Literature DB >> 19852526

Immunosuppressive drugs in kidney transplantation: impact on patient survival, and incidence of cardiovascular disease, malignancy and infection.

Roberto Marcén1.   

Abstract

Renal transplant recipients have increased mortality rates when compared with the general population. The new immunosuppressive drugs have improved short-term patient survival up to 95% at 1-2 years, but these data have to be confirmed in long-term follow-up. Furthermore, no particular regimen has proved to be superior over others with regard to patient survival. Cardiovascular diseases are the most common cause of mortality in renal transplant recipients and while no immunosuppressive drug has been directly associated with cardiovascular events, immunosuppressive drugs have different impacts on traditional risk factors. Corticosteroids and ciclosporin are the agents with the most negative impact on weight gain, blood pressure and lipids. Tacrolimus increases the risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus. Sirolimus and everolimus have the most impact on risk factors for post-transplant hyperlipidaemia. Modifications in immunosuppression could improve the cardiovascular profile but there is little evidence regarding the beneficial effects of these changes on patient outcomes. Malignancies are also an increasing cause of mortality, overtaking cardiovascular disease in some series. Induction therapy, azathioprine and calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are probably the immunosuppressive agents most linked with post-transplant malignancies. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has no negative impact on the incidence of malignancies. Target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors have antioncogenic properties and they are associated with a lower incidence of malignancies. In addition, these agents have been recommended for use to decrease the dose or withdrawal of CNIs in patients with malignancies. Infections are still an important cause of morbidity and mortality in renal transplant recipients. Some immunosuppressive agents such as MMF increase the incidence of cytomegalovirus infection and the need for prophylactic measures in risk recipients. The use of potent immunosuppressive therapy has resulted in the appearance of BK virus nephropathy, which progresses to graft failure in a high percentage of patients. Although first associated with tacrolimus and MMF immunosuppression, recent data suggest that BK nephropathy appears with any kind of triple therapy. In conclusion, reducing risk factors for patient death should be a major target to improve outcomes after renal transplantation. Effort should be made to control cardiovascular diseases, malignancies and infections with improved use of immunosuppressive drugs. Preliminary results with belatacept suggest its safety and efficacy, and open new perspectives in the immunosuppression of de novo renal transplant recipients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19852526     DOI: 10.2165/11319260-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  186 in total

1.  Risk of lymphoma after renal transplantation varies with time: an analysis of the United States Renal Data System.

Authors:  Jodi M Smith; Kyle Rudser; Daniel Gillen; Bryan Kestenbaum; Steven Seliger; Noel Weiss; Ruth A McDonald; Connie L Davis; Catherine Stehmen-Breen
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2006-01-27       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Posttransplant diabetes mellitus in renal allograft recipients: A prospective multicenter study at 2 years.

Authors:  R Marcén; J M Morales; D del Castillo; J M Campistol; D Serón; F Valdés; F Anaya; A Andrés; M Arias; J Bustamante; L Capdevila; F Escuin; S Gil-Vernet; M Gonzalez-Molina; I Lampreave; F Oppenheimer; L Pallardó
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.066

3.  Prospective registry-based observational cohort study of the long-term risk of malignancies in renal transplant patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil.

Authors:  R Robson; J M Cecka; G Opelz; M Budde; S Sacks
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Prednisone withdrawal in kidney transplant recipients on cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil--a prospective randomized study. Steroid Withdrawal Study Group.

Authors:  N Ahsan; D Hricik; A Matas; S Rose; S Tomlanovich; A Wilkinson; M Ewell; M McIntosh; D Stablein; E Hodge
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1999-12-27       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Sirolimus does not exhibit nephrotoxicity compared to cyclosporine in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  José M Morales; Lars Wramner; Henri Kreis; Dominique Durand; Josep M Campistol; Amado Andres; Joaquin Arenas; Eric Nègre; James T Burke; Carl G Groth
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  A randomized trial comparing triple-drug and double-drug therapy in renal transplantation. Analysis at 7 years.

