Literature DB >> 15135686

Roux-en-Y divided gastric bypass results in the same weight loss as duodenal switch for morbid obesity.

Clifford W Deveney1, David MacCabee, Katherine Marlink, Kenneth Welker, Justin Davis, Donald B McConnell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 2 weight loss procedures most commonly performed in the United States are Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) and lateral gastrectomy with duodenal switch (BPD/DS). RYGB is a restrictive procedure, whereas BPD/DS relies on mild restriction of intake as well as malabsorption. Many physicians believe that weight loss is greater after BPD/DS than after RYGBP. However, these procedures have not been compared using groups of patients operated on by the same surgeons at the same institution.
METHODS: We compared weight loss (expressed as percent of excess body weight [%EBW]) after 1 and 2 years in patients who underwent open RYGB or BPD/DS at our institution.
RESULTS: Average length of stay was longer in BPD/DS patients than in those undergoing RYGBP (8.7 vs. 5.9 days, P <0.05). Anastomotic leaks were higher after BPD/DS (6% vs. 3%), but the difference did not achieve statistical significance. Mortality did not differ between the 2 groups (0.8% vs. 0.9%). In the group of patients followed-up for 1 to 2 years, age and distribution of men and women did not differ. Those patients undergoing BPD/DS had higher body mass index (59 vs. 55, P <0.05). Weight loss expressed as %EBW was similar between the 2 groups: 54% versus 53% at 1 year and 67% versus 64% at 2 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggested that weight loss expressed as %EBW is similar between patients undergoing RYGBP and those undergoing BPD/DS. However, BPD/DS was associated with a longer hospital stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15135686     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  9 in total

1.  Alendronate improves vitamin D-resistant osteopenia triggered by gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer followed long term.

Authors:  Yutaka Suzuki; Yoshio Ishibashi; Nobuo Omura; Naruo Kawasaki; Hideyuki Kashiwagi; Katsuhiko Yanaga; Masahiro Abo; Mitsuyoshi Urashima
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Duodenal switch provides superior weight loss in the super-obese (BMI > or =50 kg/m2) compared with gastric bypass.

Authors:  Vivek N Prachand; Roy T Davee; John C Alverdy
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery: Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Steven H Belle; Paul D Berk; Anita P Courcoulas; David R Flum; Carolyn W Miles; James E Mitchell; Walter J Pories; Bruce M Wolfe; Susan Z Yanovski
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.734

4.  Early major complications after bariatric surgery in the USA, 2003-2014: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S-H Chang; N L B Freeman; J A Lee; C R T Stoll; A J Calhoun; J C Eagon; G A Colditz
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 9.213

5.  Obesity surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  S Sauerland; L Angrisani; M Belachew; J M Chevallier; F Favretti; N Finer; A Fingerhut; M Garcia Caballero; J A Guisado Macias; R Mittermair; M Morino; S Msika; F Rubino; R Tacchino; R Weiner; E A M Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Bariatric surgery: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2005-01-01

7.  Bowel habits after gastric bypass versus the duodenal switch operation.

Authors:  Nir Wasserberg; Nahid Hamoui; Patrizio Petrone; Peter F Crookes; Howard S Kaufman
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 8.  Biliopancreatic diversion: the effectiveness of duodenal switch and its limitations.

Authors:  Blaire Anderson; Richdeep S Gill; Christopher J de Gara; Shahzeer Karmali; Michel Gagner
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 9.  Surgery for obesity: a review of the current state of the art and future directions.

Authors:  Stephen S McNatt; James J Longhi; Charles D Goldman; David W McFadden
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.267

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.