Literature DB >> 25818869

Shared dimensions of performance and activation dysfunction in cognitive control in females with mood disorders.

Kelly A Ryan1, Erica L Dawson2, Michelle T Kassel3, Anne L Weldon3, David F Marshall3, Kortni K Meyers3, Laura B Gabriel3, Aaron C Vederman4, Sara L Weisenbach5, Melvin G McInnis3, Jon-Kar Zubieta3, Scott A Langenecker2.   

Abstract

Major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder share symptoms that may reflect core mood disorder features. This has led to the pursuit of intermediate phenotypes and a dimensional approach to understand neurobiological disruptions in mood disorders. Executive dysfunction, including cognitive control, may represent a promising intermediate phenotype across major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder. This study examined dimensions of cognitive control in women with major depressive disorder or bipolar disorder in comparison to healthy control subjects using two separate, consecutive experiments. For Experiment 1, participants completed a behavioural cognitive control task (healthy controls = 150, major depressive disorder = 260, bipolar disorder = 202; age range 17-84 years). A sample of those participants (healthy controls = 17, major depressive disorder = 19, and bipolar disorder = 16) completed a similar cognitive control task in an event-related design functional magnetic resonance imaging protocol for Experiment 2. Results for Experiment 1 showed greater impairments on the cognitive control task in patients with mood disorders relative to healthy controls (P < 0.001), with more of those in the mood disorder group falling into the 'impaired' range when using clinical cut-offs (<5th percentile). Experiment 2 revealed only a few areas of shared activation differences in mood disorder greater than healthy controls. Activation analyses using performance as a regressor, irrespective of diagnosis, revealed within and extra-network areas that were more active in poor performers. In summary, performance and activation during cognitive control tasks may represent an intermediate phenotype for mood disorders. However, cognitive control dysfunction is not uniform across women with mood disorders, and activation is linked to performance more so than disease. These findings support subtype and dimensional approaches to understanding risk and expression of mood disorders and are a promising area of inquiry, in line with the Research Domain Criteria initiative of NIMH.
© The Author (2015). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bipolar disorder; cognitive control; dimensional; major depression; mood disorders

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25818869      PMCID: PMC4840457          DOI: 10.1093/brain/awv070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  41 in total

1.  Differences in the functional neuroanatomy of inhibitory control across the adult life span.

Authors:  Kristy A Nielson; Scott A Langenecker; Hugh Garavan
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2002-03

2.  The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.

Authors:  K Kroenke; R L Spitzer; J B Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  The definition and meaning of treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  H A Sackeim
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.384

4.  Factor structure, construct validity, and age- and education-based normative data for the Parametric Go/No-Go Test.

Authors:  Kristen L Votruba; Scott A Langenecker
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.475

5.  Abnormal amygdala-prefrontal effective connectivity to happy faces differentiates bipolar from major depression.

Authors:  Jorge Renner Cardoso de Almeida; Amelia Versace; Andrea Mechelli; Stefanie Hassel; Karina Quevedo; David Jerome Kupfer; Mary Louise Phillips
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2009-05-17       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 6.  A neural model of voluntary and automatic emotion regulation: implications for understanding the pathophysiology and neurodevelopment of bipolar disorder.

Authors:  M L Phillips; C D Ladouceur; W C Drevets
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 15.992

Review 7.  Epistasis and its implications for personal genetics.

Authors:  Jason H Moore; Scott M Williams
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Amygdala volume in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging studies.

Authors:  J P Hamilton; M Siemer; I H Gotlib
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 15.992

9.  Perceptions and impact of bipolar disorder: how far have we really come? Results of the national depressive and manic-depressive association 2000 survey of individuals with bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Robert M A Hirschfeld; Lydia Lewis; Lana A Vornik
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.384

10.  Genetic variation in the serotonin transporter modulates neural system-wide response to fearful faces.

Authors:  S A Surguladze; A Elkin; C Ecker; S Kalidindi; A Corsico; V Giampietro; N Lawrence; Q Deeley; D G M Murphy; K Kucharska-Pietura; T A Russell; P McGuffin; R Murray; M L Phillips
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.449

View more
  7 in total

1.  Acute cortisol reactivity attenuates engagement of fronto-parietal and striatal regions during emotion processing in negative mood disorders.

Authors:  Amy T Peters; Anna Van Meter; Patrick J Pruitt; Emily M Briceño; Kelly A Ryan; Melissa Hagan; Anne L Weldon; Michelle T Kassel; Aaron Vederman; Jon-Kar Zubieta; Melvin McInnis; Sara L Weisenbach; Scott A Langenecker
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 4.905

2.  Multidimensional prediction of treatment response to antidepressants with cognitive control and functional MRI.

Authors:  Natania A Crane; Lisanne M Jenkins; Runa Bhaumik; Catherine Dion; Jennifer R Gowins; Brian J Mickey; Jon-Kar Zubieta; Scott A Langenecker
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 3.  Six Years of Research on the National Institute of Mental Health's Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Initiative: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Dean Carcone; Anthony C Ruocco
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 5.505

4.  Exercise Intensity-Dependent Effects on Cognitive Control Function during and after Acute Treadmill Running in Young Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Martin Wohlwend; Alexander Olsen; Asta K Håberg; Helen S Palmer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-21

5.  White matter abnormalities in adults with bipolar disorder type-II and unipolar depression.

Authors:  Anna Manelis; Adriane Soehner; Yaroslav O Halchenko; Skye Satz; Rachel Ragozzino; Mora Lucero; Holly A Swartz; Mary L Phillips; Amelia Versace
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Cohort Profile: The Heinz C. Prechter Longitudinal Study of Bipolar Disorder.

Authors:  Melvin G McInnis; Shervin Assari; Masoud Kamali; Kelly Ryan; Scott A Langenecker; Erika F H Saunders; Kritika Versha; Simon Evans; K Sue O'Shea; Emily Mower Provost; David Marshall; Daniel Forger; Patricia Deldin; Sebastian Zoellner
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Cognitive control and network disruption in remitted depression: a correlate of childhood adversity.

Authors:  Meghan E Quinn; Jonathan P Stange; Lisanne M Jenkins; Samantha Corwin; Sophie R DelDonno; Katie L Bessette; Robert C Welsh; Scott A Langenecker
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.436

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.