Literature DB >> 17458613

Surgery for obesity: a review of the current state of the art and future directions.

Stephen S McNatt1, James J Longhi, Charles D Goldman, David W McFadden.   

Abstract

The number of patients undergoing surgery for the treatment of obesity, and the proportion of the health care budget dedicated to this health problem, is growing exponentially. There are several competing surgical approaches for the management of morbid obesity. We review the literature relating to four of these: gastric bypass, biliopancreatic diversion, gastric banding, and gastric pacing. Our review finds that while enhancing the malabsorptive activity of these procedures may induce an incremental increase in excess body weight loss, the proportion of patients who fail to lose more than 50% of their excess body weight is similar no matter how radical is the surgery performed. There is little guidance from the literature as to appropriate patient selection for the varying procedures, and anonymously reported registries have yet to show that patients who undergo bariatric surgery have enhanced longevity. To date, the bariatric surgical community has not conducted adequately powered randomized prospective trials to elucidate key elements of the surgical procedure such as optimal bypass length, to determine whether mixed operations are superior to those that offer intake restriction only, and to define what constitutes success after bariatric surgery. As a public health measure, bariatric surgery in the United States is being pursued in an irrational manner, being concentrated in areas where there are fewer morbidly obese patients, and used disproportionately among the population of white obese females.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17458613     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-006-0053-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.267


  111 in total

Review 1.  A step-by-step guide to placement of the LAP-BAND adjustable gastric banding system.

Authors:  George A Fielding; Jeff W Allen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 2.  Alterations in gastrointestinal physiology after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Todd A Ponsky; Fredrick Brody; Edward Pucci
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Research update and opportunities III.

Authors:  John B Dixon
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.734

4.  The Lap-Band is an effective tool for weight loss even in the United States.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Holloway; Glen A Forney; Dorothy E Gould
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Malabsorptive procedures for severe obesity: comparison of pancreaticobiliary bypass and very very long limb Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  M M Murr; B M Balsiger; F P Kennedy; J L Mai; M G Sarr
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  [Behavior of plasma enteroglucagon and neurotensin in obese patients subjected to biliopancreatic bypass].

Authors:  E Gianetta; S R Bloom; D L Sarson; D Civalleri; U Bonalumi; F Griffanti Bartoli; D Friedman; L Pitton; P L Binda; R Degrandi; N Scopinaro
Journal:  Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper       Date:  1980-10-15

7.  Jejunoileal bypass changes the duodenal cholecystokinin and somatostatin cell density.

Authors:  Leif Ockander; Jan L Hedenbro; Jens F Rehfeld; Kristina Sjölund
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Roux-en-Y divided gastric bypass results in the same weight loss as duodenal switch for morbid obesity.

Authors:  Clifford W Deveney; David MacCabee; Katherine Marlink; Kenneth Welker; Justin Davis; Donald B McConnell
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  The use of polypropylene mesh in midline incision closure following gastric by-pass surgery reduces the risk of postoperative hernia.

Authors:  Janusz Strzelczyk; Leszek Czupryniak; Jerzy Loba; Janusz Wasiak
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2002-10-23       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding at a U.S. center with up to 3-year follow-up.

Authors:  Richard B Rubenstein
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.129

View more
  5 in total

1.  Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass: short-term single-institute experience.

Authors:  Luigi Piazza; Francesco Ferrara; Silvana Leanza; Danilo Coco; Salvatore Sarvà; Angelo Bellia; Carla Di Stefano; Francesco Basile; Antonio Biondi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2011-11-22

2.  Validation that a 1-year fellowship in minimally invasive and bariatric surgery can eliminate the learning curve for laparoscopic gastric bypass.

Authors:  Mohamed R Ali; David S Tichansky; Shanu N Kothari; Corrigan L McBride; Adolfo Z Fernandez; Harvey J Sugerman; John M Kellum; Luke G Wolfe; Eric J DeMaria
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Perianesthetic considerations in laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Jin Young Lee; Sung Jin Hong; Ji Young Lee; Jeong Hee Shin
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2011-01-28

4.  Succinylcholine: a drug to avoid in bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Talar Tejirian; Catherine E Lewis; James Conner; Candice Jensen; Erik Dutson; Amir Mehran
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  The surgical management of obesity with emphasis on the role of post operative imaging.

Authors:  F Hampson; M Sinclair; S Smith
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2011-01-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.