Baukje Miedema1, Ryan Hamilton, Julie Easley. 1. Dalhousie University Family Medicine Teaching Unit, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada. bo.miedema@rvh.nb.ca
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Little research has been undertaken regarding the psychological impact of cancer on those stricken during the young adult years. Specifically, research on the coping strategies of young adults with cancer is limited. METHOD: In this qualitative, Grounded Theory study, we did not set out to examine coping; rather, it emerged as a major phenomenon in the analysis of interview data from 15 young adults with cancer. RESULTS: These young adults used various coping strategies to come to terms with the cancer diagnosis, management of the illness, its treatment, and treatment sequelae. The coping strategies varied considerably from person to person, depended on the stage(s) of the illness, and were rooted in their precancer lives. We were able to discern a pattern of coping strategies used by most participants. The prevailing goal for all participants was to achieve what they called "normalcy." For some, this meant major changes in their lives; for others it meant to "pick up" where they had left off before the cancer diagnosis. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: To aid the understanding of the issues that influence coping, we have developed a model to illustrate the bidirectional nature and the complexities of the coping strategies as they relate to the phases of the disease and the disease treatment. The model also affirms Folkman and Lazarus' coping theory.
OBJECTIVE: Little research has been undertaken regarding the psychological impact of cancer on those stricken during the young adult years. Specifically, research on the coping strategies of young adults with cancer is limited. METHOD: In this qualitative, Grounded Theory study, we did not set out to examine coping; rather, it emerged as a major phenomenon in the analysis of interview data from 15 young adults with cancer. RESULTS: These young adults used various coping strategies to come to terms with the cancer diagnosis, management of the illness, its treatment, and treatment sequelae. The coping strategies varied considerably from person to person, depended on the stage(s) of the illness, and were rooted in their precancer lives. We were able to discern a pattern of coping strategies used by most participants. The prevailing goal for all participants was to achieve what they called "normalcy." For some, this meant major changes in their lives; for others it meant to "pick up" where they had left off before the cancer diagnosis. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: To aid the understanding of the issues that influence coping, we have developed a model to illustrate the bidirectional nature and the complexities of the coping strategies as they relate to the phases of the disease and the disease treatment. The model also affirms Folkman and Lazarus' coping theory.
Authors: Bibi Hølge-Hazelton; Helle U Timm; Christian Graugaard; Kirsten A Boisen; Cecilie Dyg Sperling Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-06-28 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Marie Barnett; Glynnis McDonnell; Antonio DeRosa; Tammy Schuler; Errol Philip; Lisa Peterson; Kaitlin Touza; Sabrina Jhanwar; Thomas M Atkinson; Jennifer S Ford Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2016-02-26 Impact factor: 4.442