BACKGROUND: Previous clinical studies have observed relationships between increased intima-media thickness (IMT) in the carotid artery, elevated blood pressure, and low wall shear stress (WSS) calculated from the Poiseuille equation. This study used numerical methods to more accurately determine WSS in the carotid artery and to investigate possible determinants of increased IMT. METHODS: IMT [common carotid artery (CCA) and bulb], CCA flow velocity, brachial systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and carotid systolic pressure (cSBP) were measured in 14 healthy subjects (aged 44 +/- 16 yr). Flow patterns in the carotid bifurcation were determined by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) based on three-dimensional ultrasound geometry. Instantaneous and time-averaged wall shear stress (WSS(av)), oscillatory shear index (OSI), and wall shear stress angle gradients (WSSAG) were calculated. RESULTS: IMT was positively related to SBP, DBP, cSBP, and WSSAG and inversely related to WSS(av) in the CCA. In the bulb, IMT was positively related to SBP and cSBP but was not significantly related to WSS(av) or WSSAG. IMT was unrelated to OSI in both the CCA and the bulb. CONCLUSION: Increased carotid artery IMT in healthy subjects with no evidence of focal plaques is primarily a response to elevated pressure.
BACKGROUND: Previous clinical studies have observed relationships between increased intima-media thickness (IMT) in the carotid artery, elevated blood pressure, and low wall shear stress (WSS) calculated from the Poiseuille equation. This study used numerical methods to more accurately determine WSS in the carotid artery and to investigate possible determinants of increased IMT. METHODS: IMT [common carotid artery (CCA) and bulb], CCA flow velocity, brachial systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and carotid systolic pressure (cSBP) were measured in 14 healthy subjects (aged 44 +/- 16 yr). Flow patterns in the carotid bifurcation were determined by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) based on three-dimensional ultrasound geometry. Instantaneous and time-averaged wall shear stress (WSS(av)), oscillatory shear index (OSI), and wall shear stress angle gradients (WSSAG) were calculated. RESULTS: IMT was positively related to SBP, DBP, cSBP, and WSSAG and inversely related to WSS(av) in the CCA. In the bulb, IMT was positively related to SBP and cSBP but was not significantly related to WSS(av) or WSSAG. IMT was unrelated to OSI in both the CCA and the bulb. CONCLUSION: Increased carotid artery IMT in healthy subjects with no evidence of focal plaques is primarily a response to elevated pressure.
Authors: Joseph F Polak; Michael J Pencina; Allison Meisner; Karol M Pencina; Lisa S Brown; Philip A Wolf; Ralph B D'Agostino Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: John F LaDisa; Mark Bowers; Leanne Harmann; Robert Prost; Anil Vamsi Doppalapudi; Tayyab Mohyuddin; Osama Zaidat; Raymond Q Migrino Journal: Med Phys Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Mahmut Ilker Yilmaz; Alper Sonmez; Alberto Ortiz; Mutlu Saglam; Selim Kilic; Tayfun Eyileten; Kayser Caglar; Yusuf Oguz; Abdulgaffar Vural; Mustafa Çakar; Jesus Egido; Battal Altun; Mujdat Yenicesu; Luis Miguel Blanco-Colio; Juan Jesús Carrero Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2011-02-17 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Florentino Luciano Caetano Dos Santos; Atte Joutsen; Michelangelo Paci; Juha Salenius; Hannu Eskola Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-05-03 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Yong He; Chessy M Fernandez; Zhihua Jiang; Ming Tao; Kerri A O'Malley; Scott A Berceli Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2013-12-15 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Joseph F Polak; Sharina D Person; Gina S Wei; Ayleen Godreau; David R Jacobs; Anita Harrington; Stephen Sidney; Daniel H O'Leary Journal: Stroke Date: 2009-11-12 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Ryo Torii; Nigel B Wood; Nearchos Hadjiloizou; Andrew W Dowsey; Andrew R Wright; Alun D Hughes; Justin Davies; Darrel P Francis; Jamil Mayet; Guang-Zhong Yang; Simon A McG Thom; X Yun Xu Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2009-01-16 Impact factor: 4.733