Literature DB >> 17460673

How swifts control their glide performance with morphing wings.

D Lentink1, U K Müller, E J Stamhuis, R de Kat, W van Gestel, L L M Veldhuis, P Henningsson, A Hedenström, J J Videler, J L van Leeuwen.   

Abstract

Gliding birds continually change the shape and size of their wings, presumably to exploit the profound effect of wing morphology on aerodynamic performance. That birds should adjust wing sweep to suit glide speed has been predicted qualitatively by analytical glide models, which extrapolated the wing's performance envelope from aerodynamic theory. Here we describe the aerodynamic and structural performance of actual swift wings, as measured in a wind tunnel, and on this basis build a semi-empirical glide model. By measuring inside and outside swifts' behavioural envelope, we show that choosing the most suitable sweep can halve sink speed or triple turning rate. Extended wings are superior for slow glides and turns; swept wings are superior for fast glides and turns. This superiority is due to better aerodynamic performance-with the exception of fast turns. Swept wings are less effective at generating lift while turning at high speeds, but can bear the extreme loads. Finally, our glide model predicts that cost-effective gliding occurs at speeds of 8-10 m s(-1), whereas agility-related figures of merit peak at 15-25 m s(-1). In fact, swifts spend the night ('roost') in flight at 8-10 m s(-1) (ref. 11), thus our model can explain this choice for a resting behaviour. Morphing not only adjusts birds' wing performance to the task at hand, but could also control the flight of future aircraft.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17460673     DOI: 10.1038/nature05733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  39 in total

1.  Biomechanics: Swimming in the Sahara.

Authors:  Stephanie B Crofts; Adam P Summers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Wing morphing allows gulls to modulate static pitch stability during gliding.

Authors:  C Harvey; V B Baliga; P Lavoie; D L Altshuler
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  How pigeons couple three-dimensional elbow and wrist motion to morph their wings.

Authors:  Amanda K Stowers; Laura Y Matloff; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 4.  Inspiration for wing design: how forelimb specialization enables active flight in modern vertebrates.

Authors:  Diana D Chin; Laura Y Matloff; Amanda Kay Stowers; Emily R Tucci; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Social eavesdropping allows for a more risky gliding strategy by thermal-soaring birds.

Authors:  Hannah J Williams; Andrew J King; Olivier Duriez; Luca Börger; Emily L C Shepard
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Characteristics of the alula in relation to wing and body size in the Laridae and Sternidae.

Authors:  Sang-Im Lee; Haecheon Choi
Journal:  Anim Cells Syst (Seoul)       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 1.815

7.  The fish tail motion forms an attached leading edge vortex.

Authors:  Iman Borazjani; Mohsen Daghooghi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Hummingbird wing efficacy depends on aspect ratio and compares with helicopter rotors.

Authors:  Jan W Kruyt; Elsa M Quicazán-Rubio; GertJan F van Heijst; Douglas L Altshuler; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Power of the wingbeat: modelling the effects of flapping wings in vertebrate flight.

Authors:  M Klein Heerenbrink; L C Johansson; A Hedenström
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.704

10.  Hydraulic control of tuna fins: A role for the lymphatic system in vertebrate locomotion.

Authors:  Vadim Pavlov; Benyamin Rosental; Nathaniel F Hansen; Jody M Beers; George Parish; Ian Rowbotham; Barbara A Block
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.