Literature DB >> 17437333

Concentration gradient immunoassay. 2. Computational modeling for analysis and optimization.

Jennifer O Foley1, Kjell E Nelson, Afshin Mashadi-Hossein, Bruce A Finlayson, Paul Yager.   

Abstract

A novel microfluidic surface-based competition immunoassay, termed the concentration gradient immunoassay (described in detail in a companion paper (Nelson, K.; Foley, J.; Yager, P. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 3542-3548.) uses surface plasmon resonance (SPR) imaging to rapidly measure the concentration of small molecules. To conduct this assay, antibody and analyte are introduced into the two inlets of a T-sensor (Weigl, B. H.; Yager, P. Science 1999, 283, 346-347. Kamholz, A. E.; Weigl, B. H.; Finlayson, B. A.; Yager, P. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 5340-5347). Several millimeters downstream, antibody molecules with open binding sites can bind to a surface functionalized with immobilized antigen. This space- and time-dependent binding can be sensitively observed using SPR imaging. In this paper, we describe a complex three-dimensional finite element model developed to better understand the dynamic processes occurring with this assay. The model shows strong qualitative agreement with experimental results for small-molecule detection. The model confirms the experimental finding that the position within the microchannel at which the antibody binds to the immobilized analyte may be used to quantify the concentration of analyte in the sample. In addition, the model was used to explore the sensitivity of assay performance to parameters such as antibody and analyte concentrations, thereby giving insight into ways to optimize analysis speed and accuracy. Given the experimental verification of the computational results, this model serves as an efficient method to explore the influence of the flow rate, microchannel dimensions, and antibody concentration on the sensitivity of the assay.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17437333      PMCID: PMC2546490          DOI: 10.1021/ac062350v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  20 in total

1.  Quantitative analysis of molecular interaction in a microfluidic channel: the T-sensor.

Authors:  A E Kamholz; B H Weigl; B A Finlayson; P Yager
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Micromosaic immunoassays.

Authors:  A Bernard; B Michel; E Delamarche
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Electrokinetically driven microfluidic chips with surface-modified chambers for heterogeneous immunoassays.

Authors:  A Dodge; K Fluri; E Verpoorte; N F de Rooij
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 4.  Array biosensor for detection of toxins.

Authors:  Frances S Ligler; Chris Rowe Taitt; Lisa C Shriver-Lake; Kim E Sapsford; Yura Shubin; Joel P Golden
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 5.  Microfluidic diagnostic technologies for global public health.

Authors:  Paul Yager; Thayne Edwards; Elain Fu; Kristen Helton; Kjell Nelson; Milton R Tam; Bernhard H Weigl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Real-time observation of affinity reactions using grating couplers: determination of the detection limit and calculation of kinetic rate constants.

Authors:  R Polzius; E Diessel; F F Bier; U Bilitewski
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1997-06-01       Impact factor: 3.365

7.  Development of surface plasmon resonance-based immunoassay for aflatoxin B(1).

Authors:  S J Daly; G J Keating; P P Dillon; B M Manning; R O'Kennedy; H A Lee; M R Morgan
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.279

8.  High-sensitivity miniaturized immunoassays for tumor necrosis factor alpha using microfluidic systems.

Authors:  Sandro Cesaro-Tadic; Gregor Dernick; David Juncker; Gerrit Buurman; Harald Kropshofer; Bruno Michel; Christof Fattinger; Emmanuel Delamarche
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2004-11-10       Impact factor: 6.799

9.  Continuous flow immunosensor for highly selective and real-time detection of sub-ppb levels of 2-hydroxybiphenyl by using surface plasmon resonance imaging.

Authors:  K Vengatajalabathy Gobi; Hiroyuki Tanaka; Yukihiro Shoyama; Norio Miura
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 10.618

10.  Simultaneous detection of C-reactive protein and other cardiac markers in human plasma using micromosaic immunoassays and self-regulating microfluidic networks.

Authors:  Marc Wolf; David Juncker; Bruno Michel; Patrick Hunziker; Emmanuel Delamarche
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 10.618

View more
  9 in total

1.  A continuous flow microfluidic calorimeter: 3-D numerical modeling with aqueous reactants.

Authors:  Mehmet A Sen; Gregory J Kowalski; Jason Fiering; Dale Larson
Journal:  Thermochim Acta       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.115

2.  The assembly state between magnetic nanosensors and their targets orchestrates their magnetic relaxation response.

Authors:  Charalambos Kaittanis; Santimukul Santra; Oscar J Santiesteban; Terry J Henderson; J Manuel Perez
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Finite-element model of interaction between fungal polysaccharide and monoclonal antibody in the capsule of Cryptococcus neoformans.

Authors:  Vineet Rakesh; Andrew D Schweitzer; Oscar Zaragoza; Ruth Bryan; Kevin Wong; Ashim Datta; Arturo Casadevall; Ekaterina Dadachova
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Highly efficient binding of paramagnetic beads bioconjugated with 100,000 or more antibodies to protein-coated surfaces.

Authors:  Vigneshwaran Mani; Dhanuka P Wasalathanthri; Amit A Joshi; Challa V Kumar; James F Rusling
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Albumin pre-coating enhances intracellular siRNA delivery of multifunctional amphiphile/siRNA nanoparticles.

Authors:  China M Kummitha; Anthony S Malamas; Zheng-Rong Lu
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2012-10-02

Review 6.  Small molecule immunosensing using surface plasmon resonance.

Authors:  John Mitchell
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Instantaneous physico-chemical analysis of suspension-based nanomaterials.

Authors:  Fanxu Meng; Victor M Ugaz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Development of novel anti-Kv 11.1 antibody-conjugated PEG-TiO2 nanoparticles for targeting pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells.

Authors:  Angelica Sette; Jolanda Spadavecchia; Jessem Landoulsi; Sandra Casale; Bernard Haye; Olivia Crociani; Annarosa Arcangeli
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 2.253

9.  Pairwise detection of site-specific receptor phosphorylations using single-molecule blotting.

Authors:  Kyung Lock Kim; Daehyung Kim; Seongsil Lee; Su-Jeong Kim; Jung Eun Noh; Joung-Hun Kim; Young Chan Chae; Jong-Bong Lee; Sung Ho Ryu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 14.919

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.