Literature DB >> 17438406

Cardioprotective properties of humoral factors released from rat hearts subject to ischemic preconditioning.

Fredson Costa Serejo1, Luiz Fernando Rodrigues, Kelly Campos da Silva Tavares, Antonio Carlos Campos de Carvalho, Jose Hamilton Matheus Nascimento.   

Abstract

Myocardial protection can be achieved by transfer of coronary effluent from ischemically preconditioned to non-preconditioned hearts. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that preconditioned effluent from rat hearts purified by Sep-Pak C-18 cartridges could induce remote cardioprotection against ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury through the activation of protein kinase C signaling pathway. Buffer-perfused rat hearts were subject to 30 min ischemia and 60 min reperfusion. The myocardial I/R injury was assessed by postischemic contractile function recovery and infarct size. The protective effect of coronary effluent collected during ischemic preconditioning (IPC) was tested in non-preconditioned hearts in presence or absence of a PKC inhibitor, chelerythrine. Infarct size was 17 +/- 2% in preconditioned versus 37 +/- 1% in control hearts (P < 0.001). Hearts perfused with fresh preconditioned effluent had infarct sizes of 16 +/- 3% versus 36 +/- 1% in hearts treated with non-preconditioned effluent. The cardioprotective effect was lost when the effluent was left at room temperature during 24 h (infarct size, 40 +/- 3%) or heated to 70 degrees C (26 +/- 4%, P < 0.05) or 100 degrees C (39 +/- 1%, P < 0.001). The lyophilized effluent was stable for 30 days, and its purification in a Sep-Pak C-18 column resulted in a hydrophobic fraction that reduced the infarct size to 17 +/- 2% versus 38 +/- 2% for the hydrophilic fraction. Chelerythrine (100 microM) inhibited the reduction of infarct size induced by IPC (35 +/- 4%) or hydrophobic fraction (37 +/- 3%). Recovery of the contractile function at reperfusion was higher in preconditioned group (74 +/- 6% versus 17 +/- 7% in control, P < 0.001) and hydrophobic fraction (66 +/- 7% versus 8 +/- 4% in hydrophilic fraction, P < 0.001). Similarly, chelerythrine was able to abrogate the contractile function recovery (12 +/- 6%, P < 0.001 versus preconditioned group and 19 +/- 7%, P < 0.001 versus hydrophobic fraction). In conclusion, the cardioprotective factors released in the coronary effluent by IPC are thermolabile hydrophobic substances with molecular weights higher than 3.5 kDa and acting through PKC activation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17438406     DOI: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e3180325ad9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol        ISSN: 0160-2446            Impact factor:   3.105


  38 in total

1.  Endogenous cardioprotection by ischaemic postconditioning and remote conditioning.

Authors:  Weiwei Shi; Jakob Vinten-Johansen
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 10.787

Review 2.  Ischaemic conditioning: pitfalls on the path to clinical translation.

Authors:  Karin Przyklenk
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 3.  Cardioprotection by remote ischemic conditioning and its signal transduction.

Authors:  Petra Kleinbongard; Andreas Skyschally; Gerd Heusch
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.657

Review 4.  Cardioprotection by remote ischemic conditioning: Mechanisms and clinical evidences.

Authors:  Alberto Aimo; Chiara Borrelli; Alberto Giannoni; Luigi Emilio Pastormerlo; Andrea Barison; Gianluca Mirizzi; Michele Emdin; Claudio Passino
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-26

Review 5.  Concepts of hypoxic NO signaling in remote ischemic preconditioning.

Authors:  Matthias Totzeck; Ulrike Hendgen-Cotta; Tienush Rassaf
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-26

Review 6.  Remote ischemic conditioning.

Authors:  Gerd Heusch; Hans Erik Bøtker; Karin Przyklenk; Andrew Redington; Derek Yellon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Ischemic postconditioning does not provide cardioprotection from long-term ischemic injury in isolated male or female rat hearts.

Authors:  Daniel S Lee; Gregory E Steinbaugh; Ricardo Quarrie; Fuchun Yang; M A Hassan Talukder; Jay L Zweier; Juan A Crestanello
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2010-09-26       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 8.  Cardiac and neuroprotection regulated by α(1)-adrenergic receptor subtypes.

Authors:  Dianne M Perez; Van A Doze
Journal:  J Recept Signal Transduct Res       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 2.092

9.  Is nitrite the circulating endocrine effector of remote ischemic preconditioning?

Authors:  Paola Corti; Mark T Gladwin
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 17.367

10.  Impact of O-GlcNAc on cardioprotection by remote ischaemic preconditioning in non-diabetic and diabetic patients.

Authors:  Rebekka V Jensen; Natasha E Zachara; Per H Nielsen; Hans Henrik Kimose; Steen B Kristiansen; Hans Erik Bøtker
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 10.787

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.