Literature DB >> 17445911

The sensitivity and psychometric properties of a brief computer-based cognitive screening battery in a depression clinic.

Scott A Langenecker1, Angela F Caveney, Bruno Giordani, Elizabeth A Young, Kristy A Nielson, Lisa J Rapport, Linas A Bieliauskas, Matthew J Mordhorst, Sheila Marcus, Naomi Yodkovik, Kevin Kerber, Stanley Berent, Jon-Kar Zubieta.   

Abstract

At present, there is poor accuracy in assessing cognitive and vegetative symptoms in depression using clinician or self-rated measures, suggesting the need for development of standardized tasks to assess these functions. The current study assessed the psychometric properties and diagnostic specificity of a brief neuropsychological screening battery designed to assess core signs of depression; psychomotor retardation, attention and executive functioning difficulties, and impaired emotion perception within an outpatient psychiatry setting. Three hundred eighty-four patients with mood disorders and 77 healthy volunteers participated. A large percentage of patients met diagnostic criteria for Major Depressive Disorder alone (49%) or with another comorbid psychiatric disorder (24%). A brief, 25-min battery of computer-based tests was administered to control participants and patients measuring the constructs of inhibitory control, attention, visual perception, and both executive and visual processing speed. The patient groups performed significantly worse than the control group regardless of diagnosis on visual perception and attention accuracy and processing speed factors. Surprisingly, the anxiety disorder group performed better than several other psychiatric disorder groups in inhibitory control accuracy. Developing valid and reliable measures of cognitive signs in mood disorders creates excellent opportunities for tracking cognitive status prior to initiation of treatment, and allows for reliable retest following treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17445911     DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2006.03.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


  29 in total

1.  Developing Dimensional, Pandiagnostic Inhibitory Control Constructs With Self-Report and Neuropsychological Data.

Authors:  Natania A Crane; Alvaro Vergés; Masoud Kamali; Runa Bhaumik; Kelly A Ryan; David F Marshall; Erika F H Saunders; Michelle T Kassel; Anne L Weldon; Melvin G McInnis; Scott A Langenecker
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2018-02-06

2.  Gender-specific disruptions in emotion processing in younger adults with depression.

Authors:  Sara L Wright; Scott A Langenecker; Patricia J Deldin; Lisa J Rapport; Kristy A Nielson; Allison M Kade; Lawrence S Own; Huda Akil; Elizabeth A Young; Jon-Kar Zubieta
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.505

3.  Domain-specific impairment in cognitive control among remitted youth with a history of major depression.

Authors:  Amy T Peters; Rachel H Jacobs; Natania A Crane; Kelly A Ryan; Sara L Weisenbach; Olusola Ajilore; Melissa Lamar; Michelle T Kassel; Laura B Gabriel; Amy E West; Jon-Kar Zubieta; Scott A Langenecker
Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.732

4.  Shared dimensions of performance and activation dysfunction in cognitive control in females with mood disorders.

Authors:  Kelly A Ryan; Erica L Dawson; Michelle T Kassel; Anne L Weldon; David F Marshall; Kortni K Meyers; Laura B Gabriel; Aaron C Vederman; Sara L Weisenbach; Melvin G McInnis; Jon-Kar Zubieta; Scott A Langenecker
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Reduced emotion processing efficiency in healthy males relative to females.

Authors:  Sara L Weisenbach; Lisa J Rapport; Emily M Briceno; Brennan D Haase; Aaron C Vederman; Linas A Bieliauskas; Robert C Welsh; Monica N Starkman; Melvin G McInnis; Jon-Kar Zubieta; Scott A Langenecker
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Attenuated intrinsic connectivity within cognitive control network among individuals with remitted depression: Temporal stability and association with negative cognitive styles.

Authors:  Jonathan P Stange; Katie L Bessette; Lisanne M Jenkins; Amy T Peters; Claudia Feldhaus; Natania A Crane; Olusola Ajilore; Rachel H Jacobs; Edward R Watkins; Scott A Langenecker
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Current Neural and Behavioral Dimensional Constructs across Mood Disorders.

Authors:  Scott A Langenecker; Rachel H Jacobs; Alessandra M Passarotti
Journal:  Curr Behav Neurosci Rep       Date:  2014-09-01

8.  Differential engagement of cognitive control regions and subgenual cingulate based upon presence or absence of comorbid anxiety with depression.

Authors:  Lisanne M Jenkins; Jonathan P Stange; Katie L Bessette; Yi-Shin Chang; Samantha D Corwin; Kristy A Skerrett; Víctor G Patrón; Jon-Kar Zubieta; Natania A Crane; Alessandra M Passarotti; Daniel S Pine; Scott A Langenecker
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.839

9.  Equivalent linear change in cognition between individuals with bipolar disorder and healthy controls over 5 years.

Authors:  Kelly A Ryan; Shervin Assari; Kaley Angers; David F Marshall; Kristin Hinrichs; Rebecca Easter; Pallavi Babu; Bethany D Pester; Scott A Langenecker; Melvin G McInnis
Journal:  Bipolar Disord       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 6.744

10.  Factor structure, construct validity, and age- and education-based normative data for the Parametric Go/No-Go Test.

Authors:  Kristen L Votruba; Scott A Langenecker
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.