getting their medication with a prescription, the number getting their order without prescription and on the type and dose of antimicrobial agents received. MAIN OUT-COME MEASURE: The percentage of patients with prescription and without prescription was compared. The percentage under-dosages or over-dosages associated with how each antimicrobial agent was obtained were compared. The total DDDs of antimicrobial agents dispensed within this period with and without prescription were compared. RESULTS: A total of 4,128 outpatients visited the shops for antimicrobial agents within the period and were involved in the study. Of this number, 1,742 (42.2%) came with a prescription from qualified medical personnel and 2,386 (57.8%) came without a prescription. A total of 13,693.13 DDDs of antimicrobial agents was dispensed, of which 56.38% was dispensed with prescription and 43.62% was dispensed without prescription. The degrees of under-dosing were significantly (P < 0.05) higher in regimen filled without prescription when compared to those filled with prescription. CONCLUSION: Majority of the patients in this region still obtains their antimicrobial agents without a proper prescription, which is associated with sub-therapeutic dosing of these agents. There is a need for better regulation of antimicrobial agents dispensing and utilization in the region.
Authors: M A Lansang; R Lucas-Aquino; T E Tupasi; V S Mina; L S Salazar; N Juban; T T Limjoco; L E Nisperos; C M Kunin Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 1990 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: D Guillemot; C Carbon; B Balkau; P Geslin; H Lecoeur; F Vauzelle-Kervroëdan; G Bouvenot; E Eschwége Journal: JAMA Date: 1998-02-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Larissa Grigoryan; Flora M Haaijer-Ruskamp; Johannes G M Burgerhof; Reli Mechtler; Reginald Deschepper; Arjana Tambic-Andrasevic; Retnosari Andrajati; Dominique L Monnet; Robert Cunney; Antonella Di Matteo; Hana Edelsein; Rolanda Valinteliene; Alaa Alkerwi; Elizabeth Scicluna; Powel Grzesiowski; Ana-Claudia Bara; Thomas Tesar; Milan Cizman; Jose Campos; Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg; Joan Birkin Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Daniel J Morgan; Iruka N Okeke; Ramanan Laxminarayan; Eli N Perencevich; Scott Weisenberg Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2011-06-12 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Sara Elizabeth Boyd; Luke Stephen Prockter Moore; Mark Gilchrist; Ceire Costelloe; Enrique Castro-Sánchez; Bryony Dean Franklin; Alison Helen Holmes Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Meghan Prin; Lauren Onofrey; Laura Purcell; Clement Kadyaudzu; Anthony Charles Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2020-04-23 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Jackson K Mukonzo; Proscovia M Namuwenge; Gildo Okure; Benjamin Mwesige; Olivia K Namusisi; David Mukanga Journal: J Multidiscip Healthc Date: 2013-08-20