Literature DB >> 17454502

Characterization and mapping of very fine particles in an engine machining and assembly facility.

William A Heitbrink1, Douglas E Evans, Thomas M Peters, Thomas J Slavin.   

Abstract

Very fine particle number and mass concentrations were mapped in an engine machining and assembly facility in the winter and summer. A condensation particle counter (CPC) was used to measure particle number concentrations in the 0.01 microm to 1 microm range, and an optical particle counter (OPC) was used to measure particle number concentrations in 15 channels between 0.3 microm and 20 microm. The OPC measurements were used to estimate the respirable mass concentration. Very fine particle number concentrations were estimated by subtracting the OPC particle number concentrations from 0.3 microm to 1 microm from the CPC number concentrations. At specific locations during the summer visit, an electrical low pressure impactor was used to measure particle size distribution from 0.07 microm to 10 microm in 12 channels. The geometric mean ratio of respirable mass concentration estimated from the OPC to the gravimetrically measured mass concentration was 0.66 with a geometric standard deviation of 1.5. Very fine particle number concentrations in winter were substantially greater where direct-fire natural gas heaters were operated (7.5 x 10(5) particles/cm(3)) than where steam was used for heat (3 x 10(5) particles/cm(3)). During summer when heaters were off, the very fine particle number concentrations were below 10(5) particles/cm(3), regardless of location. Elevated very fine particle number concentrations were associated with machining operations with poor enclosures. Whereas respirable mass concentrations did not vary noticeably with season, they were greater in areas with poorly fitting enclosures (0.12 mg/m(3)) than in areas where state-of-the-art enclosures were used (0.03 mg/m(3)). These differences were attributed to metalworking fluid mist that escaped from poorly fitting enclosures. Particles generated from direct-fire natural gas heater operation were very small, with a number size distribution modal diameter of less than 0.023 microm. Aerosols generated by machining operations had number size distributions modes in the 0.023 microm to 0.1 microm range. However, multiple modes in the mass size distributions estimated from OPC measurements occurred in the 2-20 microm range. Although elevated, very fine particle concentrations and respirable mass concentrations were both associated with poorly enclosed machining operations; the operation of the direct-fire natural gas heaters resulted in the greatest very fine particle concentrations without elevating the respirable mass concentration. These results suggest that respirable mass concentration may not be an adequate indicator for very fine particle exposure.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17454502     DOI: 10.1080/15459620701290081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  9 in total

1.  Mapping Occupational Hazards with a Multi-sensor Network in a Heavy-Vehicle Manufacturing Facility.

Authors:  Christopher Zuidema; Sinan Sousan; Larissa V Stebounova; Alyson Gray; Xiaoxing Liu; Marcus Tatum; Oliver Stroh; Geb Thomas; Thomas Peters; Kirsten Koehler
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 2.179

2.  Optimizing a Sensor Network with Data from Hazard Mapping Demonstrated in a Heavy-Vehicle Manufacturing Facility.

Authors:  Jesse D Berman; Thomas M Peters; Kirsten A Koehler
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 2.179

3.  Aerosol monitoring during carbon nanofiber production: mobile direct-reading sampling.

Authors:  Douglas E Evans; Bon Ki Ku; M Eileen Birch; Kevin H Dunn
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2010-05-06

4.  Comparison of the DiSCmini aerosol monitor to a handheld condensation particle counter and a scanning mobility particle sizer for submicrometer sodium chloride and metal aerosols.

Authors:  Jessica B Mills; Jae Hong Park; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Occupational exposure assessment in carbon nanotube and nanofiber primary and secondary manufacturers: mobile direct-reading sampling.

Authors:  Matthew M Dahm; Douglas E Evans; Mary K Schubauer-Berigan; M Eileen Birch; James A Deddens
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2012-10-25

6.  Composition of Metallic Elements and Size Distribution of Fine and Ultrafine Particles in a Steelmaking Factory.

Authors:  Gabriele Marcias; Jacopo Fostinelli; Simona Catalani; Michele Uras; Andrea Maurizio Sanna; Giuseppe Avataneo; Giuseppe De Palma; Daniele Fabbri; Matteo Paganelli; Luigi Isaia Lecca; Giorgio Buonanno; Marcello Campagna
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Estimating personal exposures from a multi-hazard sensor network.

Authors:  Christopher Zuidema; Larissa V Stebounova; Sinan Sousan; Alyson Gray; Oliver Stroh; Geb Thomas; Thomas Peters; Kirsten Koehler
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 8.  Developing korean standard for nanomaterial exposure assessment.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Lee; Jun Yeob Lee; Il Je Yu
Journal:  Toxicol Res       Date:  2011-06

9.  Early Effect Markers and Exposure Determinants of Metalworking Fluids Among Metal Industry Workers: Protocol for a Field Study.

Authors:  Nancy B Hopf; Eve Bourgkard; Valérie Demange; Sébastien Hulo; Jean-Jacques Sauvain; Ronan Levilly; Fanny Jeandel; Alain Robert; Yves Guichard; Jacques André Pralong; Nathalie Chérot-Kornobis; Jean-Louis Edmé; Pascal Wild
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2019-08-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.