Literature DB >> 17433510

Sociocultural barriers to cervical screening in South Auckland, New Zealand.

Sarah Lovell1, Robin A Kearns, Wardlow Friesen.   

Abstract

Cervical screening has been subject to intense media scrutiny in New Zealand in recent years prompted by a series of health system failings through which a number of women developed cervical cancer despite undergoing regular smears. This paper considers why underscreening persists in a country where cervical screening has a high profile. It explores how the promotion of cervical screening has impacted on the decisions of women to undergo a smear test. Ideas of risk and the new public health are deployed to develop a context for thinking about screening as a form of governing the body. Qualitative interviews with 17 women who were overdue for a cervical smear were undertaken in 2001-2002, yielding understandings of their knowledge of screening and their reasons for postponement. Nine providers of screening services were also interviewed. Concurrent with socioeconomic limitations, concerns over exposing one's body loomed large in women's reasons for delaying being screened. In particular, feelings of shyness and embarrassment were encountered among Maori and Pacific women for whom exposing bodies in the process of smear taking compromises cultural beliefs about sacredness. We conclude that medicalization of the body has, paradoxically, assisted many women in dealing with the intrusion of screening. For others, compliance with the exhortations to be screened brings a high emotional and cultural cost which should at least be considered in health policy debates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17433510     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.02.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  9 in total

1.  Avoiding piecemeal research on participation in cervical cancer screening: the advantages of a social identity framework.

Authors:  Candice Tribe; Janine Webb
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Motivations and experiences of women who accessed "see and treat" cervical cancer prevention services in Zambia.

Authors:  Heather L White; Chishimba Mulambia; Moses Sinkala; Mulindi H Mwanahamuntu; Groesbeck P Parham; Sharon Kapambwe; Linda Moneyham; Mirjam C Kempf; Eric Chamot
Journal:  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.949

Review 3.  Qualitative factors influencing breast and cervical cancer screening in women: A scoping review.

Authors:  Jerrald Lau; Pami Shrestha; Janelle Shaina Ng; Gretel Jianlin Wong; Helena Legido-Quigley; Ker-Kan Tan
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-05-13

4.  Cervical screening among migrant women: a qualitative study of Polish, Slovak and Romanian women in London, UK.

Authors:  Marta Jackowska; Christian von Wagner; Jane Wardle; Dorota Juszczyk; Aleksandra Luszczynska; Jo Waller
Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care       Date:  2012-01-04

5.  Cervical cancer knowledge and screening behaviors among female university graduates of year 2012 attending national graduate orientation program, Bhutan.

Authors:  Tshering Dhendup; Pandup Tshering
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 6.  The sociology of cancer: a decade of research.

Authors:  Anne Kerr; Emily Ross; Gwen Jacques; Sarah Cunningham-Burley
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2018-02-15

7.  Mind the gaps: a qualitative study of perceptions of healthcare professionals on challenges and proposed remedies for cervical cancer help-seeking in post conflict northern Uganda.

Authors:  Amos D Mwaka; Henry R Wabinga; Harriet Mayanja-Kizza
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Self-administered versus provider-directed sampling in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study (ACCSS): a qualitative investigation with Canadian First Nations women.

Authors:  Ingeborg Zehbe; Pamela Wakewich; Amy-Dee King; Kyla Morrisseau; Candace Tuck
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Reported Māori consumer experiences of health systems and programs in qualitative research: a systematic review with meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Suetonia C Palmer; Harriet Gray; Tania Huria; Cameron Lacey; Lutz Beckert; Suzanne G Pitama
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2019-10-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.