Literature DB >> 17440644

Quality indicators for cardiovascular primary care.

Frederick I Burge1, Kelly Bower, Wayne Putnam, Jafna L Cox.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Canadian Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Team was established in 2001 to improve the quality of cardiovascular care for Canadians. Initially, quality indicators (QIs) for hospital-based care for those with acute myocardial infarctions and congestive heart failure were developed and measured. Qualitative research on the acceptability of those indicators concluded that indicators were needed for ambulatory primary care practice, where the bulk of cardiovascular disease care occurs.
OBJECTIVES: To systematically develop QIs for primary care practice for the primary prevention and chronic disease management of ischemic heart disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and heart failure.
METHODS: A four-stage modified Delphi approach was used and included a literature review of evidence-based practice guidelines and previously developed QIs; the development and circulation of a survey tool with proposed QIs, asking respondents to rate each indicator for validity, necessity to record and feasibility to collect; an in-person meeting of respondents to resolve rating and content discrepancies, and suggest additional QIs; and recirculation of the survey tool for rating of additional QIs. Participants from across Canada included family physicians, primary care nurses, an emergency room family physician and cardiologists.
RESULTS: 31 QIs were agreed on, nine of which were for primary prevention and 22 of which were for chronic disease management.
CONCLUSIONS: A core set of QIs for ambulatory primary care practice has been developed as a tool for practitioners to evaluate the quality of cardiovascular disease care. While the participants rated the indicators as feasible to collect, the next step will be to conduct field validation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17440644      PMCID: PMC2649189          DOI: 10.1016/s0828-282x(07)70772-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Cardiol        ISSN: 0828-282X            Impact factor:   5.223


  27 in total

1.  Measuring and improving quality of care: a report from the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology First Scientific Forum on Assessment of Healthcare Quality in Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke.

Authors: 
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  New Zealand and United Kingdom experiences with the RAND modified Delphi approach to producing angina and heart failure criteria for quality assessment in general practice.

Authors:  S A Buetow; G D Coster
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-12

3.  Hospitalization for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions: a method for comparative access and quality studies using routinely collected statistics.

Authors:  A D Brown; M J Goldacre; N Hicks; J T Rourke; R Y McMurtry; J D Brown; G M Anderson
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

Review 4.  Introduction to the Canadian Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Team's (CCORT) Canadian Cardiovascular Atlas project.

Authors:  Jack V Tu; Susan E Brien; Courtney C Kennedy; Louise Pilote; William A Ghali
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 5.223

5.  Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care.

Authors:  S M Campbell; J Braspenning; A Hutchinson; M Marshall
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-12

6.  Can health care quality indicators be transferred between countries?

Authors:  M N Marshall; P G Shekelle; E A McGlynn; S Campbell; R H Brook; M O Roland
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-02

7.  Selecting common measures of quality and system performance.

Authors:  Elizabeth A McGlynn
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Physician characteristics in relation to cardiovascular drugs commonly prescribed for hypertension in Nova Scotia.

Authors:  F Burge; G Kephart; G Flowerdew; W Putnam; D G Comeau; A M Whelan; I Sketris; D Sclar
Journal:  Can J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001

9.  Identifying performance indicators for family practice: assessing levels of consensus.

Authors:  Jan Barnsley; Whitney Berta; Rhonda Cockerill; Judith MacPhail; Eugene Vayda
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  CCORT/CCS quality indicators for acute myocardial infarction care.

Authors:  Chau T T Tran; Douglas S Lee; Virginia F Flintoft; Lyall Higginson; F Curry Grant; Jack V Tu; Jafna Cox; Doug Holder; Cynthia Jackevicius; Louise Pilote; Paul Tanser; Christopher Thompson; Edward Tsoi; Wayne Warnica; Andreas Wielgosz
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.223

View more
  13 in total

1.  Harmonization of guidelines for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease: the C-CHANGE Initiative.

Authors:  Sheldon W Tobe; James A Stone; Melissa Brouwers; Onil Bhattacharyya; Kimberly M Walker; Martin Dawes; Jacques Genest; Steven Grover; Gordon Gubitz; David Lau; Andrew Pipe; Peter Selby; Mark S Tremblay; Darren E R Warburton; Richard Ward; Vincent Woo; Lawrence A Leiter; Peter P Liu
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  The Cardiovascular Health in Ambulatory Care Research Team performance indicators for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a modified Delphi panel study.

Authors:  Jack V Tu; Laura C Maclagan; Dennis T Ko; Clare L Atzema; Gillian L Booth; Sharon Johnston; Karen Tu; Douglas S Lee; Arlene Bierman; Ruth Hall; R Sacha Bhatia; Andrea S Gershon; Sheldon W Tobe; Claudia Sanmartin; Peter Liu; Anna Chu
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2017-04-25

Review 3.  The 2010 Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines for the diagnosis and management of heart failure update: Heart failure in ethnic minority populations, heart failure and pregnancy, disease management, and quality improvement/assurance programs.

Authors:  Jonathan G Howlett; Robert S McKelvie; Jeannine Costigan; Anique Ducharme; Estrellita Estrella-Holder; Justin A Ezekowitz; Nadia Giannetti; Haissam Haddad; George A Heckman; Anthony M Herd; Debra Isaac; Simon Kouz; Kori Leblanc; Peter Liu; Elizabeth Mann; Gordon W Moe; Eileen O'Meara; Miroslav Rajda; Samuel Siu; Paul Stolee; Elizabeth Swiggum; Shelley Zeiroth
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.223

4.  Developing Indicators of Service Quality Provided for CardiovascularPatients Hospitalized in Cardiac Care Unit.

Authors:  Saber Azami-Aghdash; Samad Ghaffari; Homayoun Sadeghi-Bazargani; Jafar-Sadegh Tabrizi; Alireza Yagoubi; Mohammad Naghavi-Behzad
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Thorac Res       Date:  2013-03-18

5.  Quality indicators for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in primary care.

Authors:  Jessica Hopkins; Gina Agarwal; Lisa Dolovich
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 6.  Methods for the guideline-based development of quality indicators--a systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas Kötter; Eva Blozik; Martin Scherer
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  Development and pilot of an internationally standardized measure of cardiovascular risk management in European primary care.

Authors:  Sabine Ludt; Stephen M Campbell; Jan van Lieshout; Richard Grol; Joachim Szecsenyi; Michel Wensing
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Feedback GAP: study protocol for a cluster-randomized trial of goal setting and action plans to increase the effectiveness of audit and feedback interventions in primary care.

Authors:  Noah M Ivers; Karen Tu; Jill Francis; Jan Barnsley; Baiju Shah; Ross Upshur; Alex Kiss; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Merrick Zwarenstein
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Protocol for a scoping review study to identify and classify patient-centred quality indicators.

Authors:  Rachel J Jolley; Diane L Lorenzetti; Kimberly Manalili; Mingshan Lu; Hude Quan; Maria J Santana
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Feedback GAP: pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial of goal setting and action plans to increase the effectiveness of audit and feedback interventions in primary care.

Authors:  Noah M Ivers; Karen Tu; Jacqueline Young; Jill J Francis; Jan Barnsley; Baiju R Shah; Ross E Upshur; Rahim Moineddin; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Merrick Zwarenstein
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.