Literature DB >> 174537

[Problems of the electric response audiometry (ERA) during the natural and artificial sleep (author's transl)].

B Freigang, Z S Kevanishvili.   

Abstract

The investigators carried out threshold determinations on 16 children and 6 adults in wakefulness, under general anaesthesia (we used chloral hydrate anaesthesia) and in sleep (stage II-III and stage REM). Falling asleep (stage I and initial stage of anaesthesia respectively) the latencies of the individual components of the acoustically evoked potentials are prolonged in mean of 30 msec. Simultaneously the amplitude of N1 significantly decreases and N2 becomes a prominent point (Fig. 1). The generation mechanisms of wave N2 are obviously different from those of wave N1. Its input-output curve takes a very steep course (Fig. 5) and the shortening of latencies increases with growing intensity of stimulus too (Fig. 4). Amplitude histogrammes demonstrated the dependency of the form of the acoustically evoked potential on the degree of synchronisation of EEG activity. While in the case of desynchronisation N1 appears more markedly, N2 does in the case of synchronisation. The mean deviation of the ERA threshold totals plus 3.8 +/- 6.9 dB (n = 41) under chloral hydrate anaesthesia, plus 4.9 +/- 6.7 dB (n = 37) in natural sleep in contrast to the wakefulness. With a 99% confidence there occur confidence intervals ranging from + 1 to + 7 dB and from +2 to +8 dB respectively. In identifying the threshold potentials error I (existing potential not recognized) occurred in 15-20%, error II (random wave seen as potential) in 20% of these studies. All these experiments showed significant lower variances for the latencies compared with variancies of amplitudes. The variance of amplitudes is smallest in children (Table 1) under general anaesthesia as well as in adults in wakefulness (Table 2). For the practical performance of ERA chloral hydrate is recommended for studies on children. A uniform EEG-state as well as a uniform depth of sleep are basic conditions for ERA during sleep, sedation or under anaesthesia. These conditions must constantly be controlled by EEG, EOG and EMG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 174537     DOI: 10.1007/bf01221116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0302-9530


  16 in total

1.  Proposed supplements and amendments to 'A Manual of Standardized Terminology, Techniques and Scoring System for Sleep Stages of Human Subjects', the Rechtschaffen & Kales (1968) standard.

Authors:  T Hori; Y Sugita; E Koga; S Shirakawa; K Inoue; S Uchida; H Kuwahara; M Kousaka; T Kobayashi; Y Tsuji; M Terashima; K Fukuda; N Fukuda
Journal:  Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.188

2.  AUDITORY EVOKED RESPONSES DURING DIFFERENT STAGES OF SLEEP IN MAN.

Authors:  E D WEITZMAN; H KREMEN
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1965-01

3.  Evoked responses to clicks and electroencephalographic stages of sleep in man.

Authors:  H L WILLIAMS; D I TEPAS; H C MORLOCK
Journal:  Science       Date:  1962-11-09       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Auditory input to the human cortex during states of drowsiness and surgical anesthesia.

Authors:  G G Celesia; F Puletti
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1971-12

5.  The role of sedation in ERA from the vertex.

Authors:  G Salomon; O Beck; C Elberling
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1973 May-Jun

6.  On the origin of the auditory averaged evoked responses recorded from the scalp in the anesthetized cat.

Authors:  Z S Kevanishvili; O A Kajaia
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1973 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 1.494

7.  Effect of sedation upon evoked response audiometry: amplitude and latency vs sound pressure level.

Authors:  T Karnahl; C D Benning
Journal:  Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd       Date:  1972

8.  Evoked response (EEG) audiometry in nonorganic hearing loss.

Authors:  G A McCandless; W E Lentz
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1968-02

9.  Small computers in evoked response audiometry (ERA).

Authors:  M Spreng
Journal:  Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd       Date:  1971

10.  Discrepancies between subjective and objective acoustic thresholds.

Authors:  K Burian; G F Gestring
Journal:  Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd       Date:  1971
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  [Georgia, a country of diverse aid from Germany in the ENT field].

Authors:  T Eichhorn; J Kanzok; J Langer; J Maurer; G Mlynski; R Mlynski; T Zahnert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Intramodal and interaural interactions of the human slow auditory evoked potential.

Authors:  Z S Kevanishvili; C Pantev; O A Khachidze
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1979

3.  Does promethazine (Atosil) influence the human's early acoustically evoked potentials in the same way as the late potential N1?

Authors:  C Zöllner; T Karnahl; G Stange
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1977-05-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.