Literature DB >> 17460145

Mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine for prevention of chronic allograft dysfunction in renal transplantation: the MYSS follow-up randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Giuseppe Remuzzi1, Paolo Cravedi, Marco Costantini, Mariadomenica Lesti, Maria Ganeva, Giulia Gherardi, Bogdan Ene-Iordache, Eliana Gotti, Donato Donati, Maurizio Salvadori, Silvio Sandrini, Giuseppe Segoloni, Stefano Federico, Paolo Rigotti, Vito Sparacino, Piero Ruggenenti.   

Abstract

The Mycophenolate Steroids Sparing (MYSS) study found that in renal transplant recipients who were on immunosuppressive therapy with the cyclosporine microemulsion Neoral, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was not better than azathioprine in preventing acute rejection at 21 mo after transplantation and was 15 times more expensive. The MYSS Follow-up Study, an extension of MYSS, was aimed at comparing long-term outcome of 248 MYSS patients according to their original randomization to MMF (1 g twice daily) or azathioprine (75 to 100 mg/d). Primary outcome was estimated GFR at 5 yr after transplantation. Mean 5-yr GFR difference between azathioprine and mycophenolate was 4.67 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.43 to 9.77 ml/min per 1.73 m(2); P = 0.07). GFR from month 6 (mean +/- SEM: 54.3 +/- 1.6 versus 53.9 +/- 1.5 ml/min per 1.73 m(2); P = 0.83) to month 72 after transplantation (49.5 +/- 2.2 versus 47.3 +/- 2.4 ml/min per 1.73 m(2); P = 0.50); GFR slopes (mean +/- SEM: -1.10 +/- 0.56 versus -1.23 +/- 0.31 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) per year; P = 0.83); and 72-mo patient mortality (4.0 versus 4.0% [P = 0.95]; HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.28 to 3.31; P = 0.95), graft loss (6.8 versus 6.1% [P = 0.82]; HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.32 to 2.46; P = 0.83), incidence of persistent proteinuria (25.0 versus 27.4%; P = 0.72), late (>6 mo after transplantation) rejections (25.3 versus 21.2%; P = 0.53), and adverse events were similar on azathioprine (n = 124) and MMF (n = 124), respectively. Outcomes in the two groups were comparable also among patients with or without steroid therapy, considered separately. In kidney transplantation, the long-term risk/benefit profile of MMF and azathioprine therapy in combination with cyclosporine Neoral is similar. In view of the cost, standard immunosuppression regimens for kidney transplantation should perhaps include azathioprine rather than MMF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17460145     DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2006101153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  23 in total

1.  Glomerular disease: perspectives on maintenance therapy in lupus nephritis.

Authors:  James E Balow
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 28.314

2.  A single daily dose enhances the adherence to immunosuppressive treatment in kidney transplant recipients: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yoshitsugu Obi; Naotsugu Ichimaru; Taigo Kato; Jun-Ya Kaimori; Masayoshi Okumi; Koji Yazawa; Hiromi Rakugi; Norio Nonomura; Yoshitaka Isaka; Shiro Takahara
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 2.801

Review 3.  Drug development: how academia, industry and authorities interact.

Authors:  Silvio Garattini; Norberto Perico
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 28.314

4.  West Meets East.

Authors:  Giuseppe Remuzzi
Journal:  Kidney Dis (Basel)       Date:  2015-04-24

Review 5.  Immunosuppressive drugs in kidney transplantation: impact on patient survival, and incidence of cardiovascular disease, malignancy and infection.

Authors:  Roberto Marcén
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Tolerance-inducing immunosuppressive strategies in clinical transplantation: an overview.

Authors:  Dela Golshayan; Manuel Pascual
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  ABCB1 genotypes predict cyclosporine-related adverse events and kidney allograft outcome.

Authors:  Dario Cattaneo; Piero Ruggenenti; Sara Baldelli; Nicola Motterlini; Eliana Gotti; Silvio Sandrini; Maurizio Salvadori; Giuseppe Segoloni; Paolo Rigotti; Donato Donati; Norberto Perico; Giuseppe Remuzzi
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 8.  [Immunosuppression and its use in kidney transplantation].

Authors:  A Paliege; J Bamoulid; F Bachmann; O Staeck; F Halleck; D Khadzhynov; S Brakemeier; M Dürr; K Budde
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Monitoring of nonsteroidal immunosuppressive drugs in patients with lung disease and lung transplant recipients: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Robert P Baughman; Keith C Meyer; Ian Nathanson; Luis Angel; Sangeeta M Bhorade; Kevin M Chan; Daniel Culver; Christopher G Harrod; Mary S Hayney; Kristen B Highland; Andrew H Limper; Herbert Patrick; Charlie Strange; Timothy Whelan
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Mycophenolic acid formulations in adult renal transplantation - update on efficacy and tolerability.

Authors:  Déla Golshayan; M Pascual; Bruno Vogt
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.