Literature DB >> 17456286

Showing smokers with vascular disease images of their arteries to motivate cessation: a pilot study.

Lion Shahab1, Sue Hall, Theresa Marteau.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the potential impact of visual personalized biomarker feedback on intention to stop smoking and to evaluate possible underlying causal pathways.
DESIGN: This study is a pilot for a randomized controlled trial. Outcome measures were assessed immediately after the intervention and at 4 weeks follow-up.
METHOD: Twenty-three smokers attending a cardiovascular outpatient clinic in London were randomly allocated to one of two groups: to either receive a print-out of an ultrasound image of their carotid artery showing atherosclerotic plaque alongside an image of a disease-free artery, or to receive routine verbal feedback.
RESULTS: The intervention significantly increased perceptions of susceptibility to smoking-related diseases (Cohen's h=0.99) and led to increases both in engagement in smoking cessation behaviours (Cohen's h=0.79) and intentions to stop smoking (Cohn's d=0.44). The latter was moderated by self-efficacy: the intervention increased intention to stop smoking only in people with higher levels of self-efficacy with regard to stopping smoking.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides preliminary support for the potential effectiveness of personalized biomarker feedback to increase intentions to stop smoking. It also highlights the need to target and increase self-efficacy in smoking cessation interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17456286     DOI: 10.1348/135910706X109684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Health Psychol        ISSN: 1359-107X


  16 in total

1.  Health literacy: the need to consider images as well as words.

Authors:  Vikki Entwistle; Brian Williams
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 2.  Atherosclerosis screening by noninvasive imaging for cardiovascular prevention: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicolas Rodondi; Reto Auer; Vanessa de Bosset Sulzer; William A Ghali; Jacques Cornuz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  When does personalized feedback make a difference? A narrative review of recent findings and their implications for promoting better diabetes self-care.

Authors:  William H Polonsky; Lawrence Fisher
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.810

4.  Effects of an office-based carotid ultrasound screening intervention.

Authors:  Heather M Johnson; Terry L Turke; Mark Grossklaus; Tara Dall; Sanford Carimi; Laura M Koenig; Susan E Aeschlimann; Claudia E Korcarz; James H Stein
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 5.251

5.  Biomedical risk assessment as an aid for smoking cessation.

Authors:  Carole Clair; Yolanda Mueller; Jonathan Livingstone-Banks; Bernard Burnand; Jean-Yves Camain; Jacques Cornuz; Myriam Rège-Walther; Kevin Selby; Raphaël Bize
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-26

6.  Randomised controlled trial of the effects of physical activity feedback on awareness and behaviour in UK adults: the FAB study protocol [ISRCTN92551397].

Authors:  Clare Watkinson; Esther M F van Sluijs; Stephen Sutton; Theresa Marteau; Simon J Griffin
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Reconceptualizing efficacy in substance use prevention research: refusal response efficacy and drug resistance self-efficacy in adolescent substance use.

Authors:  Hye Jeong Choi; Janice L Krieger; Michael L Hecht
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2013

8.  Impact of a brief motivational smoking cessation intervention the Get PHIT randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jennifer B McClure; Evette J Ludman; Louis Grothaus; Chester Pabiniak; Julie Richards
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Effectiveness and uptake of screening programmes for coronary heart disease and diabetes: a realist review of design components used in interventions.

Authors:  Carol Holland; Yvonne Cooper; Rachel Shaw; Helen Pattison; Richard Cooke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Impact of personalised feedback about physical activity on change in objectively measured physical activity (the FAB study): a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Job G Godino; Clare Watkinson; Kirsten Corder; Theresa M Marteau; Stephen Sutton; Stephen J Sharp; Simon J Griffin; Esther M F van Sluijs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.