PURPOSE: Any catheter material placed in the urinary tract provides a surface for bacterial colonization and, therefore, it is susceptible to encrustation with crystalline bacterial biofilm. Encrustation and blockage by biofilms remain a major complication in patient care. Most patients with indwelling ureteral stents experience irritative symptoms related to these implants and many experience discomfort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Plasma deposited diamond-like amorphous carbon coatings are well-known for their excellent biocompatibility. A low temperature, low pressure plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition technology was developed especially for coating polymeric medical implants with diamond-like carbon. We investigated the ability of diamond-like carbon to decrease the formation of crystalline bacterial biofilm as well as stent related side effects and discomfort. Diamond-like carbon coated ureteral Double-J stents were tested in vivo. RESULTS: In 10 patients with heavy encrustation, different underlying diseases and a stent removal frequency of less than 6 weeks due to encrustation a total of 26 diamond-like carbon coated stents were successfully tested for their ability to decrease the extent of crystalline biofilm formation. There was a 2,467-day period of experience with diamond-like carbon coated stents. No primarily stent related complications occurred. No crystalline biofilm formation was observed in vivo. Excellent and facile handling, a less painful replacement procedure and high tolerance of application were reported by physicians and patients. Due to low friction the coated stents could be placed and removed much more easily than standard stents. The frequency and severity of symptomatic urinary tract infections were distinctly decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Diamond-like carbon coating is a new strategy to improve the surface properties of ureteral stents. This novel surface effectively decreases friction, encrustation tendencies and biofilm formation.
PURPOSE: Any catheter material placed in the urinary tract provides a surface for bacterial colonization and, therefore, it is susceptible to encrustation with crystalline bacterial biofilm. Encrustation and blockage by biofilms remain a major complication in patient care. Most patients with indwelling ureteral stents experience irritative symptoms related to these implants and many experience discomfort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Plasma deposited diamond-like amorphous carbon coatings are well-known for their excellent biocompatibility. A low temperature, low pressure plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition technology was developed especially for coating polymeric medical implants with diamond-like carbon. We investigated the ability of diamond-like carbon to decrease the formation of crystalline bacterial biofilm as well as stent related side effects and discomfort. Diamond-like carbon coated ureteral Double-J stents were tested in vivo. RESULTS: In 10 patients with heavy encrustation, different underlying diseases and a stent removal frequency of less than 6 weeks due to encrustation a total of 26 diamond-like carbon coated stents were successfully tested for their ability to decrease the extent of crystalline biofilm formation. There was a 2,467-day period of experience with diamond-like carbon coated stents. No primarily stent related complications occurred. No crystalline biofilm formation was observed in vivo. Excellent and facile handling, a less painful replacement procedure and high tolerance of application were reported by physicians and patients. Due to low friction the coated stents could be placed and removed much more easily than standard stents. The frequency and severity of symptomatic urinary tract infections were distinctly decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Diamond-like carbon coating is a new strategy to improve the surface properties of ureteral stents. This novel surface effectively decreases friction, encrustation tendencies and biofilm formation.
Authors: N Laube; L Kleinen; U Böde; C Fisang; A Meissner; J Bradenahl; I Syring; H Busch; W Pinkowski; S C Müller Journal: Urologe A Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 0.639
Authors: Jochen Schneider; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Julia Fremd; Philipp Schenk; Andreas Obermeier; Rainer Burgkart; Stefanie Forkl; Susanne Feihl; Nina Wantia; Bruno Neu; Monther Bajbouj; Stefan von Delius; Roland M Schmid; Hana Algül; Andreas Weber Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-10-14 Impact factor: 3.240