Literature DB >> 17437435

Prognostic accuracy of an artificial neural network in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a comparison with logistic regression analysis.

PierFrancesco Bassi1, Emilio Sacco, Vincenzo De Marco, Maurizio Aragona, Andrea Volpe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the prognostic performance of an artificial neural network (ANN) with that of standard logistic regression (LR), in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From February 1982 to February 1994, 369 evaluable patients with non-metastatic bladder cancer had pelvic lymph node dissection and radical cystectomy for either stage Ta-T1 (any grade) tumour not responding to intravesical therapy, with or with no carcinoma in situ, or stage T2-T4 tumour. LR analysis based on 12 variables was used to identify predictors of overall 5-year survival, and the ANN model was developed to predict the same outcome. The LR analysis, based on statistically significant predictors, and the ANN model were the compared for their accuracy in predicting survival.
RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 63 years, and overall 201 of them died. The tumour stage and nodal involvement (both P<0.001) were the only statistically independent predictors of overall 5-year survival on LR analysis. Based on these variables, LR had a sensitivity and specificity for predicting survival of 68.4% and 82.8%, respectively; corresponding values for the ANN were 62.7% and 86.1%. For LR and ANN, the positive predictive values were 78.6% and 76.2%, and the negative predictive values were 73.9% and 76.5%, respectively. The index of diagnostic accuracy was 75.9% for LR and 76.4% for ANN.
CONCLUSIONS: The ANN accurately predicted the survival of patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer and had a prognostic performance comparable with that of LR. As ANNs are based on easy-to-use software that can identify nonlinear interactions between variables, they might become the preferred tool for predicting outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17437435     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06755.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  12 in total

1.  The effect of artificial neural network model combined with six tumor markers in auxiliary diagnosis of lung cancer.

Authors:  Feifei Feng; Yiming Wu; Yongjun Wu; Guangjin Nie; Ran Ni
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Use of nomograms for predictions of outcome in patients with advanced bladder cancer.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Guilherme Godoy; Seth P Lerner
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2009-04

3.  Application of artificial neural network model combined with four biomarkers in auxiliary diagnosis of lung cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoran Duan; Yongli Yang; Shanjuan Tan; Sihua Wang; Xiaolei Feng; Liuxin Cui; Feifei Feng; Songcheng Yu; Wei Wang; Yongjun Wu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  A deep-learning model using automated performance metrics and clinical features to predict urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Hung; Jian Chen; Saum Ghodoussipour; Paul J Oh; Zequn Liu; Jessica Nguyen; Sanjay Purushotham; Inderbir S Gill; Yan Liu
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 5.  A systematic review of the tools available for predicting survival and managing patients with urothelial carcinomas of the bladder and of the upper tract in a curative setting.

Authors:  Sarah J Drouin; David R Yates; Vincent Hupertan; Olivier Cussenot; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Mortality predicted accuracy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with hepatic resection using artificial neural network.

Authors:  Herng-Chia Chiu; Te-Wei Ho; King-Teh Lee; Hong-Yaw Chen; Wen-Hsien Ho
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-04-30

Review 7.  Complementarity of Clinician Judgment and Evidence Based Models in Medical Decision Making: Antecedents, Prospects, and Challenges.

Authors:  Zhou Lulin; Ethel Yiranbon; Henry Asante Antwi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Comparison of three data mining models for prediction of advanced schistosomiasis prognosis in the Hubei province.

Authors:  Guo Li; Xiaorong Zhou; Jianbing Liu; Yuanqi Chen; Hengtao Zhang; Yanyan Chen; Jianhua Liu; Hongbo Jiang; Junjing Yang; Shaofa Nie
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2018-02-15

9.  Prognostication in Patients Treated with Radical Cystectomy for Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma: A New Simplified Model Incorporating Histological Variants.

Authors:  Ja Hyeon Ku; Hyeong Dong Yuk; Guiherme Godoy; Gilard E Amiel; Seth P Lerner
Journal:  Bladder Cancer       Date:  2018-04-26

10.  A systematic review of the applications of Expert Systems (ES) and machine learning (ML) in clinical urology.

Authors:  Hesham Salem; Daniele Soria; Jonathan N Lund; Amir Awwad
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.