Literature DB >> 17439711

Efficacy of new LED light-curing units in hardening of Class II composite restorations.

Omar El-Mowafy1, Wafa El-Badrawy, Mira Wasef, Hanan Omar, Sanaz Kermanshahi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of new light-emitting diode (LED) curing units in the hardening of Class II composite restorations. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Disk specimens 2 mm in diameter and 2.5 mm thick were prepared from 2 composites (Vit-l-escence, shade A3, Ultradent; Herculite XRV, shade A2, Kerr) in the following manner. An extracted permanent molar tooth was prepared to receive a Class II restoration with proximal slot only. The tooth was sectioned horizontally on a plane above the gingival floor level such that the remaining depth of the proximal box was 4 mm. A Tofflemire matrix band and retainer were secured around the tooth. Composite specimens were placed below the tooth to coincide with the location of the slot opening at the bottom of the gingival floor. The specimens were subjected to light polymerization with various combinations of curing cycle and light unit: 1 of 3 continuous curing cycles (20 seconds, 40 seconds or 60 seconds) and 1 of 2 LED units (Utralume-5, Ultradent; IQ Smartlite, Dentsply) or a control quartz-tungsten-halogen (QTH) unit (Optilux 501, Kerr). Specimens were stored at 37 degrees C for 24 hours. A hardness tester was used to obtain 4 measurements of Knoop hardness number (KHN) for each surface (upper and lower) of each specimen. Relative hardness (RH) was calculated as the KHN of the lower surface divided by the KHN of the upper surface. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey"s test.
RESULTS: ANOVA indicated significant differences in mean RH among the groups (p < 0.001). RH increased with increasing curing time. For the 60-second cycle with Vit-l-escence composite, mean RH was 0.47, 0.25 and 0.39 for the Ultralume-5, IQ Smartlite and Optilux 501 curing units, respectively. For the 60-second cycle with Herculite XRV composite, mean RH was 0.71, 0.81 and 0.56 for the Ultralume-5, IQ Smartlite and Optilux 501 curing units, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In general, the 2 LED units performed as well as the QTH unit; however, brand of composite and curing cycle had significant effects on RH values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17439711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc        ISSN: 0709-8936            Impact factor:   1.316


  10 in total

1.  Diode-pumped solid-state laser for bonding orthodontic brackets: effect of light intensity and light-curing time.

Authors:  Young-Oh Kim; Soo-Byung Park; Woo-Sung Son; Ching-Chang Ko; Franklin García-Godoy; Hyung-Il Kim; Yong Hoon Kwon
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Mechanical properties of composite resins light-cured using a blue DPSS laser.

Authors:  Du-Man Baek; Jeong-Kil Park; Sung-Ae Son; Ching-Chang Ko; Franklin Garcia-Godoy; Hyung-Il Kim; Yong Hoon Kwon
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Clinical long-term success of contemporary nano-filled resin composites in class I and II restorations cured by LED or halogen light.

Authors:  Torsten Pflaum; Stefan Kranz; Regina Montag; Arndt Güntsch; Andrea Völpel; Robin Mills; Klaus Jandt; Bernd Sigusch
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Temperature changes caused by light curing of fiber-reinforced composite resins.

Authors:  Nurcan Ozakar Ilday; Omer Sagsoz; Ozcan Karatas; Yusuf Ziya Bayindir; Neslihan Çelik
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2015 May-Jun

5.  Composite resin color stability: influence of light sources and immersion media.

Authors:  Patricia Aleixo dos Santos Domingos; Patrícia Petromilli Nordi Sasso Garcia; Ana Luisa Botta Martins de Oliveira; Regina Guenka Palma-Dibb
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Comparison of Surface Hardness of Various Shades of Twinky Star Colored Compomer Light-cured with QTH and LED Units.

Authors:  Effat Khodadadi; Soraya Khafri; Mahdiyeh Aziznezhad
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2016-05-25

7.  Curing efficiency of dual-cure resin cement under zirconia with two different light curing units.

Authors:  Pınar Gultekin; Elif Pak Tunc; Deger Ongul; Volkan Turp; Ozgur Bultan; Burcin Karataslı
Journal:  J Istanb Univ Fac Dent       Date:  2015-04-29

8.  Does an additional UV LED improve the degree of conversion and Knoop Hardness of light-shade composite resins?

Authors:  Maria Cecília Caldas Giorgi; Flávio Henrique Baggio Aguiar; Luís Eduardo Silva Soares; Airton Abrahão Martin; Priscila Christiane Suzy Liporoni; Luís Alexandre Maffei Sartini Paulillo
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2012-10

9.  Influence of the distance of the curing light source and composite shade on hardness of two composites.

Authors:  Thaís Thomé; Washington Steagall; Arlene Tachibana; Sheila Regina Maia Braga; Miriam Lacalle Turbino
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.698

10.  Microhardness of composite resin cured through different primary tooth thicknesses with different light intensities and curing times: In vitro study.

Authors:  Fatemeh Mazhari; Behjatolmolok Ajami; Saied Mostafa Moazzami; Bahareh Baghaee; Bahareh Hafez
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.