Literature DB >> 17439476

Species interactions and population density mediate the use of social cues for habitat selection.

Robert J Fletcher1.   

Abstract

1. The perspective that populations and communities are structured by antagonistic interactions among individuals has dominated much of ecology. Yet how animals use social information to guide decisions, such as habitat selection, may be influenced by both positive and negative interactions among individuals. Recent theory also suggests that the way animals use social information may be substantially influenced by population density, which alters the potential costs and benefits of such behaviours. 2. I manipulated cues of two competitors, the dominant least flycatcher Empidonax minimus (Baird & Baird) and the subordinate American redstart Setophaga ruticilla (Linnaeus), to assess the use of conspecific and heterospecific cues during habitat selection, and if population density influences these strategies. The experiment consisted of surveying birds during a pre-treatment year, which allows for the control and testing the effect of baseline densities, and a treatment year, in which treatments were applied just prior to settlement. Treatments included broadcasting songs of flycatchers and redstarts, and were compared with controls. 3. When controlling for pre-treatment densities, bird densities, and to a lesser extent arrival dates, during the treatment year suggested that flycatchers were attracted to both conspecific and heterospecific cues during settlement. Furthermore, attraction was strongest for flycatchers in plots with moderate pre-treatment densities. American redstarts were rare in the study area but showed apparent attraction to conspecifics and avoidance of heterospecifics. 4. These results provide experimental evidence for the use of multiple social cues in habitat selection and suggest that heterospecific attraction may operate under broader contexts than originally envisioned. In such instances, nontarget effects can potentially occur when manipulating social cues to elicit settlement in conservation strategies. The impact of population density on the use of social cues shown here can also influence our understanding of metapopulation dynamics by causing complex threshold effects on the likelihood of rescue, which may influence metapopulation stability and the likelihood of local extinction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17439476     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01230.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  20 in total

1.  Alarm calls modulate the spatial structure of a breeding owl community.

Authors:  Deseada Parejo; Jesús M Avilés; Juan Rodríguez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The type and timing of social information alters offspring production.

Authors:  Robert J Fletcher; Christine W Miller
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Too risky to settle: avian community structure changes in response to perceived predation risk on adults and offspring.

Authors:  Fangyuan Hua; Robert J Fletcher; Kathryn E Sieving; Robert M Dorazio
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Conspecifics as informers and competitors: an experimental study in foraging bumble-bees.

Authors:  Mathilde Baude; Étienne Danchin; Marianne Mugabo; Isabelle Dajoz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Adaptation and habitat selection in the eco-evolutionary process.

Authors:  Douglas W Morris
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Physical and social cues shape nest-site preference and prey capture behavior in social spiders.

Authors:  Gabriella M Najm; Angelika Pe; Jonathan N Pruitt; Noa Pinter-Wollman
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 2.671

7.  Evidence of natal habitat preference induction within one habitat type.

Authors:  Melissa J Merrick; John L Koprowski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Reconciling social interaction with habitat selection in territorial species.

Authors:  Thomas A Scott; Pey-Yi Lee
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 1.919

9.  Context-dependent dispersal, public information, and heterospecific attraction in newts.

Authors:  Hugo Cayuela; Odile Grolet; Pierre Joly
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Competition with stone crabs drives juvenile spiny lobster abundance and distribution.

Authors:  Donald C Behringer; John E Hart
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.