Literature DB >> 17445901

Evaluation of deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty surgery using scatterometry and wavefront analyses.

Holly B Hindman1, Russell L McCally, Elliot Myrowitz, Mark A Terry, Walter J Stark, Robert S Weinberg, Albert S Jun.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if postsurgical corneal interface abnormalities after deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK) cause increased light scattering or wavefront aberrations that may help to explain decreased best-corrected visual acuity in DLEK patients compared with penetrating keratoplasty (PK) patients.
DESIGN: Prospective comparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: Clinically clear corneas of 4 eyes that had undergone DLEK surgery and 4 eyes that had PK were studied. Normal control data for light scattering was collected from 12 right eyes and 11 left eyes with normal corneas.
METHODS: Corneal light scattering was measured with a scatterometer designed at the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, and wavefront analysis was performed using standard methods with a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Corneal scattering measurements were normalized by taking the ratio of the subject's corneal light scattering to a reference material. A scattering index was calculated as the ratio of the normalized scattering for a given patient's cornea to the average scattering of normal corneas. Astigmatism and higher-order aberrations were analyzed using standard data output from wavefront analysis and Zernike polynomial decomposition.
RESULTS: The mean scattering index was significantly higher after DLEK (1.78+/-0.29, mean+/-standard deviation [SD]) than after PK (1.03+/-0.27; P = 0.043). The higher-order root mean square (RMS) wavefront error was significantly higher after PK (0.71+/-0.11 microm, mean+/-SD) than after DLEK (0.44+/-0.12 microm; P = 0.029). Zernike polynomial decomposition of the wavefront aberrations revealed that regular corneal astigmatism was the most important aberration component for both PK and DLEK, but the PK patients had significantly more regular astigmatism (1.7+/-0.45 diopters [D], mean+/-SD) than did the DLEK patients (0.84+/-0.27 D; P = 0.029).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data quantitatively support subclinical corneal haze as an explanation for the limited visual acuity after DLEK as compared with PK. Intraoperative or postoperative modifications to reduce stromal haze after DLEK may result in better visual acuity outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17445901     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  16 in total

1.  Standardization of corneal haze measurement in confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Jay W McLaren; William M Bourne; Sanjay V Patel
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 2.  [Application of wavefront analysis in clinical and scientific settings. From irregular astigmatism to aberrations of a higher order--Part II: examples].

Authors:  J Bühren; T Kohnen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Graft thickness, graft folds, and aberrations after descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty for fuchs dystrophy.

Authors:  Loren S Seery; Cherie B Nau; Jay W McLaren; Keith H Baratz; Sanjay V Patel
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Effect of trabeculectomy on ocular and corneal higher order aberrations.

Authors:  Shima Fukuoka; Shiro Amano; Norihiko Honda; Tatsuya Mimura; Tomohiko Usui; Makoto Araie
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Quantifying intraocular scatter with near diffraction-limited double-pass point spread function.

Authors:  Junlei Zhao; Fei Xiao; Jian Kang; Haoxin Zhao; Yun Dai; Yudong Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 6.  Effect of corneal light scatter on vision: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Leopoldo Spadea; Giorgia Maraone; Francesca Verboschi; Enzo Maria Vingolo; Daniele Tognetto
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Thinning rate over 24 months in ultrathin DSAEK.

Authors:  Matthew T Fenech; Giulia Coco; Luca Pagano; Kunal A Gadhvi; Mitchell Titley; Hannah J Levis; Mohit Parekh; Stephen B Kaye; Vito Romano
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 4.456

8.  Differences in the TGF-{beta}1-induced profibrotic response of anterior and posterior corneal keratocytes in vitro.

Authors:  Holly B Hindman; Jennifer N Swanton; Richard P Phipps; Patricia J Sime; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Post-DSAEK optical changes: a comprehensive prospective analysis on the role of ocular wavefront aberrations, haze, and corneal thickness.

Authors:  Holly B Hindman; Krystel R Huxlin; Seth M Pantanelli; Christine L Callan; Ramkumar Sabesan; Steven S T Ching; Brooke E Miller; Tim Martin; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.651

10.  In vivo and in vitro analysis of topographic changes secondary to DSAEK venting incisions.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Monette T Lependu; Dane Church; Marcus C Neuffer
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.