Literature DB >> 17442362

Binocular influences on global motion processing in the human visual system.

R F Hess1, C V Hutchinson, T Ledgeway, B Mansouri.   

Abstract

This study investigates four key issues concerning the binocular properties of the mechanisms that encode global motion in human vision: (1) the extent of any binocular advantage; (2) the possible site of this binocular summation; (3) whether or not purely monocular inputs exist for global motion perception; (4) the extent of any dichoptic interaction. Global motion coherence thresholds were measured using random-dot-kinematograms as a function of the dot modulation depth (contrast) for translational, radial and circular flow fields. We found a marked binocular advantage of approximately 1.7, comparable for all three types of motion and the performance benefit was due to a contrast rather than a global motion enhancement. In addition, we found no evidence for any purely monocular influences on global motion detection. The results suggest that the site of binocular combination for global motion perception occurs prior to the extra-striate cortex where motion integration occurs. All cells involved are binocular and exhibit dichoptic interactions, suggesting the existence of a neural mechanism that involves more than just simple summation of the two monocular inputs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17442362     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  15 in total

1.  Global motion perception is independent from contrast sensitivity for coherent motion direction discrimination and visual acuity in 4.5-year-old children.

Authors:  Arijit Chakraborty; Nicola S Anstice; Robert J Jacobs; Nabin Paudel; Linda L LaGasse; Barry M Lester; Trecia A Wouldes; Jane E Harding; Benjamin Thompson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Binocular summation for reflexive eye movements.

Authors:  Christian Quaia; Lance M Optican; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Rebalancing binocular vision in amblyopia.

Authors:  Jian Ding; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Issues Revisited: Shifts in Binocular Balance Depend on the Deprivation Duration in Normal and Amblyopic Adults.

Authors:  Seung Hyun Min; Yiya Chen; Nan Jiang; Zhifen He; Jiawei Zhou; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2022-08-25

5.  Visual motion integration of bidirectional transparent motion in mouse opto-locomotor reflexes.

Authors:  L A M H Kirkels; W Zhang; Z Rezvani; R J A van Wezel; M M van Wanrooij
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Assessing binocular interaction in amblyopia and its clinical feasibility.

Authors:  MiYoung Kwon; Zhong-Lin Lu; Alexandra Miller; Melanie Kazlas; David G Hunter; Peter J Bex
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Binocular combination of stimulus orientation.

Authors:  O Yehezkel; J Ding; A Sterkin; U Polat; D M Levi
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Practice makes the deficiency of global motion detection in people with pattern-related visual stress more apparent.

Authors:  Ding Han; Jana Wegrzyn; Hua Bi; Ruihua Wei; Bin Zhang; Xiaorong Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Motion perception: a review of developmental changes and the role of early visual experience.

Authors:  Batsheva Hadad; Sivan Schwartz; Daphne Maurer; Terri L Lewis
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-15

10.  Spatial-frequency dependent binocular imbalance in amblyopia.

Authors:  MiYoung Kwon; Emily Wiecek; Steven C Dakin; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.