Literature DB >> 577694

Does promethazine (Atosil) influence the human's early acoustically evoked potentials in the same way as the late potential N1?

C Zöllner, T Karnahl, G Stange.   

Abstract

In a former investigation the effect of promethazine (Atosil) on the late acoustically evoked potential component N1 was examined. Now the cochlear and the brain-stem potentials were registered by the earlobe-vertex pick-up with i.m. application of 0.8 mg/kg (body weight) promethazine. There was no influence of promethazine either on the compound action potential (NAP) or on the brain-stem potentials (Pot. II-V), but sedation improves significantly the signal-to-noise ratio, therefore we sedate all patients when registering the five early acoustically evoked potentials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 577694     DOI: 10.1007/bf00463061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0302-9530


  18 in total

1.  AUDITORY EVOKED RESPONSES DURING DIFFERENT STAGES OF SLEEP IN MAN.

Authors:  E D WEITZMAN; H KREMEN
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1965-01

2.  Sedation of young children for electric response audiometry (ERA). Summary of a symposium.

Authors:  H Davis
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1973-01

3.  Human auditory evoked potentials. II. Effects of attention.

Authors:  T W Picton; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1974-02

4.  Evoked response audiometry under sedation.

Authors:  K Burian; G F Gestring; S Hruby
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1970-02

5.  Human vigilance and auditory evoked responses.

Authors:  H Fruhstorfer; R M Bergström
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1969-10

6.  Properties of an early AER of 5 - 10 ms latency.

Authors:  G Gerull; M Giesen; D Mrowinski
Journal:  Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord)       Date:  1974 Jul-Aug

7.  Standard values of amplitude and latency of cochlear audiometry (electro-cochleography). Responses in different age groups.

Authors:  A Lieberman; H Sohmer; G Szabo
Journal:  Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd       Date:  1973-02-28

8.  Effect of sedation upon evoked response audiometry: amplitude and latency vs sound pressure level.

Authors:  T Karnahl; C D Benning
Journal:  Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd       Date:  1972

9.  The effect of sedative agents in psychotropic drugs on acoustically evoked responses.

Authors:  G Stange
Journal:  Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd       Date:  1972

10.  Cerebral evoked response to auditory stimuli in young children during sleep.

Authors:  T Suzuki; K Taguchi
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1968-02       Impact factor: 1.547

View more
  3 in total

1.  ["On-line artefact rejection" at electric response audiometry (ERA). Use of an active, analog delay line as buffer in combination with a recognition of disturbing signals (author's transl)].

Authors:  P Pedersen; T Karnahl; C Zöllner
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1977-12-20

2.  The dependence of early acoustically evoked potentials on age.

Authors:  H S Johannsen; T Lehn
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1984

3.  [ERA-findings by "cortical hearing disorder" (author's transl)].

Authors:  C Zöllner; T Karnahl; P Pedersen
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1977-10-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.