BACKGROUND: This study examined the relative contribution of genetic and environmental effects on the air-conducted hearing threshold level (0.5-4 kHz) and speech recognition threshold level of the better ear as well as self-reported hearing in older women. METHODS: Hearing was measured as a part of the Finnish Twin Study on Aging in 103 monozygotic (MZ) and 114 dizygotic (DZ) female twin pairs aged 63-76 years. Audiometric measured hearing was tested using standardized methods in soundproof conditions. Self-reported hearing was assessed by a structured question. Quantitative genetic modeling was used for data analyses. RESULTS: No significant differences in age, exposure to noise, hearing-aid use, auditory diseases or accidents, or number of self-reported chronic conditions or prescription medicines were observed between the MZ and DZ twins. A genetic component in common accounted for 75% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67%-81%) of the variance in the better ear's hearing threshold level and 54% (95% CI, 43%-64%) in the better ear's speech recognition threshold level, according to a bivariate genetic analysis. In addition, 10% (95% CI, 4%-15%) of the variance in the better ear's speech recognition threshold level was explained by its specific genetic component. CONCLUSION: Individual differences in audiometrically measured air-conducted hearing threshold level (0.5-4 kHz) and speech recognition threshold level in the better ear were largely accounted for by genetic differences between individuals. In contrast, self-reported hearing appears to be accounted for solely by environmental factors.
BACKGROUND: This study examined the relative contribution of genetic and environmental effects on the air-conducted hearing threshold level (0.5-4 kHz) and speech recognition threshold level of the better ear as well as self-reported hearing in older women. METHODS: Hearing was measured as a part of the Finnish Twin Study on Aging in 103 monozygotic (MZ) and 114 dizygotic (DZ) female twin pairs aged 63-76 years. Audiometric measured hearing was tested using standardized methods in soundproof conditions. Self-reported hearing was assessed by a structured question. Quantitative genetic modeling was used for data analyses. RESULTS: No significant differences in age, exposure to noise, hearing-aid use, auditory diseases or accidents, or number of self-reported chronic conditions or prescription medicines were observed between the MZ and DZ twins. A genetic component in common accounted for 75% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67%-81%) of the variance in the better ear's hearing threshold level and 54% (95% CI, 43%-64%) in the better ear's speech recognition threshold level, according to a bivariate genetic analysis. In addition, 10% (95% CI, 4%-15%) of the variance in the better ear's speech recognition threshold level was explained by its specific genetic component. CONCLUSION: Individual differences in audiometrically measured air-conducted hearing threshold level (0.5-4 kHz) and speech recognition threshold level in the better ear were largely accounted for by genetic differences between individuals. In contrast, self-reported hearing appears to be accounted for solely by environmental factors.
Authors: Anne Viljanen; Jaakko Kaprio; Ilmari Pyykkö; Martti Sorri; Satu Pajala; Markku Kauppinen; Markku Koskenvuo; Taina Rantanen Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2009-01-31 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Jeroen R Huyghe; Lut Van Laer; Jan-Jaap Hendrickx; Erik Fransen; Kelly Demeester; Vedat Topsakal; Sylvia Kunst; Minna Manninen; Mona Jensen; Amanda Bonaconsa; Manuela Mazzoli; Manuela Baur; Samuli Hannula; Elina Mäki-Torkko; Angeles Espeso; Els Van Eyken; Antonia Flaquer; Christian Becker; Dafydd Stephens; Martti Sorri; Eva Orzan; Michael Bille; Agnete Parving; Ilmari Pyykkö; Cor W R J Cremers; Hannie Kremer; Paul H Van de Heyning; Thomas F Wienker; Peter Nürnberg; Markus Pfister; Guy Van Camp Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2008-08-28 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Laura A Raynor; James S Pankow; Michael B Miller; Guan-Hua Huang; Dayna Dalton; Ronald Klein; Barbara E K Klein; Karen J Cruickshanks Journal: Am J Audiol Date: 2009-05-27 Impact factor: 1.493
Authors: Dragana Vuckovic; Sally Dawson; Deborah I Scheffer; Taina Rantanen; Anna Morgan; Mariateresa Di Stazio; Diego Vozzi; Teresa Nutile; Maria P Concas; Ginevra Biino; Lisa Nolan; Aileen Bahl; Anu Loukola; Anne Viljanen; Adrian Davis; Marina Ciullo; David P Corey; Mario Pirastu; Paolo Gasparini; Giorgia Girotto Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2015-07-17 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Lisa E Wolber; Giorgia Girotto; Annalisa Buniello; Dragana Vuckovic; Nicola Pirastu; Beatriz Lorente-Cánovas; Igor Rudan; Caroline Hayward; Ozren Polasek; Marina Ciullo; Massimo Mangino; Claire Steves; Maria Pina Concas; Massilimiliano Cocca; Tim D Spector; Paolo Gasparini; Karen P Steel; Frances M K Williams Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2014-07-24 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Henning Frenzel; Jörg Bohlender; Katrin Pinsker; Bärbel Wohlleben; Jens Tank; Stefan G Lechner; Daniela Schiska; Teresa Jaijo; Franz Rüschendorf; Kathrin Saar; Jens Jordan; José M Millán; Manfred Gross; Gary R Lewin Journal: PLoS Biol Date: 2012-05-01 Impact factor: 8.029