Literature DB >> 17432987

Outcomes in 2748 patients referred to a colorectal two-week rule clinic.

R A Smith1, O Oshin, J McCallum, J Randles, S Kennedy, S Delamere, P S Rooney, P S Carter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the 3-year outcomes of a nurse-led, one-stop, 2-week rule (TWR) clinic for suspected colorectal cancer (CRC) in a large teaching hospital.
METHOD: Data were collected prospectively from January 2002 to December 2004. In total, 2748 patients were seen over the 3-year period. The ratio of male:female subjects was 1190:1558 (43%:57%). Median age at presentation was 66 years (range 17-96).
RESULTS: A total of 1363 (49.6%) nonconforming referrals were made; 1300 patients (47.3%) underwent flexible sigmoidoscopy during their initial assessment in clinic; 1439 patients (52.4%) underwent a barium enema during the course of their investigation; 2503 patients (91.1%) were seen within 14 working days. The median overall wait for the initial clinic appointment was 10 days. The annual number of patients seen was similar over the 3-year period. A total of 174 cancers (6.3%) were identified which accounted for 36.4% of all CRCs diagnosed during the study period. Nineteen cancers presented in the nonconforming group (1.6% of all non-conforming patients). Rectal tumours accounted for 59.8% (n = 104) of all cancers diagnosed while right-sided tumours accounted for only 10.9% (n = 19). Advanced tumours accounted for 73.0% (n = 127) of the total; 133 (76.4%) cancer patients underwent some form of surgical intervention.
CONCLUSION: A specialist nurse-led, one-stop TWR clinic for suspected colorectal cancer is sustainable and can be run successfully with over 90% of referrals seen within the targeted time period. The proportion of non-conforming referrals was high and a large number of advanced and unstaged tumours was observed. Low numbers of proximal tumours were detected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17432987     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01048.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  8 in total

1.  The effectiveness of a rapid-access flexible sigmoidoscopy clinic in a district hospital.

Authors:  Paolo G Sorelli; Alex D Iliadis; John G Payne
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug

2.  The Two-Week Referral System for colorectal cancer--not fit for purpose.

Authors:  Robert T Padwick; Adeel A Bajwa; Annabel Shaw; Edmund Leung; James Francombe; Michael L Stellakis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-06-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Trends in urgent referrals for suspected colorectal cancer: an increase in quantity, but not in quality.

Authors:  P Vulliamy; S McCluney; S Raouf; S Banerjee
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  How important is it to investigate the whole of the colon after initial assessment at a rapid access colorectal clinic?

Authors:  Chung Sim Lim; Linnet McGeever; Judith Helen Grey; Arunachalam Krishna; Aijaz Ahmed Jabbar; Wilson Stephen Hendry
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Prevalence of pelvic floor symptoms in female patients attending the two-week wait clinic with suspected colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J Bennett; A Greenwood; P Durdey; D Glancy
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Is the "red flag" referral pathway effective in diagnosing colorectal carcinoma?

Authors:  Alison McCoubrey; Conor Warren; Ian McAllister; Robert Gilliland
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2012-09

7.  Patients' experiences of referral for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Shane W Pascoe; Craig Veitch; Lisa J Crossland; Justin J Beilby; Allan Spigelman; John Stubbs; Mark F Harris
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  The one-stop trial: does electronic referral and booking by the general practitioner (GPs) to outpatient day case surgery reduce waiting time and costs? A randomized controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  Knut Magne Augestad; Arthur Revhaug; Barthold Vonen; Roar Johnsen; Rolv-Ole Lindsetmo
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.