Literature DB >> 17451211

Preventive effect of gelatinizedly-modified chitosan film on peritoneal adhesion of different types.

Xie-Lai Zhou1, Shan-Wen Chen, Guo-Dong Liao, Zhou-Jun Shen, Zhi-Liang Zhang, Li Sun, Yi-Jun Yu, Qiao-Ling Hu, Xiao-Dong Jin.   

Abstract

AIM: To comparatively study the preventive effect of gelatinizedly-modified chitosan film on peritoneal adhesions induced by four different factors in rats.
METHODS: Chitosan was chemically modified by gelatinization, and made into films of 60 microm in thickness, and sterilized. Two hundred Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into five groups, Sham-operation group (group A), wound-induced adhesion group (group B), purified talc-induced adhesion group (group C), vascular ligation-induced adhesion group (group D), and infection-induced adhesion group (group E), respectively. In each group, the rats were treated with different adhesion-inducing methods at the cecum of vermiform processes and then were divided into control and experimental subgroups. Serous membrane surface of vermiform processes were covered with the films in the experimental subgroups, and no films were used in the control subgroups. After 2 and 4 wk of treatments, the abdominal cavities were reopened and the adhesive severity was graded blindly according to Bhatia's method. The cecum of vermiform processes were resected for hydroxyproline (OHP) measurement and pathological examination.
RESULTS: Adhesion severity and OHP level: After 2 and 4 wk of the treatments, in the experimental subgroups, the adhesions were significantly lighter and the OHP levels were significantly lower than those of the control subgroups in group B (2 wk: 0.199 +/- 0.026 vs 0.285 +/- 0.041 microg/mg pr, P < 0.001; 4 wk: 0.183 +/- 0.034 vs 0.276 +/- 0.03 microg/mg pr, P < 0.001), D (2 wk: 0.216 +/- 0.036 vs 0.274 +/- 0.040 microg/mg pr, P = 0.004; 4 wk: 0.211 +/- 0.044 vs 0.281 +/- 0.047 microg/mg pr, P = 0.003) and E (2 wk: 0.259 +/- 0.039 vs 0.371 +/- 0.040 microg/mg pr, P < 0.001; 4 wk: 0.242 +/- 0.045 vs 0.355 +/- 0.029 microg/mg pr, P < 0.001), but there were no significant differences in groups A (2 wk: 0.141 +/- 0.028 vs 0.137 +/- 0.026 microg/mg pr, P = 0.737; 4 wk: 0.132 +/- 0.031 vs 0.150 +/- 0.035 microg/mg pr, P = 0.225) and C (2 wk: 0.395 +/- 0.044 vs 0.378 +/- 0.043 microg/mg pr, P = 0.387; 4 wk: 0.370 +/- 0.032 vs 0.367 +/- 0.041 microg/mg pr, P = 0.853); Pathological changes: In group B, the main pathological changes were fibroplasias in the treated serous membrane surface and in group D, the fibroplasia was shown in the whole layer of the vermiform processes. In group E, the main pathological changes were acute and chronic suppurative inflammatory reactions. These changes were lighter in the experimental subgroups than those in the control subgroups in the three groups. In group C, the main changes were foreign body giant cell and granuloma reactions and fibroplasias in different degrees, with no apparent differences between the experimental and control subgroups.
CONCLUSION: The gelatinizedly-modified chitosan film is effective on preventing peritoneal adhesions induced by wound, ischemia and infection, but the effect is not apparent in foreign body-induced adhesion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17451211      PMCID: PMC4147005          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i8.1262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  13 in total

1.  [Clinical study on chitosan in prevention of knee adhesion after patellar operation].

Authors:  Rui-sheng Xu; Chun-lin Hou; Cheng-hui Yin; Yong-sheng Wang; Ai-min Chen
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2002-07

2.  Growth modulation of fibroblasts by chitosan-polyvinyl pyrrolidone hydrogel: implications for wound management?

Authors:  M Risbud; A Hardikar; R Bhonde
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Use of chitosan as a biomaterial: studies on its safety and hemostatic potential.

Authors:  S B Rao; C P Sharma
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1997-01

4.  The prevention of experimentally induced postoperative adhesions.

Authors:  D S Bhatia; J E Allen
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 5.  Peritoneal adhesions: pathogenesis, assessment and effects.

Authors:  M P Senthilkumar; Jacob S Dreyer
Journal:  Trop Gastroenterol       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar

6.  Prevention of pericardial adhesions with N-O carboxymethylchitosan in the rabbit model.

Authors:  T J Krause; G Zazanis; P Malatesta; A Solina
Journal:  J Invest Surg       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 7.  Peritoneal adhesions: etiology, pathophysiology, and clinical significance. Recent advances in prevention and management.

Authors:  T Liakakos; N Thomakos; P M Fine; C Dervenis; R L Young
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.588

8.  An experimental study of the effect of aprotinin on intestinal adhesion formation.

Authors:  Y Ozoğul; A Baykal; D Onat; N Renda; I Sayek
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Reduction in postoperative adhesion formation and re-formation after an abdominal operation with the use of N, O - carboxymethyl chitosan.

Authors:  Juan Zhou; Clive Elson; Timothy D G Lee
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 10.  Application of chitin and chitosan derivatives in the pharmaceutical field.

Authors:  Yoshinori Kato; Hiraku Onishi; Yoshiharu Machida
Journal:  Curr Pharm Biotechnol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.837

View more
  3 in total

1.  The effect of a chitosan coating on the adhesive potential and tensile strength of polypropylene meshes.

Authors:  Y Altınel; E Öztürk; G Özkaya; E Ü Akyıldız; Y Ulcay; H Özgüç
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Comparison of the effects of Mitomycin-C and sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose [NH/CMC] (Seprafilm) on abdominal adhesions.

Authors:  Ismail Hakkı Ozerhan; Murat Urkan; Ulvi Mehmet Meral; Aytekin Unlu; Nail Ersöz; Funda Demirag; Gokhan Yagci
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-06-23

Review 3.  Chitosan and Its Potential Use as a Scaffold for Tissue Engineering in Regenerative Medicine.

Authors:  Martin Rodríguez-Vázquez; Brenda Vega-Ruiz; Rodrigo Ramos-Zúñiga; Daniel Alexander Saldaña-Koppel; Luis Fernando Quiñones-Olvera
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 3.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.