Literature DB >> 17458679

Is retention of a nasogastric tube after esophagectomy a risk factor for postoperative respiratory tract infection?

Takeshi Sato1, Tadatoshi Takayama, Keio So, Isao Murayama.   

Abstract

Between 1990 and 2004, 149 patients underwent esophagectomy with thoracotomy at our institution. Because the retention of a nasogastric tube postoperatively impedes expectoration, this practice was abolished in 1997, in order to reduce the risk of respiratory tract infection (RTI). Since 1998, we have instead performed gastrostomy for decompression. In this retrospective study, we compared the incidence of postoperative respiratory tract infection between these two groups. We previously demonstrated that the concordance between bacteria detected in the gastric juices and those detected in sputum was more than 70% in patients with postoperative RTI. In the present study, the incidence of postoperative respiratory tract infection was significantly higher in patients in whom a nasogastric tube was retained when compared to the rate in those for whom gastrostomy was performed instead (41.5% [34/82] vs 26.9% [18/67]; P = 0.045). The rate of other infections did not differ significantly between the two groups. We conclude that, in the postoperative management of esophagectomy, the retention of a nasogastric tube impedes expectoration. In addition, nasogastric tubes appear to increase the risk of postoperative RTI, considering the previous finding that the concordance of bacteria in sputum and gastric secretion was over 70%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17458679     DOI: 10.1007/s10156-007-0504-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Chemother        ISSN: 1341-321X            Impact factor:   2.211


  4 in total

1.  Analysis of the Effect of Early Versus Conventional Nasogastric Tube Removal on Postoperative Complications After Transthoracic Esophagectomy: A Single-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Masato Hayashi; Hirofumi Kawakubo; Yoshiaki Shoji; Syuhei Mayanagi; Rieko Nakamura; Koichi Suda; Norihito Wada; Hiroya Takeuchi; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Diagnostic evaluation, surgical technique, and perioperative management after esophagectomy: consensus statement of the German Advanced Surgical Treatment Study Group.

Authors:  Daniel Palmes; Matthias Brüwer; Franz G Bader; Michael Betzler; Heinz Becker; Hans-Peter Bruch; Markus Büchler; Heinz Buhr; Beta Michael Ghadimi; Ulrich T Hopt; Ralf Konopke; Katja Ott; Stefan Post; Jörg-Peter Ritz; Ulrich Ronellenfitsch; Hans-Detlev Saeger; Norbert Senninger
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Comparison of pulmonary function changes between patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy prior to minimally invasive esophagectomy: a randomized and controlled trial.

Authors:  Xiaosang Chen; Mingjun Du; Han Tang; Hao Wang; Yong Fang; Miao Lin; Jun Yin; Lijie Tan; Yaxing Shen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Contrast-Enhanced Radiologic Evaluation of Gastric Conduit Emptying After Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Minke L Feenstra; Lily Alkemade; Janneke E van den Bergh; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Freek Daams; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Wietse J Eshuis
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 4.339

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.