Literature DB >> 17433334

The effect of muscle loading on the kinematics of in vitro glenohumeral abduction.

Angela E Kedgley1, Geoffrey A Mackenzie, Louis M Ferreira, Darren S Drosdowech, Graham J W King, Kenneth J Faber, James A Johnson.   

Abstract

This in vitro study evaluated the effects of four different muscle-loading ratios on active glenohumeral joint abduction. Eight cadaveric shoulders were tested using a shoulder simulator designed to reproduce unconstrained abduction of the humerus via computer-controlled pneumatic actuation. Forces were applied to cables that were sutured to tendons or fixed to bone, to simulate loading of the supraspinatus, subscapularis, infraspinatus/teres minor, and anterior, middle, and posterior deltoid muscles. Four sets of muscle-loading ratios were employed, based on: (1) equal loads, (2) average physiological cross-sectional areas (pCSAs), (3) constant values of the product of electromyographic (EMG) data and pCSAs, and (4) variable ratios of the EMG and pCSA data which changed as a function of abduction angle. The investigator generated passive motions with no muscle loads simulated. Repeatability was quantified by five successive trials of the passive and simulated active motions. There was improved repeatability in the simulated active motions versus passive motions, significant for abduction angles less than 40 degrees (p=0.02). No difference was found in the repeatability of the four different muscle-loading ratios for simulated active motions (p0.067 for all angles). The improved repeatability of active over passive motion suggests simulated active motion should be employed for in vitro simulations of shoulder motion.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17433334     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  10 in total

1.  Implant Design Variations in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Influence the Required Deltoid Force and Resultant Joint Load.

Authors:  Joshua W Giles; G Daniel G Langohr; James A Johnson; George S Athwal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Moment arms of the muscles crossing the anatomical shoulder.

Authors:  David C Ackland; Ponnaren Pak; Martin Richardson; Marcus G Pandy
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Towards the development of a novel experimental shoulder simulator with rotating scapula and individually controlled muscle forces simulating the rotator cuff.

Authors:  Daniel Baumgartner; Daniel Tomas; Lukas Gossweiler; Walter Siegl; Georg Osterhoff; Bernd Heinlein
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Remplissage versus latarjet for engaging Hill-Sachs defects without substantial glenoid bone loss: a biomechanical comparison.

Authors:  Ryan M Degen; Joshua W Giles; James A Johnson; George S Athwal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  In Vitro Simulation of Shoulder Motion Driven by Three-Dimensional Scapular and Humeral Kinematics.

Authors:  Hema J Sulkar; Tyler W Knighton; Linda Amoafo; Klevis Aliaj; Christopher W Kolz; Yue Zhang; Tucker Hermans; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Additive fiber-cerclages in proximal humeral fractures stabilized by locking plates: no effect on fracture stabilization and rotator cuff function in human shoulder specimens.

Authors:  Christine Voigt; Christof Hurschler; Louise Rechi; Rolf Vosshenrich; Helmut Lill
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  The effects of wrist motion and hand orientation on muscle forces: A physiologic wrist simulator study.

Authors:  Darshan S Shah; Claire Middleton; Sabahat Gurdezi; Maxim D Horwitz; Angela E Kedgley
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 8.  Biomechanical analysis of plate systems for proximal humerus fractures: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Ali Jabran; Chris Peach; Lei Ren
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  An in-vitro study of rotator cuff tear and repair kinematics using single- and double-row suture anchor fixation.

Authors:  Angela E Kedgley; Benjamin J Shore; George S Athwal; James A Johnson; Kenneth J Faber
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2013-04

10.  Control of a wrist joint motion simulator: A phantom study.

Authors:  Darshan S Shah; Angela E Kedgley
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 2.712

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.