Literature DB >> 17442592

Anisotropy in the visual cortex investigated by neuronavigated transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Thomas Kammer1, Michael Vorwerg, Bärbel Herrnberger.   

Abstract

Responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex depend on the direction of the induced current with an optimum perpendicular to the orientation of the precentral gyrus. Little is known about anisotropy in other cortical regions. We measured phosphene thresholds in the visual cortex using a frameless neuronavigation system. Comparing horizontal and vertical current orientation as well as monophasic and biphasic pulses in 7 subjects, we found lower thresholds with biphasic pulses and a tendency for lower thresholds with horizontal currents. When varying current directions in steps of 45 degrees centered on a hot spot over the occipital cortex, in 10 out of 12 measurements optimal current orientation ran perpendicular to the underlying gyrus (mean deviation 14.6 degrees). Optimal current orientation was determined as the orientation of the second eigenvector from the covariance matrix of the stimulation sites that had been shifted along the respective current direction by the amount of the measured threshold. Individual cortical architecture was obtained by segmentation of a 3d anatomical MR scan, with large interindividual differences among the orientations of the stimulated gyrus. As with the motor system, the optimum threshold with biphasic pulses was flipped about 180 degrees compared to the optimum with monophasic pulses (p<.02) throughout subjects, suggesting both similar anisotropic properties of networks in the visual and motor cortices and the existence of anisotropic behaviour in any cortical region. As a consequence, optimal TMS application should always take into account the individual orientation of the gyrus to be stimulated.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17442592     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  19 in total

1.  Exploring the after-effects of theta burst magnetic stimulation on the human motor cortex: a functional imaging study.

Authors:  Lizbeth Cárdenas-Morales; Georg Grön; Thomas Kammer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Determining which mechanisms lead to activation in the motor cortex: a modeling study of transcranial magnetic stimulation using realistic stimulus waveforms and sulcal geometry.

Authors:  R Salvador; S Silva; P J Basser; P C Miranda
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Is selective primary visual cortex stimulation achievable with TMS?

Authors:  Niina Salminen-Vaparanta; Valdas Noreika; Antti Revonsuo; Mika Koivisto; Simo Vanni
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  The development and modelling of devices and paradigms for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Zhi-De Deng
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04-26

5.  Effective connectivity between human supplementary motor area and primary motor cortex: a paired-coil TMS study.

Authors:  Noritoshi Arai; Ming-Kuei Lu; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  How does transcranial magnetic stimulation modify neuronal activity in the brain? Implications for studies of cognition.

Authors:  Hartwig R Siebner; Gesa Hartwigsen; Tanja Kassuba; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Optimization of multifocal transcranial current stimulation for weighted cortical pattern targeting from realistic modeling of electric fields.

Authors:  Giulio Ruffini; Michael D Fox; Oscar Ripolles; Pedro Cavaleiro Miranda; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  The cortical site of visual suppression by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  A Thielscher; A Reichenbach; K Uğurbil; K Uludağ
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Contributions of the PPC to online control of visually guided reaching movements assessed with fMRI-guided TMS.

Authors:  Alexandra Reichenbach; Jean-Pierre Bresciani; Angelika Peer; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Axel Thielscher
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Rhythmic TMS causes local entrainment of natural oscillatory signatures.

Authors:  Gregor Thut; Domenica Veniero; Vincenzo Romei; Carlo Miniussi; Philippe Schyns; Joachim Gross
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.