Literature DB >> 17455830

Contrast sensitivity after LASIK, LASEK, and wavefront-guided LASEK with the VISX S4 laser.

Tae Wan Kim1, Won Ryang Wee, Jin Hak Lee, Mee Kum Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the changes in contrast sensitivity and glare after corneal refractive surgery for moderate myopia.
METHODS: The study comprised 267 eyes of 149 patients who underwent LASIK, laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), or wavefront-guided LASEK with the VISX STAR S4. Contrast sensitivity was measured with VCTS 6500 before surgery and at 2 and 6 months postoperatively. Glare was evaluated using questionnaires and the ALC glare test at last follow-up. Contrast sensitivity at 2 and 6 months was compared with preoperative contrast sensitivity in each group. Glare sensitivity in each group was compared to normal controls.
RESULTS: Contrast sensitivity did not change after LASIK (P > .05). Contrast sensitivity of 3 and 6 cycles per degree (cpd) at 2 months increased after LASEK (P < .05) and contrast sensitivity of 6, 12, and 18 cpd at 2 months and 3, 6, 12, and 18 cpd at 6 months improved in wavefront-guided LASEK (P < .05). Glare test and questionnaires did not show any significant difference between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Wavefront-guided LASEK induced significant increases in contrast sensitivity of moderate myopes at high spatial frequencies under mesopic conditions by 6 months. Glare was not affected by the different refractive procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17455830     DOI: 10.3928/1081-597X-20070401-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  8 in total

1.  Visual performance after conventional LASIK and wavefront-guided LASIK with iris-registration: results at 1 year.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Yue-Hua Zhou; Rui Li; Lei Tian
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Effect of Iris registration on visual outcome in wavefront-guided LASEK for myopic astigmatism.

Authors:  Jong Joo Lee; Mee Kum Kim; Won Ryang Wee
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (Lasik) versus wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (Prk): a prospective randomized eye-to-eye comparison (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Edward E Manche; Weldon W Haw
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2011-12

4.  Single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in high myopia: qualitative and quantitative visual functions.

Authors:  Soheil Adib-Moghaddam; Saeed Soleyman-Jahi; Fatemeh Adili-Aghdam; Samuel Arba Mosquera; Niloofar Hoorshad; Salar Tofighi
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  A Prospective Comparison of Wavefront-Guided LASIK versus Wavefront-Guided PRK After Previous Keratorefractive Surgery.

Authors:  Michele D Lee; Lisa Y Chen; Elaine M Tran; Edward E Manche
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-20

Review 6.  Laser-Assisted Subepithelial Keratectomy versus Laser In Situ Keratomileusis in Myopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Li-Quan Zhao; Huang Zhu; Liang-Mao Li
Journal:  ISRN Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06-12

7.  Visual Performance after a Unilateral or Bilateral Implantation of Enlarged Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens in Patients with Cataract: A Prospective Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Se Hyun Choi; Hyo Kyung Lee; Chang Ho Yoon; Mee Kum Kim
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Comparison of two different contrast sensitivity devices in young adults with normal visual acuity with or without refractive surgery.

Authors:  Hyunjean Jung; Sung Uk Han; Sangyeop Kim; Hyunmin Ahn; Ikhyun Jun; Hyung Keun Lee; Kyoung Yul Seo; Tae-Im Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.996

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.