Literature DB >> 17440339

A retrospective analysis of patient satisfaction with immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction: comparison of three common procedures.

Alexandrina S Saulis1, Thomas A Mustoe, Neil A Fine.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The authors aimed to quantify overall patient satisfaction with three breast reconstruction techniques and identify factors that have influenced satisfaction.
METHODS: Two hundred sixty-eight questionnaires were mailed at least 6 months after immediate breast reconstruction to consecutive breast reconstruction patients over a 3-year period. A second questionnaire was sent out 9 months later to the tissue expander/implant group of patients.
RESULTS: The initial questionnaire demonstrated that overall satisfaction was significantly greater in the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap patients as compared with the tissue expander/implant patients (p < 0.05). However, the number of patients willing to repeat the procedure and recommend their procedure to a friend was similar among all three reconstructive techniques. A significantly greater number of tissue expander/implant patients as compared with TRAM flap patients felt they had not received sufficient information to make an educated decision (p < 0.05). This finding correlated with the lower satisfaction rate among the tissue expander/implant patients. The second questionnaire sent only to the tissue expander/implant patients revealed that the majority felt uninformed about the final aesthetic outcome and the frequency and pain associated with the expansion process.
CONCLUSIONS: All three groups may claim to be satisfied with their own personal choices. Many patients will continue to choose tissue expander/implant reconstruction in an effort to avoid scars and more extensive surgery. Being less satisfied is not wrong or bad, provided it is known. Tissue expander/implant patients should be thoroughly informed in the preoperative setting about the final aesthetic outcomes and the immediate perioperative expansion period, which may involve a considerable amount of patient commitment and discomfort in some women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17440339     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000258827.21635.84

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  17 in total

1.  [Certified breast centers in Germany : How much is plastic surgery involved?].

Authors:  M V Meyer-Marcotty; J Redeker; K Knobloch; M A Altintas; P M Vogt
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Single-stage immediate breast reconstruction using a skin-sparing incision and definitive saline implants compared with a two-stage reconstruction using tissue expansion plus implants.

Authors:  Mathew A Plant; Christopher G Scilley; Mark Speechley
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2009

Review 3.  Developing a theoretical framework to illustrate associations among patient satisfaction, body image and quality of life for women undergoing breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Michelle Cororve Fingeret; Summer W Nipomnick; Melissa A Crosby; Gregory P Reece
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 12.111

Review 4.  The BREAST-Q in surgical research: A review of the literature 2009-2015.

Authors:  Wess A Cohen; Lily R Mundy; Tiffany N S Ballard; Anne Klassen; Stefan J Cano; John Browne; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Stability of Long-Term Outcomes in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: An Evaluation of 12-Year Surgeon- and Patient-Reported Outcomes in 3489 Nonirradiated and Irradiated Implants.

Authors:  Akhil K Seth; Peter G Cordeiro
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Enhancing breast projection in autologous reconstruction using the St Andrew's coning technique and 3D volumetric analysis.

Authors:  Michael P Chae; Warren Matthew Rozen; Nakul Gamanlal Patel; David J Hunter-Smith; Venkat Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-12

7.  The number of operations required for completing breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Jin Sup Eom; Mark Robert Kobayashi; Keyianoosh Paydar; Garrett A Wirth; Gregory R D Evans
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-11-07

8.  Satisfaction following Unilateral Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison of Pedicled TRAM and Free Abdominal Flaps.

Authors:  Jonathan A Schwitzer; H Catherine Miller; Andrea L Pusic; Evan Matros; Babak J Mehrara; Colleen M McCarthy; Peter A Lennox; Nancy Van Laeken; Joseph J Disa
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-08-19

9.  Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life in DIEAP Flap versus Implant Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Rossella Sgarzani; Luca Negosanti; Paolo Giovanni Morselli; Veronica Vietti Michelina; Luigi Maria Lapalorcia; Riccardo Cipriani
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2015-11-16

10.  The Type of Breast Reconstruction May Not Influence Patient Satisfaction in the Chinese Population: A Single Institutional Experience.

Authors:  Benlong Yang; Lin Li; Wenhui Yan; Jiaying Chen; Ying Chen; Zhen Hu; Guangyu Liu; Zhenzhou Shen; Zhimin Shao; Jiong Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.