Literature DB >> 17434353

A universal global rating scale for the evaluation of technical skills in the operating room.

Jeffrey D Doyle1, Eric M Webber, Ravi S Sidhu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ideal assessment of technical skills should be defensible and practical. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of a Global Rating Scale (GRS) Assessment tool of resident operating room performance.
METHODS: Residents were assessed in the operating room on multiple occasions during a 6-month study period using a 9-item GRS. Data were analyzed to assess scale reliability and sensitivity to year of training. Feasibility was evaluated with a post-study questionnaire.
RESULTS: Seven residents had a total of 32 procedures assessed. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that scores increased with year of training (P = .009). Reliability was excellent. (Cronbach's alpha .91). The post-study survey identified feedback and faculty interaction as strengths of this tool, but time constraint was a barrier.
CONCLUSIONS: The GRS tool is a valid and reliable method that has the potential to be a practical, useful assessment tool of resident operating room performance.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17434353     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  37 in total

1.  Looks can be deceiving: Gaze pattern differences between novices and experts during placement of central lines.

Authors:  Hong-En Chen; Cheyenne C Sonntag; David F Pepley; Rohan S Prabhu; David C Han; Jason Z Moore; Scarlett R Miller
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  [Quality and objectifiability of training and advanced training in urology].

Authors:  S C Müller; T Strunk; P Alken
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Review of methods for objective surgical skill evaluation.

Authors:  Carol E Reiley; Henry C Lin; David D Yuh; Gregory D Hager
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Global Rating Scales and Motion Analysis Are Valid Proficiency Metrics in Virtual and Benchtop Knee Arthroscopy Simulators.

Authors:  Justues Chang; Daniel C Banaszek; Jason Gambrel; Davide Bardana
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  [The GESRU Endo-Training - strategies for the optimization of endourological skills for residents].

Authors:  C P Meyer; J Salem; L A Kluth; N Sanatgar; H Borgmann; P Grange; F-K Chun
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Evaluating Surgical Resident Needle Insertion Skill Gains in Central Venous Catheterization Training.

Authors:  Hong-En Chen; Mary A Yovanoff; David F Pepley; Rohan S Prabhu; Cheyenne C Sonntag; David C Han; Jason Z Moore; Scarlett R Miller
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  Reliable and valid assessment of Lichtenstein hernia repair skills.

Authors:  C G Carlsen; K Lindorff-Larsen; P Funch-Jensen; L Lund; P Charles; L Konge
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 8.  A systematic review of performance assessment tools for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Yusuke Watanabe; Elif Bilgic; Ekaterina Lebedeva; Katherine M McKendy; Liane S Feldman; Gerald M Fried; Melina C Vassiliou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Work domain constraints for modelling surgical performance.

Authors:  Thierry Morineau; Laurent Riffaud; Xavier Morandi; Jonathan Villain; Pierre Jannin
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.924

10.  Surgeon-Authored Virtual Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy Module Is Judged Effective and Preferred Over Traditional Teaching Tools.

Authors:  Sergei Kurenov; Juan Cendan; Saleh Dindar; Kristopher Attwood; James Hassett; Ruth Nawotniak; Gregory Cherr; William G Cance; Jörg Peters
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 2.058

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.