Literature DB >> 17443331

Myocardial tagging with steady state free precession techniques and semi-automatic postprocessing--impact on diagnostic value.

Thorsten R C Johnson1, Nicole Bayrhof, Armin Huber, Joost P A Kuijer, Roger Luechinger, Olaf Dietrich, Dietrich Stoevesandt, Dorthe Pedersen, Maximilian F Reiser, Stefan O Schoenberg.   

Abstract

Our aim was to determine the diagnostic value of myocardial tagging sequences with regard to the evaluable share of the cardiac cycle. Thirty-three patients were examined at 1.5 T using tagging sequences with gradient-echo (GRE) readout, 18 patients at 1.5 T with steady-state free precession (SSFP), and 11 patients at 3 T using GRE. Two observers graded image quality and determined the share of the cardiac cycle for which postprocessing could be performed (1, optimal; 2, little interaction; 3, whole cycle assessable; 4, diastole non-assessable; 5, systole incomplete; 6, non-diagnostic). With GRE at 1.5 T, median image quality was 4.0 (95% CI 4.0-5.0), while it was significantly better with 2.0 (2.0-3.0) using the SSFP technique and similar at 3 T with 2.9 (1.7-3.5). With GRE at 1.5 T, systole could be assessed in 69% of patients, and an evaluation of the whole cardiac cycle was not possible. With the SSFP sequence at 1.5 T and GRE at 3 T, an evaluation of the whole cardiac cycle was possible in 71% and 70% of the patients, respectively, and systole was assessable in all patients. Tagging sequences with SSFP readout at 1.5 T make a semi-automatic evaluation of the whole cardiac cycle feasible in a large share of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17443331     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0639-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  26 in total

1.  Myocardial tagging with SSFP.

Authors:  Daniel A Herzka; Michael A Guttman; Elliot R McVeigh
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Comparison between tagged MRI and standard cine MRI for evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  Christophe Dornier; G Aernout Somsen; Marko K Ivancevic; Nael F Osman; Dominique Didier; Alberto Righetti; Jean-Paul Vallée
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-04-06       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  [Quantitative analysis of left ventricular wall motion with MRI tagging].

Authors:  T Johnson; D Hahn; J Sandstede
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Influence of high magnetic field strengths and parallel acquisition strategies on image quality in cardiac 2D CINE magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of 1.5 T vs. 3.0 T.

Authors:  Matthias Gutberlet; Kerstin Schwinge; Patrick Freyhardt; Birgit Spors; Matthias Grothoff; Timm Denecke; Lutz Lüdemann; Ralph Noeske; Thoralf Niendorf; Roland Felix
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  [Cardiac MR tagging: optimization of sequence parameters and comparison at 1.5 T and 3.0 T in a volunteer study].

Authors:  U Kramer; V Deshpande; M Fenchel; B Klumpp; G Laub; J P Finn; C D Claussen; S Miller
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2006-02-10

6.  Improved myocardial tagging contrast.

Authors:  S E Fischer; G C McKinnon; S E Maier; P Boesiger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Quantification of regional contractile function after infarction: strain analysis superior to wall thickening analysis in discriminating infarct from remote myocardium.

Authors:  M J Götte; A C van Rossum; J T Marcus; C A Visser
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Diagnosis of coronary artery disease with dobutamine-stress MRI.

Authors:  Dirkjan Kuijpers
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Assessment of systolic and diastolic LV function by MR myocardial tagging.

Authors:  C Matter; E Nagel; M Stuber; P Boesiger; O M Hess
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 17.165

10.  Human heart: tagging with MR imaging--a method for noninvasive assessment of myocardial motion.

Authors:  E A Zerhouni; D M Parish; W J Rogers; A Yang; E P Shapiro
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Myocardial MR tagging: analysis of regional and global myocardial function].

Authors:  U Kramer; A Hennemuth; M Fenchel
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  Myocardial tagging by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: evolution of techniques--pulse sequences, analysis algorithms, and applications.

Authors:  El-Sayed H Ibrahim
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 5.364

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.