Literature DB >> 17449876

First experience with a new active fixation coronary sinus lead.

H Nägele1, M Azizi, S Hashagen, M A Castel, S Behrens.   

Abstract

AIMS: Coronary sinus (CS) lead implantation is a technically challenging procedure owing to variable vein anatomies and a high dislocation rate. Therefore, CS lead technology has undergone evolutionary changes during the last 10 years. The mode of fixation has been a passive one up to now. We want to describe our first clinical experience with the newly available active fixation lead 4195 in terms of dislocation rate and stability of thresholds compared with conventional models. METHODS AND
RESULTS: From 1999 to February 2007, we implanted 403 CS leads in 368 patients. Leads were categorized into three different groups on the basis of their fixation mechanism: straight (Easytrak I and Situs OTW; n = 54), curved (Attain 4193 and 4194, Corox, Aescula, Situs ULD; n = 308), and active (Attain 4195; n = 41). Operative and follow-up data were prospectively noted and checked for significance between groups during the first 3 months after implantation. Kaplan-Meier analysis of long-term lead function was also performed. Straight and curved CS leads suffered from significantly more dislocations compared with active fixation (P < 0.001). The active fixation lead (4195) has a stable threshold over time compared with a significant rise after 24 h and thereafter in straight (62%) and curved leads (20%). However, retraction of an active fixation CS lead may be a difficult issue as outlined in two cases requiring pullback of a 4195 lead owing to phrenic nerve stimulation (one unsuccessful despite vigorous traction).
CONCLUSION: The active fixation lead 4195 using retention lobes yielded stable thresholds over time and seems to be superior to conventional leads in terms of dislocation. However, extraction may be a difficult or even impossible task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17449876     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eum061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  9 in total

1.  Different venous angioplasty manoeuvres for successful implantation of CRT devices.

Authors:  Guido Luedorff; Rainer Grove; Wolfgang Kranig; J Thale
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Outcomes and predictors of difficulty with coronary sinus lead removal.

Authors:  Seth Sheldon; Paul A Friedman; David L Hayes; Michael J Osborn; Yong-Mei Cha; Robert F Rea; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  [Technical innovations and limitation in cardiac electrotherapy].

Authors:  H-H Minden
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2011-03

4.  Starfix lead extraction: Clinical experience and technical issues.

Authors:  Pier Giorgio Golzio; Ilaria Meynet; Fulvio Orzan; Elisa Pellissero; Davide Castagno; Federico Ferraris; Fiorenzo Gaita
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2015-11-14

5.  Initial Japanese experience and long-term follow-up with a new active fixation coronary sinus lead, the StarFix 4195.

Authors:  Takayuki Nagai; Hideki Okayama; Kazuhisa Nishimura; Katsuji Inoue; Jun Suzuki; Akiyoshi Ogimoto; Tomoaki Ohtsuka; Go Hiasa; Takumi Sumimoto; Funada Jun-Ichi; Jitsuo Higaki
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2010-01-27

Review 6.  Active fixation mechanism complicates coronary sinus lead extraction and limits subsequent reimplantation targets.

Authors:  E M Cronin; C P Ingelmo; J Rickard; O M Wazni; D O Martin; B L Wilkoff; B Baranowski
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  What can happen during coronary sinus lead implantation: dislocation, perforation and other catastrophes.

Authors:  H Nägele; S Behrens; M Azizi
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2007-12

8.  Editorial: What makes transvenous extraction more difficult?

Authors:  Hideo Okamura
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2015-12-04

9.  Coronary Sinus Lead Removal: A Comparison between Active and Passive Fixation Leads.

Authors:  Simon Pecha; Charles Kennergren; Yalin Yildirim; Nils Gosau; Ali Aydin; Stephan Willems; Hendrik Treede; Hermann Reichenspurner; Samer Hakmi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.