Literature DB >> 17446823

Health-related quality of life consequences of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: results from MADIT II.

Katia Noyes1, Ethan Corona, Jack Zwanziger, W Jackson Hall, Hongwei Zhao, Hongkun Wang, Arthur J Moss, Andrew W Dick.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) improve survival and extend lives of patients with severe heart disease.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the impact of ICDs on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) during the first 3 years after implantation.
SUBJECTS: A total of 1089 patients from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II (MADIT II) were randomized to an ICD or medical treatment only. MEASURES: Health Utility Index (HUI3) at baseline, 3, 12, 24, and 36 months following randomization; survival data. RESEARCH
DESIGN: We constructed mean profiles of HRQOL for living patients, estimated overall quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), separately by treatment arm, and calculated cumulative QALY gains/losses as the difference between the areas under the treatment specific HRQOL profiles. Multivariate fixed effect regression models were developed to impute the missing HRQOL data using baseline patient characteristics (age, gender, treatment, HUI3 score, diabetes, diuretics use, and NYHA class). Bootstrapped standard errors were calculated for the estimated differences in HRQOL gains/losses between treatment arms. Similarly, we performed subgroup analyses (by gender, age, and baseline NYHA class, blood urine nitrogen, ejection fraction, and QRS).
RESULTS: There were no differences in QALYs loss for living patients by treatment group (-0.037, P = 0.64) or in overall QALYs loss by treatment group (0.043, P = 0.37) over 3 years. In subgroup analysis, female subjects demonstrated a trend towards greater survival benefit (0.298, P = 0.07) and overall QALYs (0.261, P = 0.14).
CONCLUSIONS: Adverse effects of the ICD on HRQOL together with lower HRQOL among survivors may offset the 3-year survival benefits of ICDs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17446823     DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000257142.12600.c1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  10 in total

Review 1.  Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Use in Older Adults: Proceedings of a Hartford Change AGEnts Symposium.

Authors:  Daniel B Kramer; Daniel D Matlock; Alfred E Buxton; Nathan E Goldstein; Carol Goodwin; Ariel R Green; James N Kirkpatrick; Christopher Knoepke; Rachel Lampert; Paul S Mueller; Matthew R Reynolds; John A Spertus; Lynne W Stevenson; Susan L Mitchell
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2015-06-02

2.  A feasibility study of arrhythmia risk prediction in patients with myocardial infarction and preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Dongdong Deng; Hermenegild J Arevalo; Adityo Prakosa; David J Callans; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.214

3.  Patient preference in the decision to place implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Authors:  Tanner J Caverly; Sana M Al-Khatib; Jean S Kutner; Frederick A Masoudi; Daniel D Matlock
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-23

4.  Cost-effectiveness of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in children with dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Brian Feingold; Gaurav Arora; Steven A Webber; Kenneth J Smith
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 5.712

Review 5.  Economic evaluations of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lidia García-Pérez; Pilar Pinilla-Domínguez; Antonio García-Quintana; Eduardo Caballero-Dorta; F Javier García-García; Renata Linertová; Iñaki Imaz-Iglesia
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-10-17

6.  Shared decision-making for ICDs: a regional collaborative initiative.

Authors:  Honey Thomas; Mark Lambert; Chris Plummer; Craig Runnett; Richard Thomson; Anne Marie Troy-Smith; Andrew J Turley
Journal:  Br J Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-28

7.  Examination of the effect of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators on health-related quality of life: based on results from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Trial-II.

Authors:  Katia Noyes; Ethan Corona; Peter Veazie; Andrew W Dick; Hongwei Zhao; Arthur J Moss
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.571

8.  A prospective longitudinal study of health-related quality of life and psychological wellbeing after an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with genetic heart diseases.

Authors:  Lieke M van den Heuvel; Tanya Sarina; Joanna Sweeting; Laura Yeates; Kezia Bates; Catherine Spinks; Catherine O'Donnell; Samuel F Sears; Kevin McGeechan; Christopher Semsarian; Jodie Ingles
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2022-02-08

9.  Comparative Study between Subcutaneous and Endovascular Defibrillator Recipients Regarding Tolerance to the Implant Procedure and Perception of Quality of Life.

Authors:  Pablo Esteban Auquilla-Clavijo; Naiara Calvo-Galiano; Marina Povar-Echeverría; Teresa Oloriz-Sanjuan; Francisco Diaz-Cortejana; Antonio Asso-Abadia
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 10.  Quality of Life in Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Juliane Tomzik; Katharina C Koltermann; Markus Zabel; Stefan N Willich; Thomas Reinhold
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-11-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.