Literature DB >> 17459366

Seasonal variation of arsenic concentration in wells in Nevada.

Josef G Thundiyil1, Yan Yuan, Allan H Smith, Craig Steinmaus.   

Abstract

The issue of seasonal arsenic measurement variability poses consequences regarding the interpretation and frequency of well water measurements for both public health research and surveillance. In this study, we evaluated seasonal variability in arsenic concentration in 356 wells in western Nevada. River flow data obtained from US Geological Survey National Water Information System were used to classify seasons as wet or dry, and mean differences in arsenic well concentrations measured during these seasons were compared. Arsenic concentrations in these wells averaged 72.9 microg/L (range, non-detect to 3000 microg/L). The mean difference in arsenic concentrations between the wet and dry seasons was -3.3 microg/L (p = 0.78; average percent difference = 2.3%). Eighty wells (22%) had higher arsenic concentrations in the wet season, 75 wells (21%) had higher arsenic concentrations in the dry season and no difference was seen in 201 wells (56%). The mean differences in wells with arsenic levels of 0-10, 11-50, 51-200, > 200 microg/L were -1.4 microg/L(p=0.43), 9.2 microg/L(p=0.36), 15.1 microg/L(p=0.30), and -49.9 microg/L(p=0.59). In summary, although changes in arsenic concentrations were seen in some wells, clear trends in arsenic concentration over time were not associated with the wet and dry seasons. These findings provide evidence that, in our study area as a whole, little seasonal variability occurs in arsenic concentrations, and repeated assessments of arsenic concentrations based on season might add little value to the accuracy of health effects research or public health surveillance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17459366     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2007.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  6 in total

1.  Assessment of some potential harmful trace elements (PHTEs) in the borehole water of Greater Giyani, Limpopo Province, South Africa: possible implications for human health.

Authors:  Portia Munyangane; Hassina Mouri; Jan Kramers
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Approaches to increase arsenic awareness in Bangladesh: an evaluation of an arsenic education program.

Authors:  Christine Marie George; Pam Factor-Litvak; Khalid Khan; Tariqul Islam; Ashit Singha; Joyce Moon-Howard; Alexander van Geen; Joseph H Graziano
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2012-09-14

3.  Quantification of inorganic arsenic exposure and cancer risk via consumption of vegetables in southern selected districts of Pakistan.

Authors:  Zahir Ur Rehman; Sardar Khan; Kun Qin; Mark L Brusseau; Mohammad Tahir Shah; Islamud Din
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Water Quality Index for measuring drinking water quality in rural Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Tahera Akter; Fatema Tuz Jhohura; Fahmida Akter; Tridib Roy Chowdhury; Sabuj Kanti Mistry; Digbijoy Dey; Milan Kanti Barua; Md Akramul Islam; Mahfuzar Rahman
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Recommended Sampling Intervals for Arsenic in Private Wells.

Authors:  Brian J Mailloux; Nicholas A Procopio; Mark Bakker; Therese Chen; Imtiaz Choudhury; Kazi Matin Ahmed; M Rajib H Mozumder; Tyler Ellis; Steve Chillrud; Alexander van Geen
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 2.671

6.  The broad scope of health effects from chronic arsenic exposure: update on a worldwide public health problem.

Authors:  Marisa F Naujokas; Beth Anderson; Habibul Ahsan; H Vasken Aposhian; Joseph H Graziano; Claudia Thompson; William A Suk
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.