Literature DB >> 23319453

How do mammalian transposons induce genetic variation? A conceptual framework: the age, structure, allele frequency, and genome context of transposable elements may define their wide-ranging biological impacts.

Keiko Akagi1, Jingfeng Li, David E Symer.   

Abstract

In this essay, we discuss new insights into the wide-ranging impacts of mammalian transposable elements (TE) on gene expression and function. Nearly half of each mammalian genome is comprised of these mobile, repetitive elements. While most TEs are ancient relics, certain classes can move from one chromosomal location to another even now. Indeed, striking recent data show that extensive transposition occurs not only in the germline over evolutionary time, but also in developing somatic tissues and particular human cancers. While occasional germline TE insertions may contribute to genetic variation, many other, similar TEs appear to have little or no impact on neighboring genes. However, the effects of somatic insertions on gene expression and function remain almost completely unknown. We present a conceptual framework to understand how the ages, allele frequencies, molecular structures, and especially the genomic context of mammalian TEs each can influence their various possible functional consequences.
Copyright © 2013 WILEY Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23319453      PMCID: PMC4270750          DOI: 10.1002/bies.201200133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioessays        ISSN: 0265-9247            Impact factor:   4.345


  109 in total

1.  Retrotransposition of marked SVA elements by human L1s in cultured cells.

Authors:  Dustin C Hancks; John L Goodier; Prabhat K Mandal; Ling E Cheung; Haig H Kazazian
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  Genome architecture marked by retrotransposons modulates predisposition to DNA methylation in cancer.

Authors:  Marcos R H Estécio; Juan Gallegos; Céline Vallot; Ryan J Castoro; Woonbok Chung; Shinji Maegawa; Yasuhiro Oki; Yutaka Kondo; Jaroslav Jelinek; Lanlan Shen; Helge Hartung; Peter D Aplan; Bogdan A Czerniak; Shoudan Liang; Jean-Pierre J Issa
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  A novel active endogenous retrovirus family contributes to genome variability in rat inbred strains.

Authors:  Yongming Wang; Frantisek Liska; Claudia Gosele; Lucie Sedová; Vladimír Kren; Drahomíra Krenová; Zoltán Ivics; Norbert Hubner; Zsuzsanna Izsvák
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Genome sequencing of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells reveals retroelement stability and infrequent DNA rearrangement during reprogramming.

Authors:  Aaron R Quinlan; Michael J Boland; Mitchell L Leibowitz; Svetlana Shumilina; Sidney M Pehrson; Kristin K Baldwin; Ira M Hall
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 24.633

5.  L1 retrotransposition is suppressed by endogenously encoded small interfering RNAs in human cultured cells.

Authors:  Nuo Yang; Haig H Kazazian
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2006-08-27       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 6.  Cytosine methylation and the ecology of intragenomic parasites.

Authors:  J A Yoder; C P Walsh; T H Bestor
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 11.639

7.  Characteristics of transposable element exonization within human and mouse.

Authors:  Noa Sela; Britta Mersch; Agnes Hotz-Wagenblatt; Gil Ast
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Thousands of human mobile element fragments undergo strong purifying selection near developmental genes.

Authors:  Craig B Lowe; Gill Bejerano; David Haussler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Genome of the marsupial Monodelphis domestica reveals innovation in non-coding sequences.

Authors:  Tarjei S Mikkelsen; Matthew J Wakefield; Bronwen Aken; Chris T Amemiya; Jean L Chang; Shannon Duke; Manuel Garber; Andrew J Gentles; Leo Goodstadt; Andreas Heger; Jerzy Jurka; Michael Kamal; Evan Mauceli; Stephen M J Searle; Ted Sharpe; Michelle L Baker; Mark A Batzer; Panayiotis V Benos; Katherine Belov; Michele Clamp; April Cook; James Cuff; Radhika Das; Lance Davidow; Janine E Deakin; Melissa J Fazzari; Jacob L Glass; Manfred Grabherr; John M Greally; Wanjun Gu; Timothy A Hore; Gavin A Huttley; Michael Kleber; Randy L Jirtle; Edda Koina; Jeannie T Lee; Shaun Mahony; Marco A Marra; Robert D Miller; Robert D Nicholls; Mayumi Oda; Anthony T Papenfuss; Zuly E Parra; David D Pollock; David A Ray; Jacqueline E Schein; Terence P Speed; Katherine Thompson; John L VandeBerg; Claire M Wade; Jerilyn A Walker; Paul D Waters; Caleb Webber; Jennifer R Weidman; Xiaohui Xie; Michael C Zody; Jennifer A Marshall Graves; Chris P Ponting; Matthew Breen; Paul B Samollow; Eric S Lander; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Impact of Alu repeats on the evolution of human p53 binding sites.

Authors:  Feng Cui; Michael V Sirotin; Victor B Zhurkin
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 4.540

View more
  6 in total

1.  Death by transposition - the enemy within?

Authors:  John M Sedivy; Jill A Kreiling; Nicola Neretti; Marco De Cecco; Steven W Criscione; Jeffrey W Hofmann; Xiaoai Zhao; Takahiro Ito; Abigail L Peterson
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  T-lex2: genotyping, frequency estimation and re-annotation of transposable elements using single or pooled next-generation sequencing data.

Authors:  Anna-Sophie Fiston-Lavier; Maite G Barrón; Dmitri A Petrov; Josefa González
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Exploration of the Drosophila buzzatii transposable element content suggests underestimation of repeats in Drosophila genomes.

Authors:  Nuria Rius; Yolanda Guillén; Alejandra Delprat; Aurélie Kapusta; Cédric Feschotte; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Dynamic silencing of somatic L1 retrotransposon insertions reflects the developmental and cellular contexts of their genomic integration.

Authors:  Manoj Kannan; Jingfeng Li; Sarah E Fritz; Kathryn E Husarek; Jonathan C Sanford; Teresa L Sullivan; Pawan Kumar Tiwary; Wenfeng An; Jef D Boeke; David E Symer
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2017-05-10

5.  An antisense promoter in mouse L1 retrotransposon open reading frame-1 initiates expression of diverse fusion transcripts and limits retrotransposition.

Authors:  Jingfeng Li; Manoj Kannan; Anna L Trivett; Hongling Liao; Xiaolin Wu; Keiko Akagi; David E Symer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Transposable elements become active and mobile in the genomes of aging mammalian somatic tissues.

Authors:  Marco De Cecco; Steven W Criscione; Abigail L Peterson; Nicola Neretti; John M Sedivy; Jill A Kreiling
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.682

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.