Authors:  G Montagnino; A Tarantino; G Banfi; A Aroldi; B Cesana; C Ponticelli
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1994-07-27       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Analysis of the cardiovascular risk profile in stable kidney transplant recipients after 50% cyclosporine reduction.

Authors:  Waichi Wong; Nina Tolkoff-Rubin; Francis L Delmonico; Francesca Cardarelli; Susan L Saidman; Mary Lin Farrell; Vivian Shih; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; A Benedict Cosimi; Manuel Pascual
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.863

8.  Tacrolimus combined with two different dosages of sirolimus in kidney transplantation: results of a multicenter study.

Authors:  S Vitko; Z Wlodarczyk; L Kyllönen; Z Czajkowski; R Margreiter; L Backman; F Perner; P Rigotti; B Jaques; D Abramowicz; M Kessler; J Sanchez-Plumed; L Rostaing; R S Rodger; D Donati; Y Vanrenterghem
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  Graft and patient survival in kidney transplant recipients selected for de novo steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression.

Authors:  F L Luan; D E Steffick; C Gadegbeku; S P Norman; R Wolfe; A O Ojo
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  A randomized trial of cyclosporine and prednisolone versus cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisolone in primary cadaveric renal transplantation.

Authors:  A Lindholm; D Albrechtsen; G Tufveson; I Karlberg; N H Persson; C G Groth
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  76 in total

1.  New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus After Transplantation in a Cynomolgus Macaque (Macaca fasicularis).

Authors:  Kristin A Matthews; Makoto Tonsho; Joren C Madsen
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 0.982

Review 2.  T-regulatory cell-mediated immune tolerance as a potential immunotherapeutic strategy to facilitate graft survival.

Authors:  Mohammad A Khan; Sana Moeez; Suhail Akhtar
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Quantifying the medication burden of kidney transplant recipients in the first year post-transplantation.

Authors:  Jac Kee Low; Kimberley Crawford; Elizabeth Manias; Allison Williams
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2018-06-28

4.  Impact of the CYP3A5 genotype on the distributions of dose-adjusted trough concentrations and incidence of rejection in Japanese renal transplant recipients receiving different tacrolimus formulations.

Authors:  Takenori Niioka; Hideaki Kagaya; Mitsuru Saito; Takamitsu Inoue; Kazuyuki Numakura; Ryohei Yamamoto; Tomonori Habuchi; Shigeru Satoh; Masatomo Miura
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 2.801

5.  [Modern immunosuppression after solid organ transplantation].

Authors:  J Beimler; C Morath; M Zeier
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 0.743

6.  Long-term results in recipients of combined HLA-mismatched kidney and bone marrow transplantation without maintenance immunosuppression.

Authors:  T Kawai; D H Sachs; B Sprangers; T R Spitzer; S L Saidman; E Zorn; N Tolkoff-Rubin; F Preffer; K Crisalli; B Gao; W Wong; H Morris; S A LoCascio; P Sayre; B Shonts; W W Williams; R-N Smith; R B Colvin; M Sykes; A B Cosimi
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 7.  Immune monitoring as prerequisite for transplantation tolerance trials.

Authors:  K Behnam Sani; B Sawitzki
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Risk factors and incidence of malignant neoplasms after kidney transplantation at a single institution in Japan.

Authors:  Kengo Horie; Tomohiro Tsuchiya; Koji Iinuma; Yuka Maekawa; Keita Nakane; Taku Kato; Kosuke Mizutani; Takuya Koie
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.801

9.  BD750, a benzothiazole derivative, inhibits T cell proliferation by affecting the JAK3/STAT5 signalling pathway.

Authors:  Y Liu; T Yang; H Li; M-H Li; J Liu; Y-T Wang; S-X Yang; J Zheng; X-Y Luo; Y Lai; P Yang; L-M Li; Q Zou
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 10.  Obesity and metabolic syndrome in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Heather LaGuardia; Rubin Zhang
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.