Margaret A Gates1, Diane Feskanich, Frank E Speizer, Susan E Hankinson. 1. Department of Medicine, Bridham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Channing Laboratory, Third Floor, 181 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA. mgates@hsph.harvard.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Smoke generated during laser surgery and electrocautery contains respiratory irritants and human carcinogens. Although laboratory and animal studies have demonstrated that this smoke has inflammatory and mutagenic potential, no population-based studies of the health effects of exposure to surgical smoke have been published. We examined the association between duration of employment as an operating room nurse, a proxy measure for surgical smoke exposure, and subsequent lung cancer risk. METHODS: This study was conducted among 86 747 women in the Nurses' Health Study. Information on the duration of prior operating room employment was collected in 1984, and the women were followed for incident, confirmed lung cancer. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to model the incidence rate ratio of lung cancer for each exposure category using women with no prior operating room employment for comparison. All of the models were adjusted for age, smoking history, passive smoke exposure, fruit and vegetable consumption, and alpha carotene and lycopene intake. RESULTS: A history of operating room employment was not associated with an increased rate of lung cancer in multivariable analyses [rate ratio (RR) 0.99, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.86-1.15]. In fact, nurses in the highest exposure category, > or =15 years of operating room employment, had a significantly lower rate of lung cancer than nurses with no prior operating room employment (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37-0.91), possibly due to confounding by overall health status or residual confounding by smoking history. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term exposure to surgical smoke, as measured by the duration of operating room employment, does not appear to increase the risk of lung cancer.
OBJECTIVES: Smoke generated during laser surgery and electrocautery contains respiratory irritants and human carcinogens. Although laboratory and animal studies have demonstrated that this smoke has inflammatory and mutagenic potential, no population-based studies of the health effects of exposure to surgical smoke have been published. We examined the association between duration of employment as an operating room nurse, a proxy measure for surgical smoke exposure, and subsequent lung cancer risk. METHODS: This study was conducted among 86 747 women in the Nurses' Health Study. Information on the duration of prior operating room employment was collected in 1984, and the women were followed for incident, confirmed lung cancer. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to model the incidence rate ratio of lung cancer for each exposure category using women with no prior operating room employment for comparison. All of the models were adjusted for age, smoking history, passive smoke exposure, fruit and vegetable consumption, and alpha carotene and lycopene intake. RESULTS: A history of operating room employment was not associated with an increased rate of lung cancer in multivariable analyses [rate ratio (RR) 0.99, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.86-1.15]. In fact, nurses in the highest exposure category, > or =15 years of operating room employment, had a significantly lower rate of lung cancer than nurses with no prior operating room employment (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37-0.91), possibly due to confounding by overall health status or residual confounding by smoking history. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term exposure to surgical smoke, as measured by the duration of operating room employment, does not appear to increase the risk of lung cancer.
Authors: Nicole Le Moual; Raphaëlle Varraso; Jan Paul Zock; Paul Henneberger; Frank E Speizer; Francine Kauffmann; Carlos A Camargo Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Emily J Eshleman; Mallory LeBlanc; Lisa B Rokoff; Yinyin Xu; Rui Hu; Kachiu Lee; Gary S Chuang; Gary Adamkiewicz; Jaime E Hart Journal: Environ Health Date: 2017-03-29 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: Markus Karjalainen; Anton Kontunen; Sampo Saari; Topi Rönkkö; Jukka Lekkala; Antti Roine; Niku Oksala Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-04-12 Impact factor: 3.240