Literature DB >> 17446043

A neural model of decision-making by the superior colicullus in an antisaccade task.

Vassilis Cutsuridis1, Nikolaos Smyrnis, Ioannis Evdokimidis, Stavros Perantonis.   

Abstract

In the antisaccade paradigm subjects are instructed to perform eye movements in the opposite direction from the location of a visually appearing stimulus while they are fixating on a central stimulus. A recent study investigated saccade reaction times (SRTs) and percentages of erroneous prosaccades (towards the peripheral stimulus) of 2006 young men performing visually guided antisaccades. A unimodal distribution of SRTs (ranging from 80 to 600 ms) as well as an overall 25% of erroneous prosaccade responses was reported in that large sample. In this article, we present a neural model of saccade initiation based on competitive integration of planned and reactive saccade decision signals in the intermediate layer of the superior colliculus. In the model the decision processes grow nonlinearly towards a preset criterion level and when they cross it, a movement is initiated. The resultant model reproduced the unimodal distributions of SRTs for correct antisaccades and erroneous prosaccades as well as the variability of SRTs and the percentage of erroneous prosaccade responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17446043     DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2007.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Netw        ISSN: 0893-6080


  21 in total

1.  Dual-task costs and benefits in anti-saccade performance.

Authors:  David R Evens; Casimir J H Ludwig
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Anxiety, a benefit and detriment to cognition: behavioral and magnetoencephalographic evidence from a mixed-saccade task.

Authors:  Brian R Cornwell; Sven C Mueller; Raphael Kaplan; Christian Grillon; Monique Ernst
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: A microanalytic-macroanalytic investigation of individual differences in goal activation and maintenance.

Authors:  Matt E Meier; Bridget A Smeekens; Paul J Silvia; Thomas R Kwapil; Michael J Kane
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Collicular circuits for flexible sensorimotor routing.

Authors:  Chunyu A Duan; Marino Pagan; Alex T Piet; Charles D Kopec; Athena Akrami; Alexander J Riordan; Jeffrey C Erlich; Carlos D Brody
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Trial-type probability and task-switching effects on behavioral response characteristics in a mixed saccade task.

Authors:  Jordan E Pierce; J Brett McCardel; Jennifer E McDowell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Behavioural and computational varieties of response inhibition in eye movements.

Authors:  Vassilis Cutsuridis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Towards a unifying mechanism for cancelling movements.

Authors:  Imran Noorani
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 8.  Mechanisms of saccade suppression revealed in the anti-saccade task.

Authors:  Brian C Coe; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Cognitive control and automatic interference in mind and brain: A unified model of saccadic inhibition and countermanding.

Authors:  Aline Bompas; Anne Eileen Campbell; Petroc Sumner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Optimal performance in a countermanding saccade task.

Authors:  Kongfatt Wong-Lin; Philip Eckhoff; Philip Holmes; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